Abstract
Campus crime at colleges and universities has resulted in a call for more safety and preventive measures from policymakers, students, to citizens. While research highlights students’ fear on campus crime, few studies have examined this topic from a spatial and cognitive perspective. In this chapter the authors report on a novel methodology to compare campus crime data with participants’ self-reported cognitive fear of crime maps. In this study, 313 undergraduate students provided fear of crime maps at a middle-sized university in the southwestern United States. The students’ perceptions were aggregated and compared to university crime statistics to produce five bivariate maps. These maps represent perceived fear of crime in relation to four broadly observed crime categories namely burglary, theft, harassment, and sexual assault. In this research effort, students’ fear of crime is aligned with data for actual burglary and theft occurrences but their fear is exaggerated for harassment and sexual assault. The implications of this study are multifold, extending from potential safety improvements and better decision-making (e.g., aid law enforcement to target specific areas for crime monitoring) to developing educational workshops to dispel myths and present facts on campus safety. The introduced bivariate mapping technique provides another step towards safer university and college campuses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Astor R, Meyer H, Behre W (1999) Unowned places and times: maps and interviews about violence in high schools. Am Educ Res J 36(1):3–42
Balkin S (1979) Victimization rates, safety and fear of crime. Soc Probl 26(3):343–358
Banai R (1999) A methodology for the image of the city. Environ Behav B Plan Des 26(1):133–144
Baumer TL (1985) Testing a general model of fear of crime: data from a National sample. J Res Crime Delinq 22(3):239–255
Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1993) Nodes, paths, and edges: considerations of the complexity of crime and the physical environment. J Environ Psychol 13:3–28
Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1995) Criminality of place: crime generators and crime attractors. Eur J Crim Policy Res 3(3):5–26
Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL, Molumby T (1977) Perceptions of crime in a dreadful enclosure. Ohio J Sci 77(6):256–261
Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL, Seagrave J (1995) Crime and fear at a Canadian university. In: Fisher BS, Sloan JJ (eds) Campus crime: legal social, and policy perspectives. Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, pp 123–155
Brower AM, Carroll L (2007) Spatial and temporal aspects of alcohol-related crime in a College Town. J Am Coll Heal 55(5):267–275
Clarke RV, Eck JE (2005) Crime analysis for problem solvers in 60 small steps. U.S. Department of Justice, Center for Problem Oriented Policing. Retrieved 24 Sept, 2012, from http://www.popcenter.org/library/reading/PDFs/60steps.pdf
Carter SD (2001) Campus violence symposium – introduction. Stetson Law Rev 32(1):1–6
Downs R, Stea D (1973) Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: process and products. In: Downs R, Stea D (eds) Image and environment: cognitive mapping and spatial behavior. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, pp 8–26
Fisher BS, Nasar JL (1995) Fear spots in relation to microlevel physical clues: exploring the overlooked. J Res Crime Delinq 32(2):214–239
Fisher BS, Sloan JJ (1993) University responses to the University Campus Security Act of 1990: evaluating programs designed to reduce campus crime. J Secur Adm 16(1):67–80
Fisher BS, Sloan JJ (2003) Unraveling the fear of victimization among college women: is the ‘shadow of sexual assault hypothesis’ supported? Justice Q 20(3):633–659
Fisher BS, Sloan JJ (eds) (2007) Campus crime, 2nd edn. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield
Fisher BS, Sloan JJ, Wilkins DL (1995) Fear and perceived risk of victimization in an urban university setting. In: Fisher BS, Sloan JJ (eds) Campus crime: legal, social, and policy perspectives. Charles C Thomas, Springfield
Fisher BS, Sloan J, Cullen F, Lu C (1997) The on-campus victimization patterns of students: implications for crime prevention by students and post-secondary institutions. In: Lab SP (ed) Crime prevention at a crossroads. Anderson Publishing, Cincinnati, pp 101–126
Fisher BS, Hartman JL, Cullen FT, Turner MG (2002) Making campuses safer for students: the clery act as a symbolic legal reform. Stetson Law Rev 32(1):61–89
Fox JA, Burstein H (2010) Violence and security on campus: from preschool through college. Praeger, Santa Barbara
Golledge RG (1999) Wayfinding behavior: cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore
Gould P, White R (1974) Mental maps. Penguin, Harmondsworth
Gregory DE (2001) Crime on campus. Compliance, liability, and safety. Campus Law Enforc J 31(4): 27–29, 31–32
Gregory DE, Janosik SM (2002) The Clery Act: how effective is it? Perceptions from the field – the current state of the research and recommendations for improvement. Stetson Law Rev 32(1):7–59
Groff ER (2007) ‘Situating’ simulation to model human spatio-temporal interactions: an example using crime events. Trans GIS 11(4):507–530
Groff ER, La Vigne NG (2001) Mapping an opportunity surface of residential burglary. J Res Crime Delinq 38:257–278
Hale C (1996) Fear of crime: a review of the literature. Int Rev Victimol 4(1):79–150
Hudge MA (2000) The campus security act. J Secur Adm 23(2):25–27
Jackson J (2006) Introducing fear of crime to risk research. Risk Anal 26(1):253–264
Janosik SM (2001) The impact of campus crime Awareness Act of 1998 on student decision making. NASPA J 38(3):348–360
Janosik SM (2002) Parent’s views on the Jeanne Clery Campus Crime Act and campus safety. Educational Policy Institute of Virginia Tech, Blacksburg
Janosik SM, Gehring DD (2001) The impact of the Jeanne Clery disclosure of campus crime Statistics Act on college student behavior. Educational Policy Institute of Virginia Tech, Blacksburg
Janosik SM, Gregory DE (2003) The Clery Act and its influence on Campus Law enforcement practices. NASPA J 41(1):182–199
Janosik SM, Gregory DE (2009) The Clery Act, Campus Safety, and the perceptions of senior student affairs officers. NASPA J 46(2):208–227
Kearney A, Kaplan S (1997) Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people: The conceptual content cognitive map (3CM). Environ Behav 29(5):579–617
Kitchin RM (1994) Cognitive maps: what are they and why study them? J Environ Psychol 14(1):1–19
Kitchin RM, Freudschuh S (2000) Cognitive mapping: past, present and future. Routledge, London
Kuipers B, Tecuci D, Stankiewicz B (2003) The skeleton in the cognitive map: a computational and empirical exploration. Environ Behav 35(1):81–106
Lewis DA, Maxfield MG (1980) Fear in the neighborhoods: an investigation of the impact of crime. J Res Crime Delinq 17(2):160–189
Lipka S (2009) In campus-crime reports, there’s little safety in the numbers. Chron High Educ 55(21):A1
McConnell EH (1997) Fear of crime on campus: a study of a Southern University. J Secur Adm 20:22–46
McNeal LR (2007) Clery Act: road to compliance. J Pers Eval Educ 19(3–4):105–113
Nasar JL, Fisher BS (1993) Hot spot’s of fear and crime: a multitude-method investigation. J Environ Psychol 13:187–206
O’Kane J, Fisher R, Green L (1994) Mapping campus crime. Secur J 5(3):172–179
Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. Geo Books, Norwich
Ratcliffe JH, McCullagh MJ (1999) Hotbeds of crime and the search for spatial accuracy. Geogr Syst 1(4):385–398
Rengert G, Lowell R (2005) Combating campus crime with mapping and analysis. Crime Mapp News 7(1):1–5
Robinson MB, Mullen KL (2001) Crime on campus: a survey of space users. http://www.pscj.appstate.edu/campuscrime.html. Last viewed on16 Feb 2012
Robinson MB, Roh S (2001) Crime on campus: a survey of space users. Crime Prev Community Saf Int J 3(4):33–46
Robinson M, Roh S (2007) Spatial aspects of calls for service at a Regional Comprehensive University. In: Fisher BS, Sloan JJ (eds) Campus crime: legal, social, and policy perspectives. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield
Rund JA (2002) The changing context of campus safety. New Dir Stud Serv 99:3–10
Sherman L, Weisburd D (1995) General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: a randomized, controlled trial. Justice Q 12(4):625–648
Singh RR (1996) Adapting geographic information systems to sketch planning needs. Unpublished Master thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Starkweather S (2007) Gender, perceptions of safety and strategic responses among Ohio University students. Gend Place Cult 14(3):355–370
Tseng CH, Duane J, Hadipriono F (2004) Performance of campus parking garages in preventing crime. J Perform Constr Facil 18(1):21–28
Vann IB, Garson GD (2001) Crime mapping and its extension to social science analysis. Soc Sci Comput Rev 19(4):471–479
Wilcox P, Jordan PE, Pritchard AJ (2007) A multidimensional examination of campus safety victimization, perceptions of danger, worry about crime, and precautionary behavior among college women in the Post-Clery Era. Crime Delinq 53(2):219–254
Wilson RE (2007) The impact of software on crime mapping – an introduction to a special journal issue of social science computing review on crime mapping. Soc Sci Comput Rev 25(2):135–142
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fuhrmann, S., Huynh, N.T., Scholz, R. (2013). Comparing Fear of Crime and Crime Statistics on a University Campus. In: Leitner, M. (eds) Crime Modeling and Mapping Using Geospatial Technologies. Geotechnologies and the Environment, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4997-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4997-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4996-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4997-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)