Abstract
Although various types of electronic mobility aids for visually impaired persons have been developed as alternatives to the conventional white cane, users still have much doubt on the effectiveness and usability of these newly introduced aids. To identify ways to improve usability and effectiveness of electronic cane, a task performance study was conducted to examine the usability level of electronic canes using performance metrics (based on time-consumption and error rates). 20 visually impaired persons with and without prior experience using a white cane participated in a 2x2 factorial mixed-design experiment, in which they used two types of cane (white vs. electronic). Results showed that an electronic cane was more effective in avoiding obstacles than a white cane for both experienced and inexperienced users, and previous experience with a white cane was found to be beneficial for timely task completion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
World Health Organization, Visual Impairment and Blindness, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/
Roentgen, U.R., Gelderblom, G.J., Soede, M., de Witte, L.: Inventory of Electronic Mobility Aids for Persons with Visual Impairments: A Literature Review. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 102(11), 702–724 (2008)
Ulrich, I., Borenstein, J.: The GuideCane: Applying Mobile Robot Technologies to Assist the Visually Impaired. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 31(2), 131–136 (2001)
Manduchi, R., Kurniawan, S.: Watch your head, mind your step: Mobility-related accidents experienced by people with visual impairement. UCSC-SOE-10-24. University of California, Santa Cruz (2010)
Brabyn, J.A.: New Developments in Mobility and Orientation Aids for the Blind. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 29(4), 285–289 (1982)
Dowling, J.: Mobility Enhancement using Simulated Artificial Human Vision. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology (2007)
Kanagaratnam, K.: Smart Mobility Cane: Design of Obstacle Detection. EE 4BI6 Electrical Engineering Biomedical Capstones, Paper 8 (2009)
Jacquet, C., Bellik, Y., Bourda, Y.: Electronic Locomotion Aids for the Blind: Towards More Assistive Systems. SCI, vol. 19, pp. 133–163 (2006)
Damaschini, R., Legras, R., Leroux, R., Farcy, R.: Electronic Travel Aid for Blind People. Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe (2005)
Searleman, A., Douglas, H.: Memory from Broader Perspective. McGraw-Hill, New York (1994)
Kara, K.S., Perry, T.J., Krolczyk, M.J.: Testing for Power Usability. In: CHI EA 1997, p. 235 (1997)
Luhmann, N.: Trust and Power. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1979)
Blacklera, A., Popovica, V., Maharb, D.: Investigating Users’ Intuitive Interaction with Complex Artifacts. Applied Ergonomics 41(1), 72–92 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kim, S.Y., Kim, K.J., Sundar, S.S., Biocca, F. (2012). Electronic Cane for Visually Impaired Persons: Empirical Examination of Its Usability and Effectiveness. In: Park, J., Jin, Q., Sang-soo Yeo, M., Hu, B. (eds) Human Centric Technology and Service in Smart Space. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 182. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5086-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5086-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5085-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5086-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)