Skip to main content

General Nature of Intentionality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl

Part of the book series: Phaenomenologica ((PHAE,volume 207))

  • 1680 Accesses

Abstract

Translating Husserl’s Erlebnis as “awareness,” Cairns first describes how each awareness in a stream of mental life is aware of preceeding awarenesses, which it thus “retains,” and possible future awarenesses that it “protends” and then he describes the synthesis based thereupon whereby identical objects transcendent of mental life are also constituted. Appresentation as distinguished from presentation, the relation of mind and body, and other matters are also raised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At this point there is a “?” in the margin in the “A” version.” – L.E.

  2. 2.

    Marginal Note: “Checked with original MS only to here: October 22, 1940. Continued, Feb. 6, 1954.” – L.E.

  3. 3.

    Marginal Note: “Question marks referring to the previous phrase.” – L.E.

  4. 4.

    Marginal note: “This seems to deny by implication that internal time is continuous. It has, I believe, no basis in Husserl—or in the phenomena.” – L.E.

  5. 5.

    The point is singled out from the concrete extent by the epithets “ur-present” “ur-impressional.” (German “ur” is equivalent to Greek “proto.”)

  6. 6.

    Strictly, of course, the consciousness is temporally modified and so retained, qua horizon and, with the consciousness, its inseparable object as intended.

  7. 7.

    Chapter 7.

  8. 8.

    The world “transcendent” is applied to objects that are not parts of consciousness. Thus, for example, Memorial Hall is a transcendent object, but the seeing or remembering of Memorial Hall is an immanent “object.” Objects of the latter sort are spoken of as immanent whether they be parts of psychological consciousness or parts of transcendentally reduced consciousness.

  9. 9.

    A series of nine asterisks separate the following from what went before, but is not used again and is deleted here. – L.E.

  10. 10.

    The usual connotation of the word “act” is misleading. Not all “acts” in Husserl’s sense are actions, activities, deeds, in the sense in which willing, deducing, and adding are actions. Though all the objects called acts have, as we shall see, characteristics which make the name not arbitrary, the description given above is the essential definition.

  11. 11.

    Cf. p. 22.

  12. 12.

    The precise definition of the act is not easy. Husserl, in the Méditations Cartésiennes, speaks of transcendental consciousness as a single act, in that it is a single synthetic unity, whose form is transcendental time. This synthetic unity includes, then, the acts of the transcendental onlooker as well as those executed in the natural attitude. The unity of the one act would be correlate of the unity of the ego, as subject of all its acts. The sense (of the word “act”) here involved differs, then, from the sense which we have defined. The latter, notwithstanding its discrepancy with this one passage, seems to be implicit in Husserl’s general use of the word, and hence has been used as the basis of our exposition. In either sense, the act is an important unity in transcendental consciousness; but only in the sense which we have defined, does it isolate unities for analysis.

  13. 13.

    There is one type of exception to this: other transcendental streams of consciousness are intended by me as having each a distinct transcendental time-form immanent to itself, but transcendent of my transcendental consciousness. These transcendental times of other subjectivities are intended (intended in my transcendental consciousness) as outside world-time, just as the transcendental time of my own mind consciousness is.

  14. 14.

    There is a question mark over the word “phase.” – L.E.

  15. 15.

    See Chaps. 13 and 21.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cairns, D., Embree, L. (2013). General Nature of Intentionality. In: Embree, L. (eds) The Philosophy of Edmund Husserl. Phaenomenologica, vol 207. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5043-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics