Abstract
Psychology has achieved hegemonic status as virtually the default discipline in the study of education. Yet, its achievements are not always as impressive as its claims. Crucially, as it is generally conceived and practised, it does not offer us much help in making sense of what may be called our ‘mindedness’, the logic of our souls: how we turn away from life and from plenitude. Although some philosophers have addressed this, there is a case for saying that the vital discipline for education is less philosophy, especially philosophy of the Anglophone tradition, than a kind of theology. Negative theology, as it is called, gives us ways of understanding education’s aporias, its idealistic longings and how we are to think of cultivating responsibility to other people. It helps us to see that education is always and rightly bound never to be good enough, always destined to fail.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berliner, D. C. (2006). Educational psychology: Searching for essence throughout a century of influence. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology(2nd ed., pp. 3–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Calfee, R. (2006). Educational psychology in the 21st century. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology(2nd ed., pp. 29–42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Caputo, J. (1997). The prayers and tears of Jacques Derrida: Religion without religion. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
De Vries, H. (1999). Philosophy and the turn to religion. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Donaldson, M .C. (1978). Children’s minds.London: Taylor & Francis.
Freud, S. (2002). Analysis terminable and interminable. In S. Freud (Ed.), Wild analysis(A. Bance, Trans.). London: Penguin.
Hanich, L. B., & Deemer, S. (2005). The relevance of educational psychology in teacher education. The Clearing House, 78(5), 189–191.
Kierkegaard, S. (1998). The point of view(H. V. Hong & E. H. Hong, Ed. & Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lear, J. (2003). Therapeutic action. New York: Other Press.
Nettle, D. (2005). Happiness: The science behind your smile. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Robbins, J. W. (2004). In search of a non-dogmatic theology. Aurora, CO: Davies Group.
Rubenstein, M.-J. (2008). Strange wonder: The closure of metaphysics and the opening of awe. New York: Columbia University Press.
Santner, E. (2001). On the psychotheology of everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Weil, S. (1951). Reflections on the right use of school studies with a view to the love of God. In S. Weil (Ed.), Waiting for God(E. Crauford, Trans.). New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
Weil, S. (1978). Lectures on philosophy(H. Price, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, R. (2013). The Theology of Education to Come. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: The Attraction of Psychology. Educational Research, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5037-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5038-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)