Skip to main content

Introducing Microscale Experimentation in Volumetric Analysis for Pre-service Teachers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chemistry Education and Sustainability in the Global Age

Abstract

Experiments are considered a subset of practical or laboratory work, which is a didactic method of learning and practicing all the activities involved in chemistry. Central to the teaching-learning approach in the chemistry curriculum is the mastery of scientific skills, which comprise process skills, manipulative skills, and thinking skills. Students require the hands-on practical and personal laboratory experiences to acquire the skills. Volumetric analysis is one of the important concepts in chemistry that is applied in practical chemistry for the Malaysian Pre-Service teachers (PPISMP) program. However, practical chemistry classes are normally conducted in groups of four or five students for several reasons, which include cost, safety, waste disposal, and preparation time. The size of the groups limits participation to only one or two students. This can result in a low level of acquisition of scientific skills and knowledge among the students. The traditional style practicals also leave little room for creativity because opportunities for students to be involved in the activities are limited. Introducing the microscale chemistry approach at the pre-service level would help overcome these problems since this technique allows the students to conduct experiments individually. It is an environmentally safe technique with a pollution-prevention approach accomplished by using miniature glassware and significantly reduced amounts of chemicals. This study was conducted to introduce microscale chemistry experimentation in the PPISMP practical science syllabus and evaluate the feasibility of conducting this approach with students. The survey involved 39 students enrolled in the PPISMP program majoring in science. Findings show that the microscale chemistry approach produced significant advantages in terms of cost, waste, and time as well as precision. In addition, students rated this approach positively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdullah, M., Ismail, Z., & Mohamed, N. (2005). Microscale experimentation in teaching chemistry. In M. Ismail, S. Osman, & H. M. Yunus (Eds.), Proceedings for seminar Pendidikan JPPG 2005 – Education for sustainable development, Universiti Sains Malaysia, August (pp. 96–103). George Town, Malaysia: School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah, M., Mohamed, N., & Ismail, Z. (2006). Secondary school teachers’ feedback on microscale chemistry experimentation. In Y. J. Lee, A. L. Tan, & B. T. Ho (Eds.), Proceedings of the international science education conference ISEC, November (pp. 55–65). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J. D. (1999). Hands-on practical chemistry for all. Pure Applied Chemistry, 71(5), 817–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, S., Conway, K., & Guseman, P. (1995). Making the most of microscale: Using microchemistry as a tool to transform teaching. The Science Teacher, 65(1), 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint, E. B., Kortz, C. L., & Taylor, M. A. (2002). Microscale pH titrations using an automatic pipet. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6), 705–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1990). Overview. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student lab and the science curriculum (pp. 3–26). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education: Thirty years of experience with deve­opments, implementation and research. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 5(3), 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelkar, S. L., & Dhavale, D. D. (2000). Microscale experiments in chemistry: The need of the new millennium. Resonance, 5(10), 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, P., Ealy, J., & Pickering, M. (1991). Microscale laboratory at the high school level: Time efficiency and student response. Journal of Chemical Education, 68(10), 869–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Microscale Chemistry Centre. (1993). Why microscale chemistry [online]. Available http://www.silvertech.com/microscale.html. Accessed 28 June 2005.

  • Patterson, T. Y. (1998). Microscale chemistry benefits the environment and lab practices. Earth Medicine, 55(3), 1, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. N., Stauffer, M. T., & Henry, J. L. (2003). Microscale quantitative analysis of hard water samples using an indirect potassium permanganate redox titration. Journal of Chemical Education, 80(1), 65–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. M., McGowan, C. B., Szafran, Z., & Pike, R. M. (1998). A modified microburet for microscale titration. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(3), 371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. M., McGowan, C. B., Szafran, Z., & Pike, R. M. (2000). A comparative study of microscale and standard burettes. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(5), 625–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M. M., Szafran, Z., & Pike, R. M. (1999). Microscale chemistry and green chemistry: Complementary pedagogies. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(12), 1684–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallmadge, W., Homan, M., Ruth, C., & Bilek, G. (2004). A local pollution prevention group collaborates with a high school intermediate unit bringing the benefits of microscale chemistry to high school chemistry labs in the Lake Erie watershed. Chemical Health & Safety, 11(4), 30–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermaak, I. (1997). Evaluation of cost-effective microscale equipment for a hands-on approach to chemistry practical work in secondary schools. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermaak, I., & Bradley, J. (2003, September). New technologies for effective science education break the cost barrier. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburg, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mashita Abdullah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abdullah, M., Mohamed, N., Ismail, Z.H. (2013). Introducing Microscale Experimentation in Volumetric Analysis for Pre-service Teachers. In: Chiu, MH., Tuan, HL., Wu, HK., Lin, JW., Chou, CC. (eds) Chemistry Education and Sustainability in the Global Age. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4860-6_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics