Advertisement

Introduction: Problems of Descartes and the Scientific Revolution

  • John SchusterEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in History and Philosophy of Science book series (AUST, volume 27)

Abstract

This chapter defines the scope of the work and some of the obstacles to accomplishing it: This volume reconstructs key aspects of the early career of Descartes from 1618 to 1633; that is, up through the point of his composing his first system of natural philosophy, Le Monde, 1629–1633. The overlapping and intertwined development of Descartes’ projects in physico-mathematics, analytical mathematics, universal method, and, finally, systematic corpuscular-mechanical natural philosophy, are the main topics. However, the conceptual and technical content of these projects is always examined in the contexts of Descartes’ agendas for them, and his construction and presentation of his intellectual identity in relation to them. The problems Descartes has posed to historians of science are canvassed, in particular, difficulties arising from his claims about his method, and from scholars’ failure properly to understand the field of natural philosophy in which he worked. The nature of scientific biography is also discussed, along with its relation to wider forms of historical analysis. The Chapter ends with a summary of the content of each of the following 12 chapters.

Keywords

Early Career Scientific Revolution Universal Method Natural Philosophize Virtual Peer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

Works of Descartes and Their Abbreviations

  1. AT  =  Oeuvres de Descartes (revised edition, 12 vols.), edited by C. Adam and P. Tannery (Paris, 1964–76). References are by volume number (in roman) and page number (in Arabic).Google Scholar
  2. SG  =  The World and Other Writings, edited and translated by Stephen Gaukroger (Cambridge,1998).Google Scholar
  3. MM  =  René Descartes, The Principles of Philosophy, translated by V. R. Miller and R. P. Miller (Dordrecht, 1991).Google Scholar
  4. MSM  =  Rene Descartes, Le Monde, ou Traité de la lumière, translated by Michael S. Mahoney (New York, 1979).Google Scholar
  5. CSM(K)  =  The Philosophical Writings Of Descartes, 3 vols., translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch, and (for vol. 3) Anthony Kenny, (Cambridge, 1988) References are by volume number (in roman) and page number (in Arabic).Google Scholar
  6. HR  =  The Philosophical Works of Descartes, vol I translated by E.S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross (Cambridge, 1968 [1st ed. 1911]).Google Scholar

