Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Training Design for Instance-Based Learning – The “Staged Process Control Readiness Training” (SPCRT)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Acquisition of Knowledge and Skills for Taskwork and Teamwork to Control Complex Technical Systems

  • 744 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the basic learning processes introduced in Chap. 4 are translated into training designs for novices and experts under the label of the “Staged Process Control Readiness Training”, which has two stages. Additionally, important issues for training design preparation are pointed out, which are the understanding of the production context, e.g. by document analysis, and the relevance of conducting a cognitive task analysis, e.g. by using the critical decision methods.

Training stage 1 addresses the training objectives of novices and explains the relevant training components, which are a full-scope simulator, the design of instances, experiential learning, component practice, briefing and de-briefing techniques, and outlines the responsibilities of the trainer in this stage 1. Stage 2 addresses the training objectives of expert control room operators and formulates training principles in order to make the most of practice. Deliberate practice is proposed to be provided by means of decision skill training, critical thinking training, stress exposure training and team training methods, which are adapted to the expert control room operator’s training needs. Finally, the responsibility of the trainer in stage 2 is emphasised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakken, B. E. (2008). On improving dynamic decision-making: Implications from multiple process cognitive theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 25, 493–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T. T., & Magjuka, R. J. (1997). Training as an organizational episode: Pretraining influence on trainee motivation. In J. K. Ford, S. W. J. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger, E. Salas, & M. S. Teachout (Eds.), Improving training effectiveness in work organizations (pp. 193–221). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T. T., Ford, J. K., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Transfer of training 1988–2008. An updated review and agenda for future research. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24, 41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. Healy, S. Kosslynm, & R. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (pp. 35–67). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2006). Optimizing treatment and instruction: Implications of the new theory of disuse. In L. G. Nilsson & N. Ohta (Eds.), Memory and society. Psychological perspectives (pp. 109–134). Hove: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blickensderfer, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1997). Theoretical bases for team self correction: Fostering shared mental models. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Jackson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (pp. 249–79). Greenwich: JAI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolstad, C. A., Cuevas, H. M., Costello, A. M., & Babbitt, B. (2008). Predicting cognitive readiness of deploying military medical teams. In Proceedings of the human factors and Ergonomics Society, 52nd annual meeting (pp. 970–974). Santa Monica: HFES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, R., & Caple, J. (1990). The theory and practice of training (Rev. 5th ed., 2007). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Bowers, C. (2010). Synthetic learning environments: On developing a science of simulation, games and virtual worlds for training. In S. W. J. Kozlowski & E. Salas (Eds.), Learning, training and development in organizations (pp. 229–262). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. A., Khoo, B. H., & Elliott, R. G. (1990). Component practice and exposure to a problem solving context. Human Factors, 32, 267–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, S. L. (1994). Using voluntary incident reports for human factors evaluations. In N. Johnston, N. McDonald, & R. Fuller (Eds.), Aviation psychology in practice (pp. 149–169). Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. S., & Thompson, B. B. (2001). Training teams to take initiative: Critical thinking in novel situations. Advances in Human Performance and Cognitive Engineering, 1, 251–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. S., Freeman, J. T., & Wolf, S. (1996). Meta-recognition in time-stressed decision making: Recognizing, critiquing, and correcting. Human Factors, 38, 206–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. S., Freeman, J. T., & Thompson, B. (1998/3rd print). critical thinking skills in tactical decision making: A model and a training strategy. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress. Implications for individual and team training (pp. 155–190). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, N. J., & Fiore, S. M. (2010). Cognitive science-based principles for the design and delivery of training. In S. W. J. Kozlowski & E. Sales (Eds.), Learning, training, and development in organizations (pp. 169–201). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, B., Klein, G., & Hoffman, R. R. (2006). Working minds. A practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, D. R., & Meredith, J. R. (2000). An analysis of process industry production and inventory management systems. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 683–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosher, B. A. (2003). Working memory. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (pp. 569–577). London: Nature Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J. E., & Johnston, J. H. (1998/2006 reprint). Stress exposure training. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress. Implications for Individual and team training (pp. 191–217). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, K. D., & Shepherd, A. (1975). A simulator and training technique for diagnosing plant failures from control panels. Ergonomics, 18, 627–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, D. W., & Tenenbaum, G. (2004). Why an expert team is more than a team of experts: A social-cognitive conceptualization of team coordination and communication in sport. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 26, 542–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, L. T., Dalrymple, M. A., Schiflett, S. G., & Miller, J. (2004). Scaling scenarios: Development and application to C4ISR sustained operations research. In S. G. Schiflett, L. R. Elliot, E. Sales, & M. D. Coovert (Eds.), Scaled worlds: Development, validations and applications (pp. 75–99). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S. (2012). Learning from errors: The role of after event reviews. In J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Eds.), Human fallibility. The ambiguity of errors for work and learning (pp. 215–232). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 857–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Entin, E. E., & Serfaty, D. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, 41, 312–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 683–703). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farr, M. J. (1987). The long-term retention of knowledge and skills. A cognitive and instructional perspective. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R., O’Connor, P., & Crichton, M. (2008). Safety at the sharp end. A guide to non-technical skills. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, S. M., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). Group dynamics and shared mental model development. In M. London (Ed.), How people evaluate others in organizations: Person perception and interpersonal judgement in I/O Psychology (pp. 309–336). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransoo, J. C., & Rutten, W. G. M. M. (1994). A typology of production control situations in process industries. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 18, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D., & Jonas, E. (2002). Die Theorie der kognizierten Kontrolle. In D. Frey & M. Irle (Hrsg.), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie. Band III, Motivations-, Selbst- und Informationsverarbeitungstheorien (pp. 13–50). Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, I. L. (1993). Training in organisations. Needs assessment, development and evaluation. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organisations. Needs assessment, development, and evaluation (4th ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, C., Lerch, J. F., & Lebiere, C. (2003). Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making. Cognitive Science, 27, 591–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopher, D. (2007). Emphasis change as a training protocol for high-demand tasks. In A. Kramer, D. Wiegmann, & A. Kirlik (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greitzer, F. L., Podmore, R., Robinson, M., & Ey, P. (2009). Naturalistic decision making for power system operators. Proceedings of the NDM9, the 9th international conference on naturalistic decision making, London, UK. Also available online: http://www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_ndm09_s1paper2.pdf

