Advertisement

Learning to Practise, Practising to Learn: Doctors’ Transitions to New Levels of Responsibility

  • Miriam Zukas
  • Sue Kilminster
Chapter
Part of the Professional and Practice-based Learning book series (PPBL, volume 8)

Abstract

This chapter draws on a collective case study of doctors’ learning in transition to show that different ways of explaining learning in practice (e.g. situated learning and learning cultures) cannot fully account for what happens when doctors make these transitions. We develop Hodkinson, Biesta and James’ (Vocations and Learning 1:27–47, 2008) theories of learning cultures and cultural theories of learning in two ways to help us understand learning in transition. First, we draw on Thévenot’s (Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In Schatzki TR, Knorr Cetina K, von Savigny E (eds) The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge, London, 2001) notion of pragmatic regimes of practice to show how most approaches to doctors’ learning focus on the public regimes of justification and regular action; transitions, however, always involve regimes of familiarity which are usually ignored in theorising their learning. Second, we introduce our notion of doctors’ transitions as critically intensive learning periods, in order to explain the interrelationships between learning, practice and regimes of familiarity. We ground our discussion in three scenarios to illustrate how practice always involves the socio-material world. We examine the theoretical and practical implications, particularly in respect of learning local practices or, as Thévenot would say, learning regimes of familiarity.

Keywords

Local Practice Cultural Theory Regular Action Learning Culture Public Regime 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bleakley, A. (2005). Stories as data, data as stories: Making sense of narrative inquiry in clinical education. Medical Education, 39(5), 534–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cave, J., Woolf, K., Jones, A., & Dacre, J. (2009). Easing the transition from student to doctor: How can medical schools prepare their graduates for starting work? Medical Teacher, 31(5), 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dornan, T., Scherpbier, A., King, N., & Boshuizen, H. (2005). Clinical teachers and problem-based learning: A phenomenological study. Medical Education, 39(2), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, R. (2009). Life as a learning context? In R. Edwards, G. Biesta, & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Communities, activities and networks. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Illing, J., Morrow, G., Kergon, C., Burford, B., Peile, E., Davies, C., Baldauf, B., Allen, M., Johnson, N., Morrison, J., Donaldson, M., Whitelaw, M., & Field, M. (2008). How prepared are medical graduates to begin practice? A comparison of three diverse UK medical schools: Final summary and conclusions for the GMC Education Committee. London: General Medical Council.Google Scholar
  9. Kilminster, S., Zukas, M., Quinton, N., & Roberts, T. (2010). Learning practice? Exploring the links between transitions and medical performance. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 24(6), 556–570.Google Scholar
  10. Knorr Cetina, K. (2001). Objectual practice. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. Von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lempp, H., Cochrane, M., Seabrook, M., & Rees, J. (2004). Impact of educational preparation on medical students in transition from final year to PRHO year: A qualitative evaluation of final-year training following the introduction of a new year 5 curriculum in a London Medical School. Medical Teacher, 26(3), 276–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lempp, H., Seabrook, M., Cochrane, M., & Rees, J. (2005). The transition from medical student to doctor: Perceptions of final year students and preregistration house officers related to expected learning outcomes. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 59(3), 324–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matheson, C., & Matheson, D. (2009). How well prepared are medical students for their first year as doctors? The views of consultants and specialist registrars in two teaching hospitals. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 85, 582–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mason, L. (2007). Introduction: Bridging the cognitive and sociocultural approaches in research on conceptual change. Is it feasible? Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nikendei, C. B., Kraus, B., Schrauth, M., Briem, S., & Junger, J. (2008). Ward rounds: How prepared are future doctors? Medical Teacher, 30(1), 88–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saljö, R. (2003). From transfer to boundary-crossing. In T. Tuomi-Gröhn & Y. Engeström (Eds.), Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  19. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.Google Scholar
  20. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Thévenot, L. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Unwin, L., Fuller, A., Felstead, A., & Jewson, N. (2009). Worlds within worlds: The relational dance between context and learning in the workplace. In R. Edwards, G. Biesta, & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching: Communities, activities and networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social Science, History and Philosophy BirkbeckUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Leeds Institute of Medical EducationUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations