Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Ethics ((BRIEFSETHIC,volume 2))

  • 1698 Accesses

Abstract

Economic, social, legal, and political factors have combined in recent years to effect major changes in medical practice and health care policy. Concern for patient rights and patient autonomy have transformed the practice of medicine which is rooted in the doctor-patient relationship. A change took place between 1965 and 1970 which put into question what this relationship is supposed to accomplish. Prior to this date medical ethics was generally thought of do’s and don’ts for the physician and the primary principle was to benefit the patient, giving authority to the physician to coerce, deceive and ‘do things impermissible’ in other human relationships. After that date the patient’s benefit was not the only moral principle but of special importance was the principle of autonomy, often thought of as the right to self-determination. Medical ethics was no longer the field of physicians but also of philosophers, theologians, people involved in health care and the layman.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Shem S., The House of God, Black Swan Books, 1992, p. 89.

  2. 2.

    Brody B.A., Holleman W.L., “Ethics in Family Practice”, in

    Textbook of Family Practice, 5th edition, ed. Rakel., Saunders, 1995, p. 153.

  3. 3.

    Veatch R.M. The Patient-Physician RelationThe Patient as Partner, Part 2, Indiana 1991, p. 1

    Pellegrino E.D., “The Four Principles and the Doctor-Patient Relationship.: the Need for a Better Linkage”, in Principles of Health Care Ethics, ed. Gillon, Wiley 1994, p. 362

    Cassell E.J., The Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine, Oxford 1991, p. 66.

  4. 4.

    Brody, H. “The Physician/Patient Relationship.”, in Medical Ethics, ed. Veatch R.M., Jones and Bartlett 1989, p. 67.

  5. 5.

    Veatch R.M. The Patient-Physician Relation, p. 1.

  6. 6.

    Ibid., p. 2.

  7. 7.

    Idem.

  8. 8.

    Ibid., p. 3.

  9. 9.

    Pellegrino E.D., “Toward a Virtue Based Normative Ethics for the Health Profession”, in Kenn. Inst. of Ethics J., Vol.5, No.3, p. 267.

  10. 10.

    Ibid., p. 274.

  11. 11.

    Beauchamp. T.L., Childress J.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, Oxford 1979.

  12. 12.

    Beauchamp. T.L., “The ‘Four-principles’ Approach”, in Principles of Health Care Ethics, p. 3.

  13. 13.

    Idem.

  14. 14.

    Idem.

  15. 15.

    Clouser K.D., Gert B., “A Critique of Principlism”, in J. of Medicine and Philosophy 15, p. 219–236.

  16. 16.

    Childress J.F.,”Principles-Oriented Bioethics. An Analysis and Assessment from within”, in A Matter of Principles?, ed. DuBose et al., Trinity Press International 1994, p. 73.

  17. 17.

    Jonsen A.R., A Matter of Principles? p. XV.

  18. 18.

    A report to write “ethical principles” for the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research, following the 1974 National Research Act (Public Law 93–348).

  19. 19.

    Ibid., p. XV

  20. 20.

    Engelhardt H.T., Jr., Foundations of Bioethics, 1994.

  21. 21.

    Wulff H.R. Against the Four Principles: a Nordic View, in Principles of Health Care, p. 277–286.

  22. 22.

    Pellegrino E.D., “The Four Principles and the Doctor-Patient Relationship.: the Need for a Better Linkage”, p. 360–362.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., p. 362.

  24. 24.

    The term ‘tradition’ is used as defined by MacIntyre. It incorporates culture, religions, systems of Justice and also professions. MacIntyre A. After Virtue Duckworth, Indiana. University of Notre Dame Press, 1984 p. 204–225.

  25. 25.

    Brody B., Holleman WALL “Ethics in Family Practice” in

    Textbook of Family Practice, p. 153.

  26. 26.

    O’Rourke K. (Editorial) in, Health Care Ethics USA Vol. 6 No.1, 1998.

  27. 27.

    Idem.

  28. 28.

    Norris P.F. “Antibiotic Prescribing: Ethical Concerns”, in, Health Care Ethics USA Vol. 6 No.1, 1998, p. 4–5.

  29. 29.

    Trotter G., “Responding to Unreasonable Requests for EMS”, in Health Care Ethics USA Vol. 5 No.3 1997, p. 4–5.

  30. 30.

    Gambon, E. Trinita’. Modello Sociale, Citta Nuova Editrice, Rome, 1999

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Mallia .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mallia, P. (2013). Introduction. In: The Nature of the Doctor-Patient Relationship. SpringerBriefs in Ethics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4939-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4939-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4938-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4939-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics