Advertisement

Balancing People, Policies, and Resources in Rural Tibet

  • Geoff ChildsEmail author
  • Melvyn C. Goldstein
  • Puchung Wangdui
Chapter
Part of the Human-Environment Interactions book series (HUEN, volume 1)

Abstract

This chapter examines ways that household-level decisions about reproduction are shaped by available land resources, political discourse on population and impoverishment, and changing perceptions of children’s utility to long-term economic strategies. The research centers on three villages in Shigatse Prefecture of China’s Tibet Autonomous Region and is based on a combination of longitudinal demographic data gathered through surveys and in-depth interviews with parents about social, economic, and political factors that influenced their decisions to limit family size. The first part of the chapter discusses policy changes in the 1980s that dismantled Tibet’s commune system and gave families control over set amounts of arable land, and ensuing processes that led to a sharp reduction in per capita land holdings. The second part of the chapter discusses China’s birth control policy in terms of how it is rooted in a vision to create a modern society and how this policy applies in Tibet. The third part of the chapter documents the timing and magnitude of the recent fertility decline in rural Tibet and links it with (1) the reduction in per capita land holdings, (2) China’s birth control policy, and (3) the changing roles that children play in households’ long-term economic strategies. The concluding section discusses how human-environment interactions are one among several variables involved in the complex reproductive decision-making process in rural Tibet.