Other

  1. Aiton, E.J. 1972. The vortex theory of planetary motion. New York: Neale Watson Academic Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard, G. 1965, 1st ed. 1938. La formation de l’esprit scientifique, 4th ed. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, Barry. 1982. T.S.Kuhn and social science. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Boutroux, P. 1900. L’imagination et les mathématiques selon Descartes. Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar
  5. Brunschvicg, L. 1927. Mathématique et métaphysique chez Descartes. Révue de Métaphysique et de Morale 34: 277–324.Google Scholar
  6. Dreyfus-Le Foyer, H. 1937. Les conceptions Medicale de Descartes. Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale 44: 237–283.Google Scholar
  7. Dunn, John. 1968. The identity of the history of ideas. Philosophy 43: 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans, Richard. 1999. In defense of history. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Gabbey, Alan. 1971 (1980). Force and inertia in the seventeenth century: Descartes and Newton. In Descartes: Philosophy, mathematics and physics, ed. S. Gaukroger, 230–320. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  10. Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes’ metaphysical physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gaukroger, Stephen (ed.). 1980. Descartes: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gaukroger, Stephen. 1995. Descartes: An intellectual biography. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  13. Gaukroger, S., and J.A. Schuster. 2002. The hydrostatic paradox and the origins of Cartesian dynamics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33: 535–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaukroger, S.W., J.A. Schuster, and J. Sutton (eds.). 2000. Descartes’ natural philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Grayling, A.C. 2005. Descartes: The life of René Descartes and its place in his times. London: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Howard, Don. 2008. Time for a moratorium? Isaacson, Einstein and the challenge of scientific biography. Journal of Historical Biography 3: 124–133.Google Scholar
  17. Klein, Jacob. 1968. Greek mathematical thought and the origin of algebra. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Koyré, A. 1939, Eng. Trans. 1978. Etudes Galiléennes. Paris: Hermann & Cie. English trans. Galileo Studies. Trans. J. Mepham. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester.Google Scholar
  19. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1953. Review of The Scientific Work of René Descartes by J.F. Scott and of Descartes and the Modern Mind by A.G.A.Balz. Isis 44: 285–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1955. Review of New studies in the philosophy of Descartes by Norman Kemp Smith and Descartes’ philosophical writings, ed. N.K Smith, and of The method of Descartes, by L.J. Beck, Isis 46: 377–380.Google Scholar
  21. Latour, Bruno. 1986. Visualisation and cognition; thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present 6: 1–40.Google Scholar
  22. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, Bruno. 1988. The Prince for machines as well as for machinations. In Technology and social process, ed. B. Elliott. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Milhaud, Gaston. 1921. Descartes savant. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  25. Popkin, Richard. 1964. The history of scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
  26. Richards, E., and J.A. Schuster. 1989. The myth of feminine method: A challenge for gender studies and the social studies of science. Social Studies of Science 19: 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sabra, A.I. 1967. Theories of light from Descartes to Newton. London: Oldbourne.Google Scholar
  28. Schuster, John. 1979. Kuhn and Lakatos revisited. British Journal for the History of Science 12: 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schuster, J.A. 1980. Descartes’ Mathesis Universalis: 1619–28. In Descartes: Philosophy, mathematics and physics, ed. S. Gaukroger, 41–96. Sussex: Harvester.Google Scholar
  30. Schuster, John. 1984. Methodologies as mythic structures: A preface to the future historiography of method. Metascience: Review of the Australasian Association for the History, Philosophy and Social Studies of Science 1–2: 15–36.Google Scholar
  31. Schuster, J.A. 1986. Cartesian method as mythic speech: A diachronic and structural analysis. In The politics and rhetoric of scientific method, ed. J.A. Schuster and R.R. Yeo, 33–95. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schuster, J.A. 1990. The scientific revolution. In The companion to the history of modern science, ed. R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie, and M.J.S. Hodge, 217–242. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Schuster, J.A. 1991. ‘Bruno’s [No history required] Tour of the past’, Combined research program in science & technology analysis. Working paper number 1. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, ed. Mark Rix. University of Wollongong, Wollongong. Available through the National Library of Australia and on my web site: http://descartes-agonistes.com/
  34. Schuster, J.A. 1993. Whatever should we do with Cartesian method: Reclaiming Descartes for the history of science. In Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes, ed. S. Voss, 195–223. Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schuster, John. 1995. Descartes Agonistes: New tales of Cartesian mechanism. Perspectives on Science 3: 99–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schuster, J.A. 2000. Descartes Opticien: The construction of the law of refraction and the manufacture of its physical rationales, 1618–29. In Descartes’ natural philosophy, ed. S. Gaukroger, J.A. Schuster, and J. Sutton, 258–312. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Schuster, J.A. 2002. ‘L’Aristotelismo e le sue Alternative’. In La Rivoluzione Scientifica, ed. D. Garber, 337–357. Rome: Instituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.Google Scholar
  38. Schuster, J.A. 2005. “Waterworld”: Descartes’ vortical celestial mechanics: A gambit in the natural philosophical contest of the early seventeenth century. In The science of nature in the seventeenth century: Changing patterns of early modern natural philosophy, ed. Peter Anstey and John Schuster, 35–79. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Schuster, J.A. 2009. Descartes—philosopher of the scientific revolution; or natural philosopher in the scientific revolution. Journal of Historical Biography 5: 48–83.Google Scholar
  40. Schuster, J.A., and Graeme Watchirs. 1990. Natural philosophy, experiment and discourse: Beyond the Kuhn/Bachelard problematic. In Experimental inquiries: Historical, philosophical and social studies of experimentation in science, ed. H.E. Le Grande, 1–47. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  41. Schuster, J.A., and Richard R. Yeo. 1986. Introduction. In The politics and rhetoric of scientific method, ed. J.A. Schuster and R.R. Yeo, ix–xxxvii. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schuster, John, and Alan B.H. Taylor. 1996. Seized by the spirit of modern science. Metascience 9: 9–26.Google Scholar
  43. Schutz, Alfred. 1970. Reflections on the problem of relevance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Schutz, Alfred, and Thomas Luckmann. 1973. The structures of the life-world. Trans. R.M. Zaner and H.T. Engelhardt. London: HeinemannGoogle Scholar
  45. Scott, J.F. 1952. The scientific work of René Descartes, 1596–1650. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  46. Shapin, Steven. 1992. Discipline and bounding: The history and sociology of science as seen through the externalism-internalism debate. History of Science 30: 333–369.Google Scholar
  47. Shea, W. 1991. The magic of motion and numbers: The scientific career of René Descartes. Canton: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
  48. Skinner, Quentin. 1969. Meaning and understanding in the history of ideas. History and Theory 8: 3–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smith, Norman Kemp. 1952. New studies in the philosophy of Descartes. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Voss, Stephen (ed.). 1993. Essays on the philosophy and science of René Descartes. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Campion CollegeSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Unit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations