Abstract
What exactly was Evangelista Torricelli up to when, in 1644, he took mercury filled tubes and turned them upside down in other mercury filled tubs? A canonical story anchored by the larger historiographical edifice of the “Scientific Revolution” holds that Torricelli was using a new instrumental experimental approach to natural philosophy to demonstrate and measure the weight of atmospheric air. Within this frame, Torricelli’s mercury esperienza as he called it heralds the birth of modern experimental science through his invention of the first modern barometer. This paper questions this traditional narrative by re-interpreting the archival foundations upon which this account is based. In particular, it stresses the gaps between the rather slim documentary record of Torricelli’s work and the canonical interpretation of it built by the “Scientific Revolution” literature. It also uses other documentary contexts available in the same archive to give a different, though insistently historical, account of Torricelli’s motivations for and conceptualization of his labors. The paper does not conclude by claiming a new and definitive revisionist interpretation of Torricelli’s mercury esperienza, but by suggesting instead that the emphatically historical but also interpretively flexible approach to Torricelli’s work pursued in this paper exemplifies a “Baroque” approach to the history of science, one that can be useful in generating fresh interpretive insights about the early history of modern science.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
1612. Il Vocabolario degli Accademici della Crusca. Venice: Alberti.
Accolti, Pietro. 1625. Lo Inganno degl’occhi, Prospettiva pratica di Pietro Accolti gentilhuomo fiorentino. Florence: Pietro Cecconcelli.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2007. Infancy and history: On the destruction of experience (trans: Heron, Liz). London and New York: Verso.
Alberti, Leon Battista. 1980. Ludi mattematici. Parma: Guanda.
Andersen, Kirsti. 2007. The geometry of an art: The history of the mathematical theory of perspective from Alberti to Monge. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bacon, Francis. 1999. The New Atlantis. In Francis Bacon: Selected philosophical works, ed. Rose-Mary Sargent. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Battaglia, Salvatore. 1961. Grande Dizionario della Lingua Italiana, 20 vols. Turin: Unione Tipografico.
Belting, Hans. 2011. Florence and Baghdad Renaissance Art and Arab Science, (trans: Schneider, Debarah Lucas) Cambridge, MA: Belking.
Benjamin, Walter. 2009. The origin of German tragic drama (trans: John Osborne). New York: Verso.
Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2006. Thinking with objects. The transformation of mechanics in the seventeenth century. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Biagioli, Mario. 1993. Galileo courtier. The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bos, Henk J.M. 2001. Redefining geometrical exactness: Descartes’ transformation of the early modern concept of construction. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bos, Henk J.M. 2004. Philosophical challenges from history of mathematics. In New trends in the history and philosophy of mathematics, ed. Tinne Hoff Kjeldsen, Stig Andur Pedersen, and Lise Marianne Sonne-Hansen, 51–66. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
Boschiero, Luciano. 2007. Experiment and natural philosophy in seventeenth-century Tuscany: The history of the Accademia del Cimento. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bredekamp, Horst. 2001. Gazing hands and blind spots: Galileo as draftsman. Science in Context 14: 153–192.
Bredekamp, Horst. 2007. Galilei der Künstler: Die Zeichnung, der Mond, die Sonne. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Camerota, Filippo. 2010. Linear perspective in the age of galileo: Ludovico Cigoli’s Prospettiva pratica. Florence: Leo Olschiki.
Clark, Stuart. 2009. Vanities of the eye: Vision in early modern European culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, H.Floris. 1994. The scientific revolution: A historiographical inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Damisch, Hubert. 1994. The origin of perspective (trans: Goodman, John). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Damisch, Hubert. 2002. A theory of /Cloud/. Toward a history of painting (trans: Lloyd, Janet). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
Dati, Carlo. 1663. Lettere a Filaleti di Timauro Antiate, Della vera storia della Cicloide, e della famosissima esperienza dell’argento vivo, 24 Gennaio 1662. Florence: All’Insegna della Stella.
Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and experience. The mathematical way in the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
De Gandt, François (ed.). 1987. L’Oeuvre de Torricelli: Science Galiléenne et nouvelle géometrie. Nice: La Lambrusque.
De Waard, Cornelis. 1936. L’Expérience barométrique, ses antecedents et ses explications. Thouars: Deux-Sevres.
Edgerton, Samuel Y. 1984. Galileo, Florentine “disegno,” and the “strange spottednesse” of the moon. Art Journal 44(1): 225–232.
Edgerton, Samuel Y. 2009. The mirror, the window, and the telescope: How Renaissance linear perspective changed our vision of the universe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Elkins, James. 1996. The poetics of perspective. Ithaca: Cornel University Press.
Findlen, Paula. 1993. Controlling the experiment: Rhetoric, court patronage, and the experimental method of Francesco Redi. History of Science 31: 35–64.
Findlen, Paula. 1996. Possessing nature: Museums, collecting, and scientific culture in early modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2010. Baroque optics and the disappearance of the observer. Journal of the History of Ideas 71(2): 191–217.
Galluzzi, Paolo. 1980. Il Mecenatismo Mediceo e le Scienze. In Idee, Istituzioni, Scienza, ed Arti nella Firenze dei Medici, ed. C. Vasoli. Florence: Giunti Mantelli.
Galluzzi, Paolo (ed.). 2001. Scienziati a Corte; l’arte della sperimentazione nell’Accademia Galileiana del Cimento. Livorno: Sillabe.
Ivins, William M. 1938. On the rationalization of sight; with an examination of three Renaissance texts on perspective. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
Jay, Martin. 1994. Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kemp, Martin. 1992. The science of art: Optical themes in Western art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kircher, Athanasius. 1650. Musurgia universalis sive Ars magna consoni et dissoni in X libros digesta. Rome: Francesco Corbelletti.
Knowles Middleton, W.E. 1964. The history of the barometer. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lindberg, David C. 1976. Theories of vision from Al-kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maignan, Emmanuel. 1653. Cursus philosophicus concinnatus ex notissimis cuique principiis, ac praesertim quod res physicus instauratas ex lege Naturae sensatis experimentis passim comprobata. Toulouse: R. Bosc.
Maffioli, Cesare S. 1994. Out of Galileo: The science of waters, 1628–1718. Rotterdam: Erasmus Publishing.
Mali, Joseph. 2003. Mythistory: The making of a modern historiography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mancosu, Paolo, and Enzio Vailati. 1991. Torricelli’s infinitely long solid and its philosophical reception in the seventeenth century. Isis 82: 50–70.
Marr, Alex. 2011. Between Raphael and Galileo: Mutio Oddi and the mathematical culture of late Renaissance Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mazauric, Simone. 1998. Pascal, Gassendi, et le problème du vide. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Mersenne, Marin. 1647. Novarum observatorum physico-matheticarum. Paris: Bertier.
Mersenne, Marin. 1977. In Correspondance du P. Marin Mersenne, religieux minime, 16 vols, ed. Mme Paul Tannery, Cornélis de Waard, and René Pintard. Paris: Centre National Scientifique.
Monconys, Balthazar de. 1665. Journal des voyages de M. de Monconys, 3 vols. Lyon: Boissat & Remeus.
Newman, Jane O. 2011. Benjamin’s Library: Modernity, Nation and the Baroque. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Niçeron, Jean-François. 1638. La perspective curieuse, ou La magie articielle des effets merveilleux de l’optique par la vision directe. Paris: P. Billiane.
Petit, Pierre. 1647. Observation touchant le vuide faite pour la première fois en France, contenue en une letter écrite à Monsieur Chanut … par Monsieur Petit le 10 novembre 1646. Avec le discours qui en esté imprimé Pologne sur le mesme sujet en juillet 1647. Paris: Sebastien et Gabriel Cramoisy.
Reeves, Eileen. 1997. Painting the heavens: Art and science in the age of Galileo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thirion, Jean. 1907–1908. “Pascal, l’horreur du vide et la pression atmospherique.” Revue des questions scientifiques. XII: 383–450, XIII: 149–251.
Tribby, Jay. 1991. Dante’s restaurant: The cultural work of experiment in early Tuscany. In The consumption of culture: 1600–1800, ed. Ann Bermingham and John Brewer. London: Routledge.
Tribby, Jay. 1994. Club medici: Natural experiment and the imagineering of ‘Tuscany’. Configurations 2(2): 215–235.
Rougier, Louis. 2010. In De Torricelli à Pascal, ed. Simone Mazauric. Philosophiae Scientiae 14: 2.
Segre, Michael. 1991. In the wake of Galileo. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Sessa, Mirella. 1991. La Crusca e le crusche: il vocabolario e la lessicografia italiana del Sette-Ottocento. Florence: Accademia della Crusca.
Shapin, Steven. 1994. The social history of truth: Civility and science in seventeenth-century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Smith, Pamela. 2004. The body of the Artisan: Art and experience in the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Torricelli, Evangelista. 1919–1944. In Opere di Evangelista Torricelli, 4 vols. in 5, ed. Gino Loria and Giuseppe Vassura. Faenza: G. Montaeri.
Torricelli’s Barometric Experiment. Virtual Museum of the Museo Galileo. http://catalogue.museogalileo.it/multimedia/TorricellisBarometricExperimentText.html
Veltmann, Kim. 1986. Leonardo da Vinci studies I: Linear perspective and the visual dimensions of science and art. Munich: Deutscher Kunstverlag.
Wallace, William. 1984. Galileo and his sources: The heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo’s science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zucchi, Niccoló. 1648. Experimenta vulgata non vacuum probare, sed plenum et antiperistasim instabilire. Rome.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shank, J.B. (2012). What Exactly Was Torricelli’s “Barometer?”. In: Gal, O., Chen-Morris, R. (eds) Science in the Age of Baroque. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 208. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4807-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4807-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4806-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4807-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)