Keywords

Birth Control Total Fertility Rate Land Tenure Fertility Decline Marital Fertility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bongaarts, J., & Potter, R. G. (1983). Fertility, biology, and behavior: An analysis of the proximate determinants. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Cain, M. (1985). On the relationship between landholding and fertility. Population Studies, 39, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cain, M. (1986). Landholding and fertility: A rejoinder. Population Studies, 40, 313–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. London: Academic.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, D. L., Pan, W. K. Y., & Bilsborrow, R. E. (2006). Declining fertility on the frontier: The Ecuadorian Amazon. Population and Environment, 28, 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Childs, G. (2008). Tibetan transitions: Historical and contemporary perspectives on fertility, family planning, and demographic change. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Childs, G., Goldstein, M. C., Jiao, B., & Beall, C. M. (2005). Tibetan fertility transitions in China and South Asia. Population and Development Review, 31(2), 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, L.-J., Retherford, R. D., & Choe, M. K. (1986). The own-children method of fertility estimation. Honolulu: East-west Center.Google Scholar
  9. Clay, D. C., & Johnson, N. E. (1992). Size of farm or size of family: Which comes first? Population Studies, 46(3), 491–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleland, J., & Wilson, C. (1987). Demand theories of the fertility transition: an iconoclastic view. Population Studies, 41, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, K., & Blake, J. (1956). Social structure and fertility: An analytical framework. Economic Development and Culture Change, 4(4), 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Easterlin, R. A., & Crimmins, E. M. (1985). The fertility revolution: A supply-demand analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Easterlin, R. A., Alter, G., & Condran, G. (1978). Farms and farm families in new and old areas: The northern states in 1860. In T. Hareven & M. Vinovskis (Eds.), Family and population in nineteenth century America (pp. 22–84). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fjeld, H. (2006). The rise of the polyandrous house: Marriage, kinship and social mobility in rural Tsang, Tibet. Ph.D. dissertation, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  15. Ghimire, D. J., & Hoelter, L. F. (2007). Land use and first birth timing in an agricultural setting. Population and Environment, 28, 289–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldscheider, C. (1971). Population, modernization, and social structure. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein, M. C. (1971). Stratification, polyandry, and family structure in central Tibet. Southwest Journal of Anthropology, 27, 64–74.Google Scholar
  18. Goldstein, M. C. (1981). New perspectives on Tibetan fertility and population decline. American Ethnologist, 8(4), 721–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldstein, M. C., & Beall, C. M. (1991). China’s birth control policy in the Tibet Autonomous Region: Myths and realities. Asian Survey, 31(3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldstein, M. C., Jiao, B., Beall, C. M., & Tsering, P. (2002). Fertility and family planning in rural Tibet. The China Journal, 47, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldstein, M. C., Jiao, B., Beall, C. M., & Tsering, P. (2003). Development and change in rural Tibet: Problems and adaptations. Asian Survey, 43(5), 758–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldstein, M. C., Childs, G., & Wangdui, P. (2008). “Going for income”: A longitudinal analysis of change in farming Tibet, 1997–98 to 2006–07. Asian Survey, 48(3), 514–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldstein, M. C., Childs, G., & Wangdui, P. (2010). Beijing’s “people first” development initiative for the Tibet Autonomous Region’s rural sector—A case study from the Shigatse area. The China Journal, 63, 58–75.Google Scholar
  24. Greenhalgh, S. (1994). Controlling births and bodies in village China. American Ethnologist, 21(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenhalgh, S. (2008). Just one child: Science and policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenhalgh, S., & Winckler, E. A. (2005). Governing China’s population: From Leninist to neoliberal biopolitics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gu, B., Wang, F., & Guo, Z. (2007). China’s local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review, 33(1), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henry, L. (1961). Some data on natural fertility. Eugenics Quarterly, 8, 81–91.Google Scholar
  29. Jensen, E. R. (1990). An econometric analysis of the old-age security motive for childbearing. International Economic Review, 31(4), 953–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jiao, B. (2001). Socio-economic and cultural factors underlying the contemporary revival of fraternal polyandry in Tibet. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
  31. Lee, J., & Wang, F. (1999). One quarter of humanity: Malthusian mythology and Chinese realities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Malthus, T. R. (1989[1803]). An essay on the principle of population. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mueller, E., & Short, K. (1983). Income and wealth as they affect the demand for children in developing countries. In R. Bulatao & R. D. Lee (Eds.), Determinants of fertility in developing countries (pp. 474–517). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  34. Netting, R. M. C. (1965). Household organization and intensive agriculture: The Kofyar case. Africa, 35, 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Netting, R. M. C. (1968). Hill farmers of Nigeria: Cultural ecology of the Kofyar of the Jos Plateau. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  36. Netting, R. M. C. (1993). Smallholders, householders: Farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Netting, R. M. C., Stone, M. P., & Stone, G. D. (1989). Kofyar cash cropping: Choice and change in indigenous agricultural development. Human Ecology, 17, 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nugent, J. B. (1985). The old-age security motive for fertility. Population and Development Review, 11(1), 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Renne, E. P. (1995). Houses, fertility, and the Nigerian land use act. Population and Development Review, 21(1), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schrempf, M. (2008). Planning the modern Tibetan family in China. In V. Houben & M. Schrempf (Eds.), Figurations of modernity: Global and local representations in comparative perspective (pp. 121–151). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Schujter, W. A., & Stokes, C. S. (Eds.). (1984). Rural development and human fertility. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Schujter, W. A., Stokes, C. S., & Poindexter, J. R. (1983). Farm size, land ownership, and fertility in rural Egypt. Land Economics, 59, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shreffler, K. M., & Dodoo, F. N.-A. (2009). The role of intergenerational transfers, land, and education in fertility transition in rural Kenya: The case of Nyeri District. Population and Environment, 30, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stokes, C. S., Schujter, W. A., & Bulatao, R. A. (1986). Is the relationship between landholding and fertility spurious? A response to Cain. Population Studies, 40, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stone, G. D., Johnson-Stone, M. P., & Netting, R. M. C. (1984). Household variability and inequality in Kofyar subsistence and cash-cropping economies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 40, 90–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoff Childs
    • 1
    Email author
  • Melvyn C. Goldstein
    • 2
  • Puchung Wangdui
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyCase Western Reserve UniversityClevelandUSA
  3. 3.Tibet Academy of Social SciencesLhasaChina

Personalised recommendations