Skip to main content

Two Philosophies of the Environmental Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 296))

Abstract

One of the most important – and most disturbing – characteristics of philosophical reflection on environmental questions is that there are, in reality, two separate issues involved. One refers to a philosophy of nature and the other to a philosophy of technology. This has led to two forms of well-established and clearly argued reflection, each with its own debates. These two currents have developed independently of each other, and continue to do so, as if the other did not exist. But this duality is no longer tenable. Due to the generalization of the environmental crisis and the emergence of new technologies, it has become impossible to treat nature and technology separately. This paper is thus an attempt at a synthesis of these two fields of environmental ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ellul, J. 1954/1964. The technological society. Trans. J. Wilkinson, with an introduction by R.K. Merton. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 1st French ed., published by A. Colin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, L. 1992/1995. The new ecological order. Chicago: Chicago University Press. 1st French ed., published by Grasset, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrie, J.B. 2003. Environmental ethics: Should we preserve the red herring and flounder? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 16(1): 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1991/1993. We have never been modern. Trans. C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1st French ed., published by La Découverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1999/2004. Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Trans. C. Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1st French ed., published by La Découverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. 1990/1995. The natural contract. Trans. E. MacArthur and W. Paulson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 1st French ed., published by François Bourin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. Jr. 1967. The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science 155(3767): 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Larrère .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Larrère, C. (2012). Two Philosophies of the Environmental Crisis. In: Bergandi, D. (eds) The Structural Links between Ecology, Evolution and Ethics. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 296. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5067-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics