Skip to main content

Indicator-Based Method for Assessing Organic Farming Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Given the crisis of productivism, organic agriculture has in recent years a remarkable development. It appears in fact as a form of sustainable agriculture alternative to conventional agriculture. But despite this strong development and the growing importance, there is a lack of methods for assessing the sustainability of organic farms. There was an abundant production of methods for assessing the sustainability of farms; but most often, these methods are intended for conventional farming systems and therefore take little account of the specificity of organic farming. In this chapter, we propose a method for assessing farm’s sustainability suitable for organic farming. This method relies on one side of the agricultural sustainability principles and the other side on the principles and characteristics of organic farming. The results of application of this method on a sample of farms in the Midi-Pyrenees region (southern France) show that it takes into account very well the agro-ecological and socio-territorial specificities of organic farming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The plan aims to increase of surfaces to reach in 2012, 6% of cultivated areas, to provide aids for conversion, farmers’ training, etc.

  2. 2.

    http://www.ifoam.org/about_ifoam/principles/index.htm (accessed in January 2010).

References

  • Agence Bio. (2009). L’agriculture biologique en France: Chiffres clés 2008. Retrieved December 2011, from www.agencebio.org

  • Andreoli, M., & Tellarini, V. (2000). Farm sustainability evaluation: Methodology and practice. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 77, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstaller, C., Guichard, L., Keichinger, O., Girardin, P., Galan, M. B., & Gaillard, G. (2009). Comparison of methods to assess sustainability of agricultural systems: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gafsi, M., Legagneux, B., Nguyen, G., & Robin, P. (2006). Towards sustainable farming systems: Effectiveness and deficiency of the French procedure of sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 90, 226–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard, O., & Hubert, B. (2002). Le développement durable et la recherche scientifique à l’INRA. Rapport intermédiaire de mission. Paris: INRA Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J. W., & Jones, J. W. (1996). A systems framework for characterizing farm sustainability. Agricultural Systems, 51, 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. C., & Keoleian, G. A. (2003). Assessing the sustainability of the US food system: A life cycle perspective. Agricultural Systems, 76, 1007–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikerd, J. E. (1997). Understanding and managing the multi-dimensions of sustainable agriculture. Presentation held at the Southern Region sustainable agriculture professional development program workshop, SARE regional training consortium, Gainesville, FL, January 15, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropff, M. J., Bouma, J., & Jones, J. W. (2001). Systems approaches for the design of sustainable agro-systems. Agricultural Systems, 70, 369–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness, B., Urbel-Piirsalu, E., Anderberg, S., & Olsson, L. (2007). Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecological Economics, 60, 498–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacini, C., Wossink, A., Giesen, G., Vazzana, C., & Huirne, R. (2003). Evaluation of sustainability of organic, integrated and conventional farming systems: A farm and field-scale analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 95, 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., & Seaton, R. A. F. (1996). Integrative research and sustainable agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 50, 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D., Woodhouse, P., Young, T., & Burton, M. (2001). Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agriculture practice. Ecological Economics, 39, 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadok, W., Angevin, F., Bergez, J. E., Bockstaller, C., Colomb, B., Guichard, L., Reau, R., & Dore, T. (2007). Ex ante assessment of the sustainability of alternative cropping systems: Implications for using multi-criteria decision-aid methods. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 27, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydorovych, O., & Wossink, A. (2008). The meaning of agricultural sustainability: Evidence from a conjoint choice survey. Agricultural Systems, 98, 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Calker, K. J., Berentsen, P. B. M., Romero, C., Giesen, G. W. J., & Huirne, R. (2006). Development and application of multi-attribute sustainability function for Dutch dairy farming systems. Ecological Economics, 57, 640–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Fliert, E., & Braun, A. R. (2002). Conceptualizing integrative, farmer participatory research for sustainable agriculture: From opportunities to impact. Agriculture and Human Values, 19, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werf, H., & Petit, J. (2002). Evaluation of the environmental impact of agriculture at the farm level: A comparison and analysis of 12 indicator-based methods. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93, 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken, P. (1997). A methodical way of prototyping integrated and ecological arable farming systems (I/EAFS) in interaction with pilot farms. European Journal of Agronomy, 7, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilain, L. (2008). La méthode IDEA: indicateurs de durabilité des exploitations agricoles: guide d’utilisation. Dijon: Educagri Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. P. G. (1997). Assessing the economic consequences of sustainability in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 64, 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahm, F., Viaux, P., Vilain, L., Girardin, P., Mouchet C. (2004, November). La méthode IDEA: une méthode de diagnostic pour passer du concept de durabilité à son évaluation à partir d’indicateurs. (Paper presented at Partnership for European Environmental Research – PEER Conference, Helsinki).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, P., & Kachele, H. (1999). Modelling multiple objectives of land use for sustainable development. Agricultural Systems, 59, 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Gafsi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gafsi, M., Favreau, J.L. (2013). Indicator-Based Method for Assessing Organic Farming Sustainability. In: Marta-Costa, A., Soares da Silva, E. (eds) Methods and Procedures for Building Sustainable Farming Systems. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5003-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics