Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Zoo Talk pp 179–204Cite as

Zoo Field Trip Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 1243 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the rationale behind the zoo field trip and the components of a successful zoo field trip design. There are five stages of a zoo visit that may be used as a framework for organizing a zoo field trip: (1) orientation, (2) concentrated or focused looking, (3) leisure looking, (4) completion, and (5) consolidation. The concentrated or focused looking stage involves the students focusing on learning tasks or activities. This chapter intertwines focused looking stage with the six levels of learning in Bloom’s Taxonomy (Krathwohl, 2002) to define a Zoo Cognition Hierarchy. The Zoo Cognition Hierarchy may be used to analyze the activities teachers and zoos ask students to complete during a zoo visit. If the questions or worksheets do not address the interactions suggested by the Zoo Cognition Hierarchy, higher-order thinking most likely will not occur. Suggestions are given for field trip design, training chaperones, and developing useful field trip activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, W. (1973). Is their journey really necessary? The Times Educational Supplement, 3041, 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., & Lucas, K. (1997). The effectiveness of orienting students to the physical features of a science museum prior to visitation. Research in Science Education, 27(4), 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Lucas, K. B., Ginns, I. S., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Development of knowledge about electricity and magnetism during a visit to a science museum and related post-visit activities. Science Education, 84(4), 658–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Piscitelli, B., & Everett, M. (2008). Competing agendas: Young children's museum field trips. Curator: The Museum Journal, 51(3), 253–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D., Piscitelli, B., Weier, K., Everett, M., & Taylor, C. (2002). Children’s museum experiences: Identifying powerful mediators of learning. Curator, 45(3), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Association of Science Education. (2001). Be safe! Health and safety in primary school science and technology (3rd ed.). Hatfield, UK: Association for Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L. (2007). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 367–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bätz, K., Wittler, S., & Wilde, M. (2010). Differences between boys and girls in extracurricular learning settings. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(1), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, N. W. (1998). A focus on art museum/school collaborations. Art Education, 51(2), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, A., & Makela, C. (2010). Making the most of museum field trips. In Creating the inclusive museum. Edinburgh, UK: Hudson House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. H., Krockover, G. H., & Woods, P. R. (1982). Creative museum methods and educational techniques. Springfield, IL: Thomas Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. A. (1997). The culture of denial: Why the environmental movement needs a strategy for reforming universities and public schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulunuz, M., & Jarrett, O. (2010). Developing an interest in science: Background experiences of preservice elementary teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(1), 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. (1943). An experimental evaluation of the school excursion. Journal of Experimental Education, 12, 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox-Petersen, A. M., Marsh, D. D., Kisiel, J., & Melber, L. M. (2003). Investigation of guided school tours, student learning, and science reform recommendations at a museum of natural history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 200–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, D. (1944). The contributions of the excursion to understanding. Journal of Educational Research, 38, 201–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, S. K., Passmore, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Learning on zoo field trips: The interaction of the agendas and practices of students, teachers, and zoo educators. Science Education, 94(1), 122–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, S. (2009, January). A picture is worth 1,000 words: Using digital cameras captivates second-grade learners at the zoo. Science and Children, 46(5), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • de White, T. G., & Jacobson, S. K. (1994). Evaluating conservation education programs at a South American zoo. Journal of Environmental Education, 25(4), 18–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Adelman, L. M. (2003). Investigating the impact of prior knowledge and interest on aquarium visitor learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. Journal of Educational Research, 76(1), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1997). School field trips: Assessing their long-term impact. Curator, 40(3), 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experience and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., Martin, W. W., & Balling, J. D. (1978). The novel field-trip phenomenon: Adjustment to novel settings interferes with task learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(2), 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C. L., Bronnenkant, K., Deans, N. L., & Heimlich, J. E. (2007). Why zoos & aquariums matter: Assessing the impact of a visit. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gennaro, E. (1981). The effectiveness of using previsit instructional materials on learning for a museum field trip experience. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(3), 275–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gennaro, E., Stoneberg, S. A., & Track, S. (1982). Chance or prepared mind? Journal of Museum Education, 7(4), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, L., Breitbarth, P., Brungardt, M., Dorr, C., & Balgopal, M. (2010, February). The view at the zoo: Using a photographic scavenger hunt as the basis for an interdisciplinary field trip. Science Scope, 33(6), 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golick, D. A., Schlesselman, D. M., Ellis, M. D., & Brooks, D. W. (2003). Bumble Boosters: Students doing real science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(2), 149–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1994). Learning to learn in informal settings. Research in Science Education, 24, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (1998). School-museum integrated learning experiences in science: A learning journey. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups. Science Education, 88, 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning-oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81(6), 763–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M., & Pizzini, E. (1979). The effects of combined advance organizers and field experiences on environmental orientations of elementary school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16(4), 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisasola, J., Solbes, J., Barragues, J., Morentin, M., & Moreno, A. (2009). Students’ understanding of the special theory of relativity and design for a guided visit to a science museum. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2085–2104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton-Ekeke, J. (2007). Relative effectiveness of expository and field trip methods of teaching on students' achievement in ecology. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1869–1889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, H. W. (1951). An experimental study of the effect of field trips upon the development of scientific attitudes in a ninth grade general science class. Science Education, 35(5), 242–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, E., & Jorde, D. (2001). High school students’ understanding of radiation and the environment: Can museums play a role? Science Education, 85(2), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson, K. (2008). It’s a zoo out there! Students conduct content-rich scientific inquiry using authentic ethological methods. The Science Teacher, 75(2), 44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Museums and the interpretation of visual culture. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howland, A. (1962). How to conduct a field trip. National Council for the Social Studies, How to Do It Series, No 12. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2005). Factors influencing elementary school children’s attitudes toward science before, during, and after a visit to the UK National Space Center. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 53–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D., & Chandler, F. (2009). Pre-service teachers’ fieldtrip to the battleship: Teaching and learning mathematics through an informal learning experience. Issues in the Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 2, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert, S. R. (1985). Attitudes towards animals: Age-related development among children. The Journal of Environmental Education, 16(3), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. F. (2003a). Revealing teacher agendas: An examination of teacher motivations and strategies for conducting museum field trips. Unpublished dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. F. (2003b). Teachers, museums and worksheets: A closer look at a learning experience. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science fieldtrips. Science Education, 89(6), 936–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. (2006a). More than lions and tigers and bears: Creating meaningful field trip lessons. Science Activities, 43(2), 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. (2006b). An examination of fieldtrip strategies and their implementation within a natural history museum. Science Education, 90(3), 434–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. (2006c). Examining teacher choices for science museum worksheets. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. (2007). Examining teacher choices for science museum worksheets. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. F. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: An intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94(1), 95–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krepel, W. J., & Duvall, C. R. (1973). A study of school board policies and administrative procedures for dealing with field trips in school districts in cities with populations over 100,000 in the United States. Research in Education, 8(1), 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krepel, W. J., & Duvall, C. R. (1981). Field trips: A guide for planning and conducting educational experiences. Washington, DC: National Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kromba, A., & Harms, U. (2008). Acquiring knowledge about biodiversity in a museum: Are worksheets effective? Journal of Biological Education, 42(4), 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockheed, M. E. (1985). Sex & ethnic differences in middle school mathematics, science and computer science: What do we know? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallapur, A., Waran, M., & Sinha, A. (2008). The captive audience: The educative influence of zoos on their visitors in India. International Zoo Yearbook, 42, 214–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E., Smith, W. S., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1998). Effect on primary level students of in service teacher: Education in an informal science setting. Journal of Science Teaching, 9(2), 123–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, A. (2004). Engineering active and effective field trips. The Clearing House, 77, 160–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, P. (1985). Worksheet-induced behaviour in the British Museum (Natural History). Journal of Biological Education, 19(3), 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melber, L. (March 2000). Tap into informal science learning. Science Scope, 23, 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen, M. F., & Smart, K. (2007). Free-choice worksheets increase students’ exposure to curriculum during museum visits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1389–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munakata, M. (2005). Exploring mathematics outside the classroom through the field trip assessment. PRIMUS, 15, 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, O. E., Jr., Saunders, C. D., & Garrett, E. (2004). What do children think animals need? Developmental trends. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 545–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, C., Stanoss, R., Jenke, D., & Stowell, S. (2009, September 12–18). Advanced inquiry: Deepening engagement in science and conservation at zoos & aquariums. Paper presented at the Association for Zoos and Aquariums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabors, M., Edwards, L., & Murray, R. (2009). Making the case for field trips: What research tells us and what site coordinators have to say. Education, 129(4), 661–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff, T. R. (1977). The use of field trip courses to strengthen undergraduate geology programs. Journal of Geological Education, 25, 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel, A. (2007). Elements of a winning field trip. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 44(1), 42–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noel, A., & Colopy, M. (2006). Making history field trips meaningful: Teachers’ and site educators’ perspectives on teaching materials. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(3), 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N. (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93(6), 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orion, N., & Hofstein, A. (1991). The measurement of students’ attitudes towards scientific field trips. Science Education, 75(5), 513–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Wadsworth, P., & Black, P. (1992). Processes of life. Liverpool, UK: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, S., & Tesi, R. (2004). Adult’s perception of field trips taken within grades K-12: Eight case studies in the New York metropolitan area. Education, 125(1), 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., Yambor, K. M., & Packard, B. (1998). Hands-on biology: A museum-school-university partnership for enhancing students’ interest and learning in science. The Elementary School Journal, 98(3), 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C. (2010, September 12–16). A program can change the entire field trip. Paper presented at the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C., & Muhs, K. (1994). Field trips and parent chaperones: A study of self-guided school groups at the Monterey Bay Aquarium. Visitor Studies: Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, P. (2008, October). Going to the zoo, zoo, zoo… Paper presented at the National Association of Biology Teachers Conference, Memphis, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, P. (2011, April). Zoo acuity model: Middle level students’ knowledge of zoos. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, P., & Getz, A. (2008). Becoming a spider scientist. Science & Children, 46(3), 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, P., Matthews, C., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2011). Using a field trip inventory to determine if listening to elementary school students’ conversations, while on a zoo field trip, enhances preservice teachers’ abilities to plan zoo field trips. International Journal of Science Education. Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500693.2011.620035, 1–25, iFirst article.

  • Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). What plants and animals do early childhood and primary students’ name? Where do they see them? Journal of Science Education and Technology. Invited article and Special Issue: Early Childhood and Nursery School Education. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/e27121057mqr8542/

  • Pedretti, E. G. (2002). T. Kuhn meets T. Rex: Critical conversations and new directions in science centres and science museums. Studies in Science Education, 37, 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. L. (1992). Designing exhibits that motivate. Association of Science-Technology Centers Newsletter, 20(1), 9–10, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D. L. (1993). Beyond cognition and affect: The anatomy of a museum visit. In A. Benefield, S. Bitgood, H. Shettel, D. Thompson, & R. Williams (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research, and practice, Vol. 6, Proceedings of the 1993 visitor studies conference. Jacksonville, AL: Center for Social Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poetter, T. S. (2006). The zoo trip: Objecting to objectives. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(4), 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, S., & Hein, G. E. (1991). More than a field trip: Science programmes for elementary school groups at museums. International Journal of Science Education, 13(5), 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, W. H. (2005). Inquiry-based environments for the inclusion of students with exceptional learning needs. Remedial and Special Education, 26(5), 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebar, B. (2010). Teachers’ sources of knowledge for field trip practices. Paper presented at The National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2010 Annual Meeting, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebar, B. M., & Enochs, L. G. (2010). Integrating environmental education field trip pedagogy into science teacher preparation. In A. Bodzin, S. Weaver, & B. Klein (Eds.), The inclusion of environmental education in science teacher education (pp. 111–126). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Preston Montford, Shropshire, UK: Field Studies Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riddle, W. (1980). A study of adolescent visitors to the human biology exhibition. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Chelsea College, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, S. (1980). Informal learning in zoos: Naturalistic studies on family groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, F. (1962). Field trips—Why and how? The American Biology Teacher, 24, 410–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. M., & Matthews, C. E. (2011). The “science” behind a successful field trip to the zoo. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 48(1), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B. (Ed.). (2000). Building museum & school partnerships. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Federation of Museums and Historical Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skop, E. (2008). Creating field trip-based learning communities. Journal of Geography, 107(6), 230–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storksdieck, M. (2001). Differences in teachers’ and students’ museum field-trip experiences. Visitor Studies Today, 4(1), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2007). School visits to natural history museums: Teaching or Enriching? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 747–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talboys, G. K. (1996). Using museums as an educational resource: An introductory handbook for students and teachers. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J., Buchanan, J., & Schwab, S. (2006). An integrative summer field course in geology and biology for K-12 instructors and college and continuing education students at Eastern Washington University and beyond. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(5), 588–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tofield, S., Coll, R. K., Vyle, B., & Bolstad, R. (2003). Zoos as a source of free choice learning. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21(1), 67–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trainin, G., Wilson, K., Wickless, M., & Brooks, D. (2005). Extraordinary animals and expository writing: Zoo in the classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, L. U. (2007). Teaching science in museums: The pedagogy and goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91(2), 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1992). Zoo education. International Zoo News Journal, 39(3), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1993). We’re all going to the zoo tomorrow, zoo tomorrow: Children’s conversations at animal exhibits at London and St. Louis Zoos. Paper given at Visitor Studies Association Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S. (1994). Attitudes of primary school children to animals in a zoo. In J. Nicholson & A. Podberscek (Eds.), Issues in research in companion animal studies. Study no. 2. Glasgow, UK: Society for Companion Animal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1999). Stages of a zoo visit. International Zoo News, 46(6), 343–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnicliffe, S., Lucas, A., & Osborne, J. (1997). School visits to zoos and museums: A missed educational opportunity? International Journal of Science Education, 19(9), 1039–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009). Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education, 53, 286–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner, B., & Jensen, E. (2010). Science learning at the zoo: Evaluating children’s developing understanding of animals and their habitats. Psychology and Society, 3(1), 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. (1997). The status of science and mathematics teaching in the United States. National Institute for Science Education, 1(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickless, M., Brooks, D. W., Abuloum, A., Mancuso, B., Heng-Moss, T. M., & Mayo, L. (2003). Our zoo to you: A zoo’s “animal loan” program lets students and teachers experience the benefits of observing animals up close without the worry. Science and Children, 41(1), 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wishart, J., & Triggs, P. (2010). MuseumScouts: Exploring how schools, museums and interactive technologies can work together to support learning. Computers & Education, 54(3), 669–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolins, I. S., Jensen, N., & Ulzheimer, R. (1992). Children’s memories of museum field trips: A qualitative study. Journal of Museum Education, 17(2), 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xanthoudaki, M. (1998). Is it always worth the trip: The contribution of museum and gallery educational programmes to classroom art education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(2), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

    Dr. Patricia G. Patrick

  2. Institute of Education, University of London, London, England UK

    Dr. Sue Dale Tunnicliffe

Authors
  1. Dr. Patricia G. Patrick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Sue Dale Tunnicliffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patrick, P.G., Tunnicliffe, S.D. (2013). Zoo Field Trip Design. In: Zoo Talk. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4863-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation