Abstract
In this chapter, the results of all the studies presented in this book are summarized. What are the lessons learned? Based on the lessons learned, we developed a data use framework. In this framework, data use is influenced by several enablers and barriers (e.g., the school organization context, data and data systems, and user characteristics). Data can be used in a desirable as well as undesirable manner, but what happens a lot in schools as well is that data are not used. Policy may also influence the use of data, as well as its enablers and barriers. Finally, we argue that if data are used in a desirable manner this can lead to school leader, teacher, and student learning (e.g., increased student achievement).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Breiter, A., & Light, D. (2006). Data for school improvement: Factors for designing effective information systems to support decision-making in schools. Educational Technology & Society, 9(3), 206–217.
Carlson, D., Borman, G., & Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Education and Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 378–398.
Chen, E., Heritage, M., & Lee, J. (2005). Identifying and monitoring students’ learning needs with technology. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 309–332.
Comenius project using data for improving school and student performance. (2011). Comparative analysis data use in Germany, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Poland and England. Retrieved from: http://www.datauseproject.eu/home/documents. Accessed 4 Jan 2012
Datnow, A., Park, V., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007). Achieving with data. How-high performing school systems use data to improve instruction for elementary students. San Francisco: Center on Educational Governance University of California.
Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2004). High-stakes accountability in urban elementary schools: challenging or reproducing inequality. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1145–1176.
Earl, L. M. (August 7–9, 2005). From accounting to accountability: Harnessing data for school improvement. Paper presented at the ACER research conference, Melbourne.
Earl, L. M., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world. Harnessing data for school improvement. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Ehren, M. C. M., & Swanborn, M. S. L. (2012). Strategic data use in accountability systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 257–280.
Feldman, J., Tung, R. (April 10–14, 2001). Whole school reform: How schools use the data-based inquiry and decision making process. Paper presented at the American educational research association conference, Seattle.
Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Yuan, K. (2009). Standards-Based Reform in the United States: History, Research, and Future Directions. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. Retrieved http://www.rand.org/pubs/reprints/RP1384. Accessed 15 Nov 2011
Handelzalts, A. (2009). Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
Huffman, D., & Kalnin, J. (2003). Collaborative inquiry to make data-based decisions in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 569–580.
Kelly, A., Downey, C and Rietdijk, W. (2010). Data dictatorship and data democracy: Understanding professional attitudes to the use of pupil performance data in English secondary schools. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.
Kerr, K. A., Marsh, J. A., Ikemoto, G. S., Darilek, H., & Barney, H. (2006). Strategies to promote data use for instructional improvements: Actions, outcomes, and lessons from three urban districts. American Journal of Education, 112, 496–520.
King, M. B. (2002). Professional development to promote schoolwide inquiry. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(3), 243–257.
Lachat, M.A., & Smith, S. (2005). Practices that support data use in urban high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10(3), 333–349.
Lai, M. K., & McNaughton, S. (2008). Raising student achievement in poor, urban communities through evidence-based conversations. In L. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Evidence-based conversations to improve educational practices (pp. 13–27). Netherlands: Kluwer/Springer Academic.
Lai, M. K., McNaughton, S., Amituanai-Toloa, M., Turner, R., & Hsiao, S. (2009). Sustained acceleration of achievement in reading comprehension: The New Zealand experience. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 30–56.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & McElheron-Hopkins, C. (2006). The development and testing of a school improvement model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(4), 441–464.
Levin, J. A., & Datnow, A. (2012). The principal role in data-driven decision making: using case-study data to develop multi-mediator models of educational reform. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 179–202.
Louis, K., & Marks, H. (1998). Does professional learning community affect the classroom teachers’ work and student experience in restructured schools? American Journal of Education, 106(4), 532–575.
Mingchu, L. (2008). Structural equation modeling for high school principals’ data-driven decision making: An analysis of information use environments. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 603–634.
Robinson, V. M. J, & Lai, M. K. (2006). Practitioner research for educators: A guide to improving classrooms and schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
Robinson, V. M. J., Phillips, G., & Timperley, H. (2002). Using achievement data for school-based curriculum review: A bridge too far? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1(1), 3–29.
Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lisey, M. W. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 482–496.
Schildkamp, K., & Teddlie, C. (2008). School performance feedback systems in the USA and in the Netherlands: A comparison. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(3), 255–282.
Schildkamp, K., & Handelzalts, A. (2011, April). Data teams for school improvement. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, New Orleans, USA.
Sharkey, N. S., & Murnane, R. J. (2006). Tough choices in designing a formative assessment system. American Journal of Education, 112, 572–588.
Sutherland, S. (2004). Creating a culture of data use for continuous improvement: a case study of an Edison project school. The American Journal of Evaluation, 25(3), 277–293.
Tokar, D. M., Fischer, A. R., & Mezydlo Subich, L. (1998). Personality and vocational behavior: A selective review of the literature, 1993–1997. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53, 115–153.
Tolley, H. & Shulruf, B. (2009). From data to knowledge: the interaction between data management systems in educational institutions and the delivery of quality education. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1199–1206.
Verhaeghe, G., Vanhoof, J., Martin, V., & van Petegem, P. (2010). Using school performance feedback: Perceptions of primary school principals. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(2), 167–188.
Visscher, A. J. (2002). A framework for studying school performance feedback systems. In A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds.), School improvement through performance feedback (pp. 41–72). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V.
Wayman, J. C., & Stringfield, S. (2006a). Data use for school improvement: School practices and research perspectives. American Journal of Education, 112, 463–468.
Wayman, J. C., & Stringfield, S. (2006b). Technology-supported involvement of entire faculties in examination of student data for instructional improvement. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 549–571.
Wayman, J. C., Midgley, S., Stringfield, S. (April 11–15, 2005). Collaborative teams to support data-based decision making and instructional improvement. Paper presented at the American educational research association conference, Montreal.
Wayman, J. C., Cho, V., & Johnston, M. T. (2007). The data-informed district: A districtwide evaluation of data use in the Natrona County School District. Austin: The University of Texas.
Weiss, C.H. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 21–33.
Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259.
Young, V. M. (2006). Teachers’ use of data: Loose coupling, agenda setting, and team norms. American Journal of Education, 112, 521–548.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schildkamp, K., Lai, M. (2013). Conclusions and a Data Use Framework. In: Schildkamp, K., Lai, M., Earl, L. (eds) Data-based Decision Making in Education. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4815-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4816-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)