Advertisement

Theories of Practice and Their Connections with Learning: A Continuum of More and Less Inclusive Accounts

  • Paul Hager
Chapter
Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL, volume 8)

Abstract

The term ‘practice’ has been used increasingly in the social and behavioural sciences literatures. Yet, it is also apparent that there is often wide diversity both in the meaning and scope of the ways in which this term is deployed. This chapter discusses and analyses this situation in terms of a continuum ranging from ‘more inclusive’ to ‘less inclusive’ accounts of practice. The more inclusive accounts apply the term practice liberally to human actions of many kinds, whereas the less inclusive accounts restrict the term to human activities that meet very specific and complex criteria. This chapter examines the different assumptions that underpin more inclusive and less inclusive accounts, as well as the kinds of activities that they number amongst practices. The chapter concludes by considering the implications of these different accounts of practice for our understanding of what is involved in the learning of a practice.

Keywords

Professional Practice Standard Operating Procedure Constitutive Rule Internal Good External Good 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2008). On the practise of practice: In-tensions and ex-tensions in the ongoing reconfiguration of practices. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 112–131). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M. (1998). Realism and morphogenesis. In R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (2nd ed.). Lanham/Boulder/New York/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Dreyfus, H. (2001). On the Internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1991). Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect (pp. 73–86). London/Toronto/Sydney/Tokyo/Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Green, B. (Ed.). (2009). Understanding and researching professional practice. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Hager, P. (2005). Philosophical accounts of learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 37(5), 649–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hager, P. (2011). Refurbishing MacIntyre’s account of practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(3), 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hager, P., & Halliday, J. (2006). Recovering informal learning: Wisdom, judgement and community. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Higgins, C. (2003). MacIntyre’s moral theory and the possibility of an aretaic ethics of teaching. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(2), 279–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Higgins, C. (2010). The good life of teaching: An ethics of professional practice. Oxford/Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Kemmis, S. (2005). Knowing practice: Searching for saliences. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 13(3), 391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kemmis, S. (2008). What is professional practice? In C. Kanes (Ed.), Developing professional practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  22. MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three rival versions of moral enquiry. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  23. MacIntyre, A. C. (1994). A partial response to my critics. In J. Horton & S. Mendus (Eds.), After MacIntyre: Critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre (pp. 283–304). Cambridge/Oxford: Polity Press, in association with Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  25. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2004). Practice and the human sciences: The case for a judgement-based practice of care. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  26. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27, 1863–1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. Taylor, C. (1995). To follow a rule. In C. Taylor (Ed.), Philosophical arguments (pp. 165–180). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (2007). Lifelong learning – Signs, discourses, practices. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Winch, C. (2010). Dimensions of expertise: A conceptual exploration of vocational knowledge. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts & Social SciencesUniversity of Technology, SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations