Abstract
This chapter proposes that a cogent conceptualisation of practice as complexity provides a basis for management education within contemporary hierarchical public sector organisations. It identifies the possibilities, tensions and dilemmas for management educators working with such a framework in public sector organisations in which the logic and practices of neoliberal managerialism prevail. It references senior-middle managers within the South Australian public sector and considers the complexity for management educators of working with such managers. It argues that practice as complexity provides insight into the complex dynamic of management and management education, allowing nuanced understandings of the processes of ‘going on’ by managers in complex organisations and appropriate responses to those processes by management educators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Boundaries for practice and sub-practice are dependent on the frame of reference of the analysis.
- 2.
German for ‘being/existence’ and Heidegger’s term for the essence, the ‘Being’ of human existence.
- 3.
In Australia, VET policies, for example, demand that students receive information in writing about the competencies, the assessment tasks and performance indicators for any program, prior to commencement. Most Australian universities have policies and practices with a similar goal.
- 4.
Referencing Aristotle, Carr (2005: 340) defines praxis as ‘morally informed action, in and through which ethical goods are realised’ and phronesis as ‘practical reasoning based on wise and prudent judgment’.
References
Antonacopoulou, E. (2008). On the practise of practice: In-tensions and ex-tensions in the ongoing reconfiguration of practices. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 112–130). Los Angeles/London: Sage.
Antonacopoulou, E., & Chiva, R. (2007). The social complexity of organizational learning: The dynamics of learning and organizing. Management Learning, 38(3), 277–295.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1990). Art and answerability. In M. Holquist & V. Liapunov (Eds.), Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays (pp. 1–3). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Barnes, B. (2001). Practice as collective action. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Biesta, G. (2010). Five theses on complexity reduction and its politics. In D. Osberg & G. Biesta (Eds.), Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 5–13). Rotterdam: Sense.
Billett, S., Barker, M., & Hernon-Tinning, B. (2004). Participatory practices at work. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(2), 233–258.
Blackman, T. (2001). Complexity theory and the new public management. Social Issues, 1(2) http://www.whb.co.uk/socialissues/tb.htm. Last accessed 1 June 2012.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). The habitus and the space of lifestyles. In Distinction: A social critique of the judgements of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Carr, W. (2005). The role of theory in the professional development of an educational theorist. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 13(3), 333–345.
Carroll, B., Levy, L., & Richmond, D. (2008). Leadership as practice: Challenging the competency paradigm. Leadership, 4(4), 363–379.
Clegg, S. R., & Ross-Smith, A. (2003). Revising the boundaries: Management education and learning in a postpositivist world. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(1), 85–98.
Cooper, R. (2005). Peripheral vision: Relationality. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1689–1710.
Davis, C. C. (2010a). Practice as complexity: A critical-collagic perspective on management education in the South Australian Public Sector. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Adelaide: School of Education, University of South Australia.
Davis, C. C. (2010b, December). Proceduralising (complex) practice. In Proceedings of the Australian Association of Research in Education (AARE) conference making a difference. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Deem, R., & Brehony, K. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.
Doyle, R. (2009). Doing, describing and documenting: Inscription and practice in social work. Unpublished doctoral thesis. St Andrews: School of Management, University of St Andrews.
Dreyfus, H. (2000). Could anything be more intelligible than everyday intelligibility?: Reinterpreting Division I of Being and Time in the light of Division II. In J. E. Faulconer & M. A. Wrathall (Eds.), Appropriating Heidegger (pp. 155–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elert, G. (n.d.). The chaos hypertextbook. Updated June 1, 2008, viewed August 4, 2008. http://hypertextbook.com/chaos/21.shtml
Fenwick, T. (2006). Tidying the territory: Questioning terms and purposes in work-learning research. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(5), 265–278.
Fenwick, T. (2008). Workplace learning: Emerging trends and new perspectives. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 119(Fall), 17–26.
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France 1978–1979. Basinstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
Fournier, V., & Grey, C. (2000). At the critical moment: Conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations, 53(1), 7–32.
Garrick, J. (1999). The dominant discourses of learning at work. In D. Boud & J. Garrick (Eds.), Understanding learning at work (pp. 216–230). London/New York: Routledge.
Gherardi, S. (2009). Introduction: The critical power of the practice ‘lens’. Management Learning, 40(2), 115–128.
Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1(1), 49–72.
Green, B. (2009). The primacy of practice and the problem of representation. In B. Green (Ed.), Understanding and researching professional practice (pp. 39–54). Rotterdam: Sense.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. London: SCM Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York/Toronto: Harper Colophon Books.
Hodkinson, P. (2008). Improving workplace learning: Learning cultures the key. Sydney: TAFE NSW, 2009. http://www.icvet.tafensw.edu.au/focus/workplace_learning.htm
Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–560.
Johnsson, M. C., & Boud, D. (2010). Towards an emergent view of learning work. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29(3), 359–372.
McCall, M. W., Lombardo, M. M., & Morrison, A. M. (1988). The lessons of experience: How successful executives develop on the job. New York: The Free Press.
Okrent, M. (2000). Intentionality, teleology, and normativity. In J. E. Faulconer & M. A. Wrathall (Eds.), Appropriating Heidegger (pp. 191–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olssen, M. (2006). Understanding the mechanisms of neoliberal control: Lifelong learning, flexibility and knowledge capitalism. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 25(3), 213–230.
Petzinger, T. (1999). Complexity – More than a fad? In M. Lissack & H. P. Gunz (Eds.), Managing complexity in organizations: A view in many directions (pp. 29–34). Westport: Quorum.
Pollock, G. (2006). Counter the concentrationary imaginary: Aesthetics as resistance. Unpublished conference: Discourse, power, resistance IV. Manchester: Manchester Metropolitan University.
Power, M. (1994). The audit explosion. London: Demos. Viewed March 14, 2008. http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/auditexplosion
Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Prigogine, I. (n.d.). Interviews on YouTube. YouTube. Viewed January 12, 2009. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2NCdpMlYJxQ
Reay, D. (2004). It’s all becoming a habitus: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444.
Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development of culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2001). National, international and transnational construction of new public management. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), New public management: The transformation of ideas and practice (pp. 43–72). Aldershot: Ashgate.
SASP. (2007). South Australia’s state plan. Adelaide: The Government of South Australia. Viewed February 1, 2010. http://saplan.org.au/content/view/127/159/
Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices. A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Strathern, M. (2000a). Introduction. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy (pp. 1–18). London: Routledge.
Strathern, M. (2000b). The tyranny of transparency. British Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 309–321.
Strathern, M. (2008). Unintended consequences: Interview with Marilyn Strathern. Blog. Viewed February 2, 2010. http://ipnosis.postle.net/pages/UN-CONStrathern.htm
Tronto, J. (1987, Summer). Beyond gender difference to a theory of care. Signs, 12(4), 644–663.
Tronto, J. (1999). Care ethics: Moving forward. Hypatia, 14(1).
Vickers, M. H. (2001). New managerialism and Australian police organizations: A cautionary research note. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 14(1), 7–26.
Wertsch, J., Del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westacott, J. (2009). The future of government: Introduction. Adelaide: The Government of South Australia – PSPC. Viewed September 25, 2009. http://www.pspc.sa.gov.au/index.php/challenging-the-public-sector/67-launch-of-the-pspc-partnership-with-anzsog-challenging-the-public-sector
Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell. (Reprint of English text with index ed.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, C. (2012). Practice as Complexity: Encounters with Management Education in the Public Sector. In: Hager, P., Lee, A., Reich, A. (eds) Practice, Learning and Change. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4774-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4773-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4774-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)