Skip to main content

Cooperation in the Arctic Region: Legal Aspects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean

Abstract

Why is it worth discussing the subject of international law and cooperation in the Arctic? Or to put it more bluntly: Do states and organisations have a duty to cooperate in Arctic affairs? And can a state or an organisation claim a right to be involved in Arctic cooperation? Do the Arctic states have any special responsibility? With respect to the first question – why it is worth discussing the subject of international law and cooperation in the Arctic – there are several major reasons why this is so, and they relate to: (a) the need for cooperation in the Arctic; (b) the manner in which cooperation takes place in the Arctic; (c) the development of the international law of cooperation; and (d) the link between the obligation to cooperate and responsibility.

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the view of the Swedish Ministry for Foreign Affairs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See e.g. the statement by L. Dolliver Nelson, President of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, on the Commemoration of the 20th Anniversary of the opening for signature of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea at the plenary of the 57th session of the United Nations General Assembly on 9 December 2002.

  2. 2.

    Article 66, para. 4.

  3. 3.

    Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (New Zealand v. Japan; Australia v. Japan), Order of 27 August 1999, Para. 48.

  4. 4.

    The Government of Canada and the United States have announced that they would take steps to endorse and review their positions regarding the Declaration. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/declaration.html. The importance of the Declaration was further emphasised by the Durban Review Conference, when 182 States from all regions of the world reached consensus on an outcome document in which they welcomed the adoption of the UN Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples and “urge[d] States to take all necessary measures to implement the rights of indigenous peoples in accordance with international human rights instruments”. (Outcome document of the Durban Review Conference, 24 April 2009, para.73). http://www.un.org/durbanreview2009/pdf/Durban_Review_outcome_document_En.pdf

Literature Cited

  1. Arctic Council (2009) Tromsø Declaration on the occasion of the sixth ministerial meeting of the Arctic council. Tromsø, 29 April 2009. http://eppr.arctic-council.org/content/reports/FINAL_DECLARATION_TROMSO_29APR_09.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  2. CLCS (2011) Submissions