  • Hagemann, V. (2011). Trainingsentwicklung für high responsibility teams. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, V., Kluge, A., & Ritzmann, S. (2011). High responsibility teams – Eine systematische analyse von Teamarbeitskontexten. Psychologie des Alltaghandelns, 4, 22–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, V., Kluge, A., & Ritzmann, S. (2012). Flexibility under complexity: Work contexts, task profiles and team processes of high responsibility teams. Employee Relations, 34, 322–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, D. N., Folleso, K., Strand-Volden, F., & Torralba, B. (1995). Development of a situation awareness measure to evaluate advanced alarm systems in nuclear power plant control rooms. Ergonomics, 38, 2394–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. (1998). Cognitive reliability and error analysis method CREAM. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E. (2007). Decision about “What” and decisions about “How”. In M. Cook, J. Noyes, & Y. Masakowski (Eds.), Decision making in complex environments (pp. 3–13). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel, E., & Woods, D. D. (2005). Joint cognitive systems. Foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2003). Training for cooperative work. In M. A. West, D. Tjosvold, & K. G. Smith (Eds.), International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working (pp. 167–184). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. H., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1996). Training for stress exposure. In J. E. Driskell & E. Salas (Eds.), Stress and human performance (pp. 223–256). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keinan, G., & Friedland, N. (1996). Training effective performance under stress: Queries, dilemmas, and possible solutions. In J. E. Driskell & E. Salas (Eds.), Stress and human performance (pp. 257–278). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. A., Calderwood, R., & MacGregor, D. (1989). Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19, 462–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G., McCloskey, M., Pliske, R., & Schmitt, J. (1997). Decision skills training. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st annual meeting (pp. 182–185). Santa Barbara: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., Badura, B., & Rietz, Ch. (2013a). Framing effects of production outcomes, the risk of an accident, control beliefs and their effects on safety-related violations in a production context. Journal of Risk Research. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2013.788059.

  • Kluge, A., & Burkolter, D. (2012, May 10). Training for cognitive readiness: Research issues and experimental designs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. doi:10.1177/1555343412446483.

