Skip to main content

The Institutionalisation of a Wild Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 546 Accesses

Part of the book series: Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development ((DTSD,volume 1))

Abstract

An overview of the history of demography and of its institutionalisation in France and an analysis of the main actors of demography in teaching and research are required in order to understand the development of demography and the tensions in the field. This chapter has two purposes: firstly, to examine the development of demography as an academic discipline and the place of the demography of development within the discipline as a whole and, secondly, to consider the opportunities for interdisciplinary dialogue provided by institutionalisation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In French universities, professors (professeurs) and senior lecturers (maîtres de conférences) are ranked as enseignants-chercheurs (literally teacher-researchers). The conjunction of the two terms is designed to imply that university academics are required to devote half of their time to research and the other half to teaching. The term was introduced in 1984 as a result of a reform of French higher education and was designed in part to reassert the value of research among university ­academics. It is worth noting that in France, the assessment of university academics is based exclusively on their research output (especially their publications), while teaching and administrative duties play little or no role in the promotion process, despite the fact that these encroach significantly on the required amount of time devoted to research. The status of French university academics was altered in 2009 to take better account of the full range of tasks that they are required to perform (i.e. teaching and supervision, distance learning, integration of graduates, international cooperation, training courses, tutoring and pastoral care, promotion of research, dissemination of scientific culture). The consideration given to non-research activities is the responsibility of individual departments in accordance with the law on the autonomy of universities.

    Source: http://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/cid25131/statut-des-enseignants-chercheurs-les-nouveautes-du-decret.html

  2. 2.

    It should be kept in mind that researchers at INED have the status of civil servants with lifelong guarantee of employment and total immovability. To that extent, their situation is exactly the same as that of academics teaching and doing research in University Paris Descartes, Paris Ouest Nanterre and a few others in France. The institutional context is far less flexible than in the USA.

  3. 3.

    This historical overview is based on research conducted by Alain Desrosières (1985, 1993, 1997).

  4. 4.

    In the nineteenth century, these statistics became the comptes de la justice civile et criminelle.

  5. 5.

    The Physiocrats were a notable exception since they believed in the importance of informing public opinion. But this can be explained by their desire to extend their influence through the ‘true’ laws of political economy (Charbit 2010).

  6. 6.

    Dominique Schnapper (2001b) also showed that the policy of nationalisation has its limitations and is part of the ideology of nation states aiming to unify its regions and to create a common national identity. For instance, the use of the French language only became compulsory in the twentieth century.

  7. 7.

    Jacques Peuchet, Description topographique et statistique de la France (1810–1811) and Mémoires tirés des archives de la police (1837–1838).

  8. 8.

    In 1912, the surgeon Alexis Carrel was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

  9. 9.

    Paul Leroy-Beaulieu (1843–1916) was a liberal economist who supported and inspired the policy of colonial expansion of the Third Republic promoted by Jules Ferry. In 1874, Leroy-Beaulieu published De la colonisation chez les peuples modernes. His attachment to the principles of liberal economics was never an obstacle to his social concerns. For example, Leroy-Beaulieu studied working-class wages, local administration in England and France and female labour in the industrial sector.

  10. 10.

    Michel Chevalier (1806–1879) was a French economist and politician. A former student of the famous Ecole Polytechnique and a member of the Council of State, Chevalier obtained the chair of political economy at the Collège de France in 1841, before becoming a member of the Académie des sciences morales et politiques and a senator in 1860. A Saint-Simonian at the beginning of his career, Chevalier later became a liberal and an advocate of free trade. For a detailed study of Michel Chevalier, see Yves Charbit (1981: 193–208).

  11. 11.

    The chair was held (among others) by Louis Chevalier. A former student of the prestigious Ecole Normale Supérieure and a historian, Chevalier worked as a researcher at the INED and taught general history and demography at the Paris Institute of Political Studies. In 1951, Chevalier defended a doctoral thesis entitled Les Fondements économiques et sociaux de l’histoire de la région parisienne at the Sorbonne. He was subsequently elected to the Collège de France, where he held the chair of the history and social structures of Paris and the Paris region from 1952 to 1981. It was thanks to the appeal he made to his former fellow student, President Georges Pompidou, that the INED was not suppressed in the early 1970s. Gérard Calot then became director of the INED.

  12. 12.

    Anecdote recounted in personal correspondence by an INED researcher.

References

  • Bourdieu, P., & Chatrier, R. (2010). Le sociologue et l’historien. Marseille: éditions INA et Agone & Raisons d’agir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, Y., & Lutfalla, M. (dir.). (1991). L’économie politique en France au XIXe siècle. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charbit, Y. (1981). Du malthusianisme au populationnisme. Les économistes français et la population 1840–1870 (Travaux et document, cahier n°90). Paris: PUF-INED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charbit, Y. (2010). The classical foundations of population thought. From Plato to Quesnay. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chasteland, J.-C., & Roussel, L. (1997). Les contours de la démographie au seuil du XXIe siècle (pp. 57–94). Paris: INED-PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (1985). Histoire de formes: statistiques et sciences sociales avant 1940. Revue Française de Sociologie, 26(2), 277–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (1993). La politique des grands nombres. Paris: éditions la Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (1997). Démographie, science et société: le cas français. In Les contours de la démographie au seuil du XXIème siècle, Actes du colloque international 1945–1995: un demi-siècle de démographie. Bilan et perspectives (pp. 57–93), 25–27 novembre 1995, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drouard, A. (1983). Les trois âges de la Fondation française pour l’étude des problèmes humains. Population, 38(6), 1017–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garlot, E. (1968). L’enseignement de la démographie en France. Population, 23(2), 499–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lash, C. (2002). Le seul et vrai paradis: une histoire de l’idéologie du progrès et de ses critiques. Paris: Flammarion (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. (1970a). Notes sur l’histoire de la quantification en sociologie: les sources, les tendances, les grands problèmes. In Philosophie des sciences sociales (pp. 75–162). Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. (1970b). L’apport conceptuel des analyses d’enquête à la sociologie générale. In Qu’est-ce que la sociologie? Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bras, H. (2000a). L’invention des populations, biologie, idéologie et politique. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bras, H. (2000b). La naissance de la mortalité. L’origine politique de la statistique et de la démographie. Paris: Gallimard-Le Seuil-Hautes Etudes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, G. (1996). Le développement. Histoire d’une croyance occidentale. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnapper, D. (2001b). De l’Etat-nation au monde transnational. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales, 17(2), 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taguieff, P.-A. (2004). Le sens du progrès: une approche historique et philosophique. Paris: Champs Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Petit, V. (2013). The Institutionalisation of a Wild Science. In: Counting Populations, Understanding Societies. Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5046-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics