Abstract
In this paper, I argue that evolutionary thinking started as a secular response to the Christianity of the eighteenth century. While I agree that Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution was in essence scientific, I argue that Darwin’s supporters often wanted to continue to treat evolutionary thinking as a secular response to religious claims. This continues to the present, and I suggest that evolutionists should be aware of this fact and temper their thinking and behavior accordingly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bannister, R.C. 1979. Social Darwinism: Science and myth in Anglo-American social thought. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Bates, H.W. 1862. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidæ. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 23: 495–566.
Chambers, R. 1844. Vestiges of the natural history of creation. London: J. Churchill.
Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species. London: John Murray.
Darwin, C. 1862. On the various contrivances by which British and foreign orchids are fertilised by insects, and on the good effects of intercrossing. London: John Murray.
Darwin, E. 1803. The temple of nature; or the origin of society: A poem, with philosophical notes. London: J. Johnson, St. Paul’s Church-Yard.
Dennett, D.C. 1995. Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Huxley, J.S. 1927. Religion without revelation. London: Ernest Benn.
Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ruse, M. (ed.). 1988. But is it science? The philosophical question in the creation/evolution controversy. Buffalo: Prometheus.
Ruse, M. 1996. Monad to man: The concept of progress in evolutionary biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ruse, M. 1999a. The Darwinian revolution: Science red in tooth and claw, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ruse, M. 1999b. Mystery of mysteries: Is evolution a social construction? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ruse, M. 2000. The evolution wars: A guide to the controversies. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Ruse, M. 2001. Can a Darwinian be a Christian? The relationship between science and religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruse, M. 2003. Darwin and design: Science, philosophy, religion. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spencer, H. 1851. Social statics: Or, the conditions essential to human happiness specified, and the first of them developed. London: John Chapman (published in Dec 1950).
Spencer, H. 1857. Progress: Its law and cause. Westminster Review 67(new series 11(2)): 445–485.
Tennyson, A. 1850. In memoriam. London: Edward Moxon.
Whewell, W. 1840. The philosophy of the inductive sciences, founded upon their history, 2 vols. London: John W. Parker.
Wilson, E.O. 1978. On human nature. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, E.O. 1992. The diversity of life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruse, M. (2012). Evolution Versus Creation: A Sibling Rivalry?. In: Bergandi, D. (eds) The Structural Links between Ecology, Evolution and Ethics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 296. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5067-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5067-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5066-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5067-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)