Abstract
This chapter explores the impact of the process of restratification on professional practice and medical regulation by looking at the implementation of revalidation. In doing so, this chapter acts as a necessary introduction to the exploration of the handling of fitness to practice cases in Chap. 7. Chapter 5 ended by noting that in addition to state intervention to reform medical regulation and re-establish the General Medical Council as an independent regulatory body, over the last decade, medical elites themselves have increasingly acted to strengthen peer review and appraisal mechanisms as they have sought to maintain professional self-regulatory privileges within the broader transformative context that is the emergence of the new neo-liberal governing conditions associated with the risk society. It was highlighted that the esoteric nature of medical expertise means that regardless of calls for greater consumer and inter-professional input into medical regulation, some semblance of medical control will be retained as peer appraisal remains the key mechanism by which the quality of medical work can be judged and its quality assurance assured. This chapter explores the consequences of this for the development of revalidation. This is the process by which the competence of medical practitioners will be quality assured in the United Kingdom. This chapter outlines how revalidation will operate when it is implemented sometime after late 2012. For comparative purposes, this chapter also outlines recent international trends in the quality assurance of medical practitioner’s continued competence. In doing so, this chapter highlights how a move towards increased professional accountability seems to characterise medical governance frameworks internationally. This provides some empirical support for the restratification thesis. Yet this chapter also points out that it is important to note that the situation internationally is more complex than the restratification thesis allows. The need to empirically explore this point further is taken up in Chap. 8. End-of-chapter self-study tasks are provided so the reader can engage in further study in relation to chapter contents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boulay, C. (2000). Revalidation for doctors in the United Kingdom: The end or the beginning? BMJ, 320, 1490.
Burrage, M., & Torstendahl, R. (Eds.). (1990). Professions in theory and practice. London: Sage Publications.
Cain, F. E., Benjamin, R. M., & Thompson, J. N. (2005). Obstacles to maintaining licensure in the United States. British Medical Journal, 350, 1443–1445.
Calman, K. (1993). Hospital doctors: Training for the future. London: Department of Health.
Calman, K. (1994). Continuing medical education. London: Department of Health.
Cato, G. (2008). Relicensing, recertification and regulation. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 14, 1–2.
Catto, G. (2006). GMC news 3. London: GMC.
Chamberlain, J. M. (2009). Portfolio-based appraisal: Superficial or useful? British Journal of Hospital Medicine, 70(11), 176–177.
Charlton, R., Coomber, J., & Thistlewaite, J. E. (2011). Re-licensing of general practitioners using the current UK revalidation proposals: A cross-sectional study. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 87, 807–813.
Davies, M. (2007). Medical self-regulation: Crisis and change. Aldershot: Asj Publishing Limited.
Detsky, A., & Haylor, C. D. (2003). Canada’s health system- reform delayed. The New England Journal of Medicine, 349, 804–810.
Duffey, F. D., & Zipes, D. P. (2004). The future of certification and recertification. American Journal of Medicine, 117, 140–144.
Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
General Medical Council. (1993). Tomorrows doctors. London: GMC.
General Medical Council. (2010a). Revalidation update: Making revalidation work for doctors. London: GMC.
General Medical Council. (2010b). Revalidation: The way ahead. London: GMC.
Gerace, R. V. (2003). The shipman inquiry: International seminar statement by Dr Gerace. London: The Shipman Inquiry Report.
House of Commons Health Committee. (2011a). Revalidation of doctors: Fourth report. London: The Stationary Office.
House of Commons Health Committee. (2011b). Revalidation of doctors: General medical council’s response to the committee’s fourth report. London: The Stationary Office.
Irvine, D. (2003). The doctors tale: Professionalism and the public trust. London: Radcliffe Medical Press.
Kelly, B. D. (2010). Changing governance, governing change: Medical regulation in Ireland. International Journal of Medical Science, 179, 5–7.
Lomdarts, M. J. M. H. (2003). External peer review by medical specialists in legal perspective. European Journal of Health Law, 33, 191–213.
Lupton, D. (2011). Medicine as culture (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Lynch, M. (2010). Commentary on Shepherd and Cameron and continuation of the revalidation debate. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 651–654.
Mekur, S., Elias, M., Long, M., & Mkee, M. (2010). Physician revalidation in Europe. Clinical Medicine, 8, 371–375.
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. (2004). Health care in Finland: Brochure II. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
NHS Revalidation Support Team. (2009). Strengthening NHS appraisal to support revalidation in England. London: Department of Health.
Peck, C., McCall, M., McLaren, B., & Rotem, L. (2000). Continuing medical education and continuing professional development: International comparisons. British Medical Journal, 320, 432–435.
Pugh, M. (2003). Refining the paradigm: The transition from recertification to maintenance of certification. Annals of Family Medicine, 1, 56–58.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, R. (1992). The GMC on performance: Professional self-regulation is on the line. British Medical Journal, 304, 1257–1258.
Smith, R. (1993). The end of the GMC? The government not the GMC is looking at underperforming doctors. British Medical Journal, 307, 957–958.
Smith, J. (2005). Shipman: Final report. London: Department of Health.
Stacey, M. (1992). Regulating British medicine. London: Wiley.
Stacey, M. (2000). The general medical council and professional self-regulation. In D. Gladstone (Ed.), Regulating doctors (pp. 45–65). London: Institute for the Study of Civil Society.
Starke, I., & Brownbridge, H. (2010). Revalidation: A royal college of physicians perspective. Clinical Medicine, 10, 321–322.
Swinkels, L. A. (1999). Reregistration of medical specialists in the Netherlands. British Medical Journal, 319, 1191–1192.
The Secretary of State for Health. (2007). Trust, assurance and safety: The regulation of health professionals in the 21st century. London: The Stationary Office.
Tito, F. (1996). Compensation and professional indemnity in health care: Final report. Sydney: Australian Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chamberlain, J.M. (2012). Restratification and Revalidation: United Kingdom and International Perspectives. In: The Sociology of Medical Regulation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4896-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4896-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4895-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4896-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)