  • Kluge, A., & Burkolter, D. (2013). Training for cognitive readiness: Research issues and experimental designs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 7, 96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., Burkolter, D., & Frank, B. (2012, October). Being prepared for the infrequent: A comparative study of two refresher training approaches and their effects on temporal and adaptive transfer in a process control task. Proceedings of the human factors and Ergonomics Society 56th annual conference (pp. 2437–2441). Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., Grauel, B., & Burkolter, D. (2013b). Job aids: How does the quality of a procedural aid alone and combined with a decision aid affect motivation and performance in process control? Applied Ergonomics, 44, 285–296.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., & Schüler, K. (2007). Experience management by means of simulator trainings in high reliability organizations – Re-enacting critical incidents and learning from experience – Examples from nuclear power plants and oil refineries. In N. Gronau (Ed.), 4th conference on professional knowledge management – Experiences and vision (pp. 77–84). Berlin: Gito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A., Schüler, K., & Burkolter, D. (2008). Simulatortrainings für Prozesskontrolltätigkeiten am Beispiel von Raffinerien: Psychologische Trainingsprinzipien in der Praxis. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 62(2), 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluwe, R. H. (1997). Acquisition of knowledge in the control of a simulated technical system. Le Travail Humain, 60, 61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognition, learning, and thinking styles (pp. 193–210). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (1983). Towards an understanding of the role of experience in the evolution from novice to expert. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 19, 497–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski, S. W. J., & DeShon, R. P. (2004). A psychological fidelity approach to simulation-based training: Theory, research and principles. In S. G. Schiflett, L. R. Elliot, E. Salas, & M. D. Coovert (Eds.), Scaled worlds: Development, validation and applications (pp. 75–100). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S. (1997). Procedural violations – Causes, costs and cures. In F. Redmill & J. Rajan (Eds.), Humans factors in safety – Critical systems (pp. 287–318). London: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrienboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. A., Mason, S. T., & Crow, B. E. (2012). Assessment and management of acute combat stress on the battlefield. In C. H. Kennedy & E. A. Zillmer (Eds.), Military psychology. Clinical and operational applications (pp. 73–92). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. M., & Rouse, W. B. (1985). The effects of type of knowledge upon human problem solving in a process control task. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-15, 698–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. E., & Fletcher, J. D. (2002). Cognitive readiness (No. IDA-P-3735). Institute for Defense Analyses, Alexandria, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A., Wilk, S. L., Mullen, E. J., & Wanek, J. E. (1997). Employee development: Issues in construct definition and investigation antecedents. In J. K. Ford, S. W. J. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger, E. Salas, & M. S. Teachout (Eds.), Improving training effectiveness in work organizations (pp. 153–189). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 7–15). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hare, D., Wiggins, M., Williams, A., & Wong, W. (1998). Cognitive task analyses for decision centered design and training. Ergonomics, 41, 1698–1718.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orasanu, J. M., & Backer, P. (1996). Stress and military performance. In J. E. Driskell & E. Salas (Eds.), Stress and human performance (pp. 89–126). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, T. C., & Shepherd, A. (2004). Using task analysis for information requirements specification: The sub-goal template (SGT) method. In D. Diaper & N. A. Stanton (Eds.), The handbook of task analysis for human-computer interaction (pp. 347–365). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, T. C., Richardson, J., & Shepherd, A. (1998). Enhancing the usability of a task analysis method: A notation and environment for requirements specification. Ergonomics, 41, 1642–1663.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C. R., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). Teamwork in multi-person systems: A review and analysis. Ergonomics, 43, 1052–1075.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J., James, N., & Ahmed, A. (2006a). Human processes of control: Tracing the goals and strategies of control room teams. Ergonomics, 49, 1395–1414.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J., James, N., Ahmed, A., & Halliday, P. (2006b). Observational assessment of situation awareness, team differences and training implications. Ergonomics, 49, 393–417.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pliske, R. M., McCloskey, M. J., & Klein, G. (2001). Decision skills training: Facilitating learning from experience. In E. Salas & G. Klein (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making (pp. 37–53). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podmore, R., Robinson, M., Sadinsky, M., & Sease, R. (2008, July 20–24). A virtual instructor for simulator training. In Proceedings, IEEE Power & Energy Society annual meeting, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. (1998). Achieving a safe culture: Theory and practice. Work & Stress, 12(3), 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. (1967). Mental practice: A review and discussion (Part II). Research Quarterly, 38, 264–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzmann, S. (2012). Entwicklung und evaluation von Crew Resource management training for flight attendants. Lengerich: Pabst Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, K. G., Shafer, J. L., & Klein, G. (2006). Professional judgements and “naturalistic decision making”. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 403–419). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, E. M. (2008). Uncovering the requirements of cognitive work. Human Factors, 50, 475–480.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, W. R. (1982). A mixed-fidelity approach to technical training. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 11, 103–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (1997). Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. In M. Quinones & E. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Application of psychological research (pp. 291–322). Washington, DC: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Driskell, J. E., & Hughes, S. (1996). Introduction: The study of stress and human performance. In J. E. Driskell & E. Salas (Eds.), Stress and human performance (pp. 1–46). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., Priest, H. A., & Guthrie, J. W. (2006). Design, delivery, and evaluation of training. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (pp. 472–512). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1999). Automaticity. In R. A. Wilson & F. C. Keil (Eds.), The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences (pp. 63–64). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraagen, J. M., Chipman, S. F., & Shalin, V. L. (2000). Cognitive task analysis. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebok, A. (2000). Team performance in process control: Influences of interface design and staffing levels. Ergonomics, 43, 1210–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Serfaty, D., Entin. E. E., & Johnston, J. H. (1998/3rd print). Team coordination training. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Making decisions under stress. Implications for individual and team training (pp. 221–246). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39, 303–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Zeisig, R. L., McPherson, J., & Acton, B. (1998). Team dimensional training: A strategy for guided team self-correction. In J. A. Cannon-Bowers & E. Salas (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Implications for individual and team training (pp. 271–297). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuffler, M. L., DiazGranados, D., & Salas, E. (2011). There’sa Science for That Team Development Interventions in Organizations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 365–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Ohly, S. (2004). Learning at work: Training and development. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 19, 249–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stammers, R. B. (1981). Skill retention and control room tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society annual meeting (pp. 168–172). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadham, S. V. (1980). Learning to select a needs assessment strategy. Training and Development Journal, 30, 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (2009). Cognitive psychology. Belmont: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoffregen, T. A., Bardy, B. G., Smart, L. J., & Pagulayan, R. J. (2003). On the nature and evaluation of fidelity in virtual environments. In L. J. Hettinger & M. Haas (Eds.), Virtual and adaptive environments: Applications, implications, and human performance issues (pp. 111–128). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, R. (2002). Duality of the mind. A bottom-up approach toward cognition. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, R., Merrill, E., & Peterson, T. (2001). From implicit skills to explicit knowledge: A bottom-up model of skill learning. Cognitive Science, 25, 203–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, R., Slusarz, P., & Terry, C. (2005). The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process approach. Psychological Review, 112, 159–192.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (2006). How the human cognitive system deals with complexity. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments. Theory and research (pp. 13–27). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I., Beard, R. L., McNall, L. A., & Salas, E. (2010). Informal learning and development in organizations. In S. W. J. Kozlowski & E. Salas (Eds.), Learning, training, and development in organization (pp. 303–332). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitdewillingen, S., Waller, M. J., & Zijlstra, F. R. H. (2010). Team cognition and adaptability in dynamic settings: A review of pertinent work. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25, 293–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bosch, K., & Riemersma, J. B. J. (2004). Reflections on scenario-based training in tactical command. In S. G. Schiflett, L. R. Elliot, E. Salas, & M. D. Coovert (Eds.), Scaled worlds: Development, validation and applications (pp. 1–22). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vicente, K. J., Mumaw, R. J., & Roth, E. M. (2004). Operator monitoring in a complex dynamic work environment: A qualitative cognitive model based on field observations. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 5, 359–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von der Heyde, A., Presting, P., Kluge, A., & Badura, B. (2012). Social norms and their impact on safety-related rule violations in process control: Does it make a difference if operators are aware that residents will be injured? In Proceedings of the human factors and Ergonomics Society 56th annual conference, Boston 2012 (pp. 243–247). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, M. J., Gupta, N., & Giambatista, R. C. (2004). Effects of adaptive behaviors and shared mental models on control crew performance. Management Science, 50, 1534–1544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexley, K. N., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Developing and training human resources in organizations (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D., & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C., Hutchins, S., Carolan, T., & Cumming, J. D. (2012). Attention and cognitive resources load in training strategies. In A. F. Healy & L. E. Bourne Jr. (Eds.), Training cognition. Optimizing efficiency, durability, and generalizability (pp. 67–88). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegmann, D. A., & Shappell, S. A. (2001). A human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents using the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS). Office of Aviation Medicine/FAA. ADA387808. Retrieved December 8, 2012, from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a387808.pdf.

  • Wildman, J. L., Thayer, A. L., Pavlas, D., Steward, J. E., & Howse, W. R. (2012). Team knowledge research: Emerging trends and critical needs. Human Factors, 54, 84–111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xinwen, B., Erping, W., Ying, Z., Dafei, M., & Jing, R. (2006). Developmental characteristics of two types of shared mental models. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 598–606.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business and Organizational Psychology, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Annette Kluge

Authors
  1. Annette Kluge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kluge, A. (2014). Training Design for Instance-Based Learning – The “Staged Process Control Readiness Training” (SPCRT). In: The Acquisition of Knowledge and Skills for Taskwork and Teamwork to Control Complex Technical Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5049-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation