Skip to main content

Application of Mind Maps and Mind Manager to Improve Students’ Competence in Solving Chemistry Problems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter describes research using mind maps and the software Mind Manage to improve students’ abilities to solve chemistry problems during a transition period of chemistry instruction in China. Mind maps were first introduced and put into practice in chemistry elective courses by the author in 2005. In the 2008 fall semester, 19 students from the 10th grade started to learn the theory of mind maps and the use of Mind Manager, applying them to the study of solving chemical problems in Nanjing No. 3 High School. The aim was to explore and enhance students’ problem-solving competence. The course adopted the processes of “cognitive reception – imitation practice – self exploration” so as to observe the influence of this new way of thinking on students’ change in regard to solving chemistry problems. Students were prompted to think divergently and comprehensively and to apply multidisciplinary knowledge to solving chemistry problems. The results indicate that students can consciously apply mind maps to solving chemistry problems and showed a variety of representation methods. The students’ ability to solve problems was improved. A significant difference appeared between the control group and the experimental group. The results indicate that mind maps and Mind Manager can effectively improve competence and achievement of students in chemistry.

This chapter presents research results of the project “Action Research on Applying Mind Map to Optimize Teaching Effectiveness Under the New Curriculum,” which is sponsored by the Nanjing Middle-Young Tip-Top Talents Program (2008), “Study and Reflection of Teaching Result on Applying Mind Map to Optimize Teaching Effectiveness Under the New Curriculum”; the eleventh Five-Year Provincial Educational Programming Research Topic: “Action Research on (Chemistry) Instructional Strategies, Pattern, and Excellent Case Under the New Curriculum”(No. D/2006/01/093).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Table 1 is date analysis of chemical mid-term exam in Grade 10, in Nov. 2008. The significant value is 0.05.

  2. 2.

    Table 2 is date analysis of chemical final exam in Grade 10, in Jan. 2009. The significant value is 0.05.

  3. 3.

    Figure 3 indicates the mindmap which is applicated for solution through MINDMANAGER by Student A.

  4. 4.

    Figure 4 indicates the mind map which is made for the same question after one-semester training by Student A.

References

  • Ashmore, A. D., Fraze, J., & Case, R. J. (1979). Problem solving and problem solving networks in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 56(6), 377–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D.P. (1978). In defence of advanced organizer: A reply to the critics. Review of Educational Research 48(2), 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, T. (2004). Mind map–radioactivity thinking. Beijing, China: World Book Public.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, D. (1998). The Complexity of Chemistry and Implication for Teaching.International Handbook of Science Education. Netherlands: Kluwer Publishers, 233–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking, problem solving, cognition (2nd ed.). New York: W H Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learners as information processors: Legacies and limitations of educational psychology’s second. Educational Psychologist 31(3–4), 151–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education of People’s Republic of China. (2005). Chemistry curriculum standard of high school. Hubei, China: Hubei Education Public.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinde, W. (2006). The study of strategy training on students chemical problem solving in high school. Zhongqing, China: Southwest University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhen, L. (2006). The integration research of information technology with new chemical curriculum – the mind map and mind manager with chemical modules learning. Teaching and Learning Reference for Middle School Chemistry, 279, 47–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Lu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lu, Z., Zou, Z., Zhang, Y. (2013). Application of Mind Maps and Mind Manager to Improve Students’ Competence in Solving Chemistry Problems. In: Chiu, MH., Tuan, HL., Wu, HK., Lin, JW., Chou, CC. (eds) Chemistry Education and Sustainability in the Global Age. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4860-6_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics