Advertisement

Reinventing the Identity and Agenda: Descartes, Physico-Mathematical Philosopher of Nature 1629–1633

  • John SchusterEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 27)

Abstract

This Chapter deals with Descartes’ struggle to redefine his projects and vocation, given the collapse of the Regulaein 1628. At this point he set out to become something we have not seen him intending to become at any previous moment, the author of a systematic, pro-Copernican and corpuscular-mechanical philosophy of nature, embodied first in Le Monde. We examine the events, episodes and tendencies which, some scholars have said, caused his move to systematic mechanism. In accord with the historiographical principles guiding this study, we eschew explanations by way of ruptures of agenda and identity, as well as explanations which assign sufficient causality to singular events and episodes. Taking a structured approach, we superimpose consideration of particular developments and events upon examination of fundamental intellectual commitments and agendas. This produces a dense description and explanation of what was a ‘process of inflection’ of Descartes’ projects, rather than a ‘crisis and break’. The Chapter also includes a detailed reconstruction of the course of writing Le Monde,1629–1633.

Keywords

Natural Philosophize Dynamical Principle United Province Spectral Color Eternal Truth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

Works of Descartes and Their Abbreviations

  1. AT  =  Oeuvres de Descartes(revised edition, 12 vols.), edited by C. Adam and P. Tannery (Paris, 1964–76). References are by volume number (in roman) and page number (in Arabic).Google Scholar
  2. SG  =  The World and Other Writings, edited and translated by Stephen Gaukroger (Cambridge,1998).Google Scholar
  3. MM  =  René Descartes, The Principles of Philosophy, translated by V. R. Miller and R. P. Miller (Dordrecht, 1991).Google Scholar
  4. MSM  =  Rene Descartes, Le Monde, ou Traité de la lumière, translated by Michael S. Mahoney (New York, 1979).Google Scholar
  5. CSM(K)  =  The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 3 vols., translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, and (for vol. 3) Anthony Kenny (Cambridge, 1988), References are by volume number (in roman) and page number (in arabic).Google Scholar
  6. HR  =  The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol I translated by E.S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Cambridge, 1968 [1st ed. 1911]).Google Scholar

Other

  1. Alquié, F. (ed.). 1963. Oeuvres philosophiques de Descartes, vol. 1. Paris: Garnier Frères.Google Scholar
  2. Baillet, Adrian. 1691. Vie de Monsieur Descartes. Paris: Paris Daniel Horthemels.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, Barry. 1982. T.S. Kuhn and social science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Beeckman, I. 1939–1953 Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634. 4 vols, ed. C. de Waard. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  5. Biro, Jacqueline. 2009. On earth as in heaven: Cosmography and the shape of the earth from Copernicus to Descartes. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchet, L. 1920. Les antécédents historiques du ‘Je pense, donc je suis’. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, Desmond. 2006. Descartes, a biography. Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, James. 1971. Descartes’ philosophy of nature. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, Harry. 1985. Changing order. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Garber, Daniel. 2000. A different Descartes: Descartes and the programme for a mathematical physics in his correspondence. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. S. Gaukroger, J.A. Schuster, and J. Sutton, 113–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Gaukroger, S. 1995. Descartes: An intellectual biography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Geuroult, Martial. 1954. Métaphysique et Physique de la force chez Descartes et chez Malebranche. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale59: 1–37.Google Scholar
  13. Geuroult, Martial. 1980. The metaphysics and physics of force in Descartes. In Descartes: Philosophy, mathematics and physics, ed. S. Gaukroger, 196–229. Sussex: Harvester.Google Scholar
  14. Gilson, E. 1913. La liberté chez Descartes et la théologie. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  15. Gouhier, H. 1924. La pensée religieuse de Descartes. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  16. Grayling, A.C. 2005. Descartes: The life of René Descartes and its place in his times. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, Peter. 2002a. Voluntarism and early modern science. History of Science40: 63–89.Google Scholar
  18. Harrison, Peter. 2002b. Original sin and the problem of knowledge in early modern Europe. Journal of the History of Ideas63: 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henry, John. 2004. Metaphysics and the origins of modern science: Descartes and the importance of laws of nature. Early Science and Medicine9: 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kenny, Anthony. Trans. and ed. 1970. Descartes, philosophical letters. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Langford, Jerome J. 1971. Galileo, science and the church. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  22. Machamer, Peter, and J.E. McGuire. 2009. Descartes’ changing mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Maclean, I. Trans. and ed. 2006. René Descartes: A discourse on method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. McGuire, J.E. 1972. Boyle’s conception of nature. Journal of the History of Ideas33: 534–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mersenne, M. 1932–1988. Correspondence du P. Marin Mersenne. 17 vols, ed. C. de Waard, R. Pintard, B. Rochot and A. Baelieu. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
  26. Oakley, Francis. 1961. Christian theology and the Newtonian science: The rise of the concept of the laws of nature. Church History30: 433–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Osler, M. 1994. Divine will and the mechanical philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pinch, Trevor. 1985. Towards an analysis of scientific observation: The externality and evidential significance of observational reports in physics. Social Studies of Science15: 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Popkin, Richard. 1964. The history of scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  30. Ribe, Neal. 1997. Cartesian optics and the mastery of nature. Isis88: 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rossi, Paolo. 1970. Philosophy, technology and the arts in the early modern era. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  32. Schuster, J.A. 1977. Descartes and the scientific revolution 1618–34: An interpretation.2 vols. unpublished PhD dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  33. Schuster, J.A. 1990. The scientific revolution. In The companion to the history of modern science, ed. R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie, and M.J.S. Hodge, 217–242. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Schuster, John. 1995. Descartes Agonistes:New tales of Cartesian mechanism. Perspectives on Science3: 99–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schuster, J.A. 2000. Descartes Opticien: The construction of the law of refraction and the manufacture of its physical rationales, 1618–29. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. S. Gaukroger, J.A. Schuster, and J. Sutton, 258–312. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Schuster, John. 2002. L’Aristotelismo e le sue Alternative. In La Rivoluzione Scientifica, ed. D. Garber, 337–357. Rome: Instituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
  37. Schuster, J.A. 2009. Descartes—Philosopher of the scientific revolution; Or natural philosopher in the scientific revolution. Journal of Historical Biography5: 48–83.Google Scholar
  38. Schuster, J.A., and Graeme Watchirs. 1990. Natural philosophy, experiment and discourse: Beyond the Kuhn/Bachelard problematic. In Experimental inquiries: Historical, philosophical and social studies of experimentation in science, ed. H.E. Le Grande, 1–47. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  39. Schutz, Alfred, and Thomas Luckmann. 1974. The structures of the life-world. Trans. R. M. Zaner and H. T. Engelhardt. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  40. Shapin, Steven. 1992. Discipline and Bounding: The History and Sociology of Science As Seen Through the Externalism-Internalism Debate. History of Science30: 333–369.Google Scholar
  41. Shea, W. 1991. The magic of motion and numbers: The scientific career of René Descartes. Canton: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, Norman Kemp. 1952. New studies in the philosophy of Descartes. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Tannery, Paul. 1896. Descartes physician. Révue de Métaphysique et de la Morale4: 478–488.Google Scholar
  44. van Berkel, Klaas. 2000. Descartes’ debt to Beeckman. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. S. Gaukroger, J.A. Schuster, and J. Sutton, 46–59. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Vrooman, J.R. 1970. Rene Descartes, a biography. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
  46. Weber, Max. 1949. The methodology of the social sciences.Trans. Edward Shils and Henry Finch. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Campion CollegeSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Unit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations