Skip to main content

Implications of Policy Uncertainty for Innovation in Environmental Technologies: The Case of Public R&D Budgets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Dynamics of Environmental and Economic Systems

Abstract

The role that environmental policy uncertainty can play on innovation in environmental technologies has not been extensively assessed empirically. In this chapter, we seek to assess the impact of environmental policy uncertainty on innovation, using patent data as a proxy for innovation and volatility in public expenditures on ‘environmental’ R&D as a measure of policy uncertainty. Drawing upon a panel data set of 23 OECD countries over the period 1986–2007, support is found for the negative effect of public R&D volatility on innovation. In the base model, a 10% increase in policy uncertainty is seen to cause a 1.2–2.8% decrease in environmental patent activity, whereas a 10% increase in government support for R&D will increase innovation by 2.6–3.9%.

The views expressed here are the authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those of the OECD or its members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Studies exploring this effect include Rodrik (1991) and Aizenman and Marion (1993), among others.

  2. 2.

    Note that the resale value may be zero if the capital is specific, and the regulatory change impacts on all potential adopters.

  3. 3.

    http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=29068

  4. 4.

    ‘Fractional’ counts are generated in cases when inventors from multiple countries are listed.

  5. 5.

    ‘Priority date’ indicates the earliest application date worldwide (within a given patent family).

  6. 6.

    In the sample used for econometric analysis, storage patents represent on average only 0.2% of total patents. Nevertheless, in order to avoid any concern over possible endogeneity, regressions are estimated considering the difference between the patent total and the dependent variable.

  7. 7.

    This covers research into the control of pollution, aimed at the identification and analysis of the sources of pollution and their causes and all pollutants, including their dispersal in the environment and the effects on man, species (fauna, flora, microorganisms) and the biosphere. Development of monitoring facilities for the measurement of all kinds of pollution is included. The same is valid for the elimination of all forms of pollution in all types of environment.

References

  • Aizenman, J., & Marion, N. P. (1993). Policy uncertainty, persistence and growth. Review of International Economics, 1(2), 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E., & Adu-Bonnah, K. (2008). Investment in risky R&D programs in the face of climate uncertainty. Energy Economics, 30, 465–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, E., & Shittu, E. (2006). Profit-maximizing R&D in response to a random carbon tax. Resource and Energy Economics, 28, 160–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barradale, M. J. (2008). Impact of policy uncertainty on renewable energy investment: Wind power and PTC (Working Paper 08-003). US Association for Energy Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Patents, real options and firm performance. The Economic Journal, 112, C97–C116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, M. C., Herzog, H. J., Parsons, J. E., & Sekar, R. C. (2007). Capture-ready coal plants: Options, technologies and economics. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 1, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, S. B., & Cohen, M. A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 278–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burtraw, D., & Palmer, K. (2004). SO2 Cap-and-trade program in the United States. In W. Harrington, R. Morgenstern, & T. Sterner (Eds.), Choosing environmental policy: Comparing instruments and outcomes in the United States and Europe. Washington, DC: RFF Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarnitzki, D., & Toole, A. A. (2011). Patent protection, market uncertainty, and R&D investment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dernis, H., Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2001). Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output. STI mimeo, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/26/11/21682515.pdf

  • Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzin, Y. H., & Kort, P. M. (2000). Pollution abatement investment when environmental regulation is uncertain. Journal of Public Economic Theory., 2(2), 183–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, S., Szolgayova, J., Obersteiner, M., & Gusti, M. (2008). Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty. Applied Energy, 85, 708–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, R. K., & Ram, R. (2001). Irreversibility of R&D investment and the adverse effect of uncertainty: Evidence from the OECD countries. Economics Letters, 71(2), 287–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J., Hall, B. H., & Griliches, Z. (1984). Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica, 52, 909–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1932). The theory of wages. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isik, M. (2004). Incentives for technology adoption under environmental policy uncertainty: Implications for green payment programs. Environmental and Resource Economics, 27, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, N., Hascic, I., & Kalamova, M. (2010). Environmental policy characteristics and technological innovation. Economia Politica, 2, 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, N., Haščič, I., Poirier, J., Hemar, M., & Michel, C. (2012). Environmental Policy Stringency and Technological Innovation: Evidence from Survey Data and Patent Counts. Applied Economics, 44, 2157–2170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J. O., & Mody, A. (1996). Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy, 25(5), 49–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löfgren, Å., Millock, K., & Nauges, C. (2008). The effect of uncertainty on pollution abatement investments: Measuring hurdle rates for Swedish industry. Resource and Energy Economics, 30, 475–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard, L. J., & Shortle, J. S. (2001). Determinants of cleaner technology investments in the U.S. bleached kraft pulp industry. Land Economics, 77(4), 561–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2002). Frascati manual 2002: Proposed standard practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). OECD patent statistics manual. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1991a). Irreversibility and the explanation of investment behavior. In D. Lund & B. Oksendal (Eds.), Stochastic models and option values. New York/Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers/North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (1991b). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 29, 1110–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (2007). Uncertainty in environmental economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1, 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, A., Boggess, W. G., Moss, C. B., & Holt, J. (1995). Technology adoption decisions under irreversibility and uncertainty: An ‘ex ante’ approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(3), 541–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinelt, P., & Keith, D. (2007). Carbon capture retrofits and the cost of regulatory uncertainty. Energy Journal, 28(4), 101–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1991). Policy uncertainty and private investment in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 36, 229–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Söderholm, P., Ek, K., & Pettersson, M. (2007). Wind power development in Sweden: Global policies and local obstacles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 365–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiser, R. H., & Pickle, S. J. (1998). Financing investments in renewable energy: The impacts of policy design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2, 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xepapadeas, A. (2001). Environmental policy and firm behavior: Abatement investment and location decisions under uncertainty and irreversibility. In C. Carraro & G. E. Metcalfe (Eds.), Behavioral and distributional effects of environmental policy (pp. 281–308). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Blyth, W., Bradley, R., Bunn, D., Clarke, C., & Wilson, T. (2008). Evaluating the power investment options with uncertainty in climate policy. Energy Economics, 30, 1933–1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Johnstone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

IPC classes for environmental technologies

A.1. Air pollution abatement

Filters or filtering processes specially modified for separating dispersed particles from gases or vapours

B01D46

Separating dispersed particles from gases, air or vapours by liquid as separating agent

B01D47

Separating dispersed particles from gases, air or vapours by other methods

B01D49

Combinations of devices for separating particles from gases or vapours

B01D50

Auxiliary pretreatment of gases or vapours to be cleaned from dispersed particles

B01D51

Chemical or biological purification of waste gases

B01D53/34-72

Separating dispersed particles from gases or vapour, e.g. air, by electrostatic effect

B03C3

Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes for reducing smoke development

C10L10/02

Use of additives to fuels or fires for particular purposes for facilitating soot removal

C10L10/06

Blast furnaces; dust arresters

C21B7/22

Manufacture of carbon steel, e.g. plain mild steel, medium carbon steel or cast steel; removal of waste gases or dust

C21C5/38

Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying or rendering innocuous

F01N3

Exhaust or silencing apparatus combined or associated with devices profiting by exhaust energy

F01N5

Exhaust or silencing apparatus, or parts thereof

F01N7

Electrical control of exhaust gas treating apparatus

F01N9

Combustion apparatus characterised by means for returning flue gases to the combustion chamber or to the combustion zone

F23B80

Combustion apparatus characterised by arrangements for returning combustion products or flue gases to the combustion chamber

F23C9

Incinerators or other apparatus specially adapted for consuming waste gases or noxious gases

F23G7/06

Arrangements of devices for treating smoke or fumes of purifiers, e.g. for removing noxious material

F23J15

Shaft or like vertical or substantially vertical furnaces; arrangements of dust collectors

F27B1/18

A.2. Water pollution abatement

Arrangements of installations for treating wastewater or sewage

B63J4

Treatment of water, wastewater, sewage or sludge

C02F

Fertilisers from wastewater, sewage sludge, sea slime, ooze or similar masses

C05F7

Chemistry; materials for treating liquid pollutants, e.g. oil, gasoline, fat

C09K3/32

Devices for cleaning or keeping clear the surface of open water from oil or like floating materials by separating or removing these materials; barriers therefore

E02B15/04-06

Cleaning or keeping clear the surface of open water; devices for removing the material from the surface

E02B15/10

Methods or installations for obtaining or collecting drinking water or tap water; rain, surface or groundwater

E03B3

Plumbing installations for wastewater

E03C1/12

Sewers – cesspools

E03F

A.3. Waste management

A.3.1. Solid waste collection

Street cleaning; removing undesirable matter, e.g. rubbish, from the land, not otherwise provided for

E01H15

Transporting; gathering or removal of domestic or like refuse

B65F

A.3.2. Material recovery, recycling and reuse

Animal feeding – stuffs from distillers’ or brewers’ waste; waste products of dairy plant; meat, fish or bones; kitchen waste

A23K1/06-10

Footwear made of rubber waste

A43B1/12

Heels or top pieces made of rubber waste

A43B21/14

Separating solid materials; general arrangement of separating plant specially adapted for refuse

B03B9/06

Manufacture of articles from scrap or waste metal particles

B22F8

Preparing material; recycling the material

B29B7/66

Recovery of plastics or other constituents of waste material containing plastics

B29B17

Presses specially adapted for consolidating scrap metal or for compacting used cars

B30B9/32

Systematic disassembly of vehicles for recovery of salvageable components, e.g. for recycling

B62D67

Stripping waste material from cores or formers, e.g. to permit their reuse

B65H73

Applications of disintegrable, dissolvable or edible materials

B65D65/46

Compacting the glass batches, e.g. pelletising

C03B1/02

Glass batch composition – containing silicates, e.g. cullet

C03C6/02

Glass batch composition – containing pellets or agglomerates

C03C6/08

Hydraulic cements from oil shales, residues or waste other than slag

C04B7/24-30

Calcium sulphate cements starting from phosphogypsum or from waste, e.g. purification products of smoke

C04B11/26

Use of agglomerated or waste materials or refuse as fillers for mortars, concrete or artificial stone; waste materials or refuse

C04B18/04-10

Claywares; waste materials or refuse

C04B33/132

Recovery or working up of waste materials (plastics)

C08J11

Luminescent, e.g. electroluminescent, chemiluminescent, materials; recovery of luminescent materials

C09K11/01

Working up used lubricants to recover useful products

C10M175

Working up raw materials other than ores, e.g. scrap, to produce nonferrous metals or compounds thereof

C22B7

Obtaining zinc or zinc oxide; from muffle furnace residues; from metallic residues or scraps

C22B19/28-30

Obtaining tin from scrap, especially tin scrap

C22B25/06

Textiles; disintegrating fibre-containing articles to obtain fibres for reuse

D01G11

Papermaking; fibrous raw materials or their mechanical treatment using waste paper

D21B1/08-10

Papermaking; fibrous raw materials or their mechanical treatment; defibrating by other means of waste paper

D21B1/32

Papermaking; other processes for obtaining cellulose; working up waste paper

D21C5/02

Papermaking; pulping; non-fibrous material added to the pulp; waste products

D21H17/01

Apparatus or processes for salvaging material from electric cables

H01B 15/00

Recovery of material from discharge tubes or lamps

H01J 9/52

Reclaiming serviceable parts of waste cells or batteries

H01M 6/52

Reclaiming serviceable parts of waste accumulators

H01M 10/54

A.3.3. Fertilisers from waste

Fertilisers made from animal corpses or parts thereof

C05F1

Fertilisers from distillery wastes, molasses, vinasses, sugar plant, or similar wastes or residues

C05F5

Fertilisers from waste water, sewage sludge, sea slime, ooze or similar masses

C05F7

Fertilisers from household or town refuse

C05F9

Preparation of fertilisers characterised by the composting step

C05F17

A.3.4. Incineration and energy recovery

Solid fuels essentially based on materials of non-mineral origin; on sewage, house or town refuse; on industrial residues or waste materials

C10L5/46-48

Cremation furnaces; incineration of waste; incinerator constructions; details, accessories or control therefore

F23G5

Cremation furnaces; incinerators or other apparatus specially adapted for consuming specific waste or low-grade fuels

F23G7

A.3.6. Waste management – not elsewhere classified

Disposal of solid waste

B09B

Production of liquid hydrocarbon mixtures from rubber or rubber waste

C10G1/10

Medical or veterinary science; disinfection or sterilising methods specially adapted for refuse

A61L11

A.4. Soil remediation

Reclamation of contaminated soil

B09C

A.5. Environmental monitoring

Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust gas treatment apparatus

F01N11

Alarms responsive to a single specified undesired or abnormal condition and not otherwise provided for, e.g. pollution alarms; toxics

G08B21/12-14

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kalamova, M., Johnstone, N., Haščič, I. (2012). Implications of Policy Uncertainty for Innovation in Environmental Technologies: The Case of Public R&D Budgets. In: Costantini, V., Mazzanti, M. (eds) The Dynamics of Environmental and Economic Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5089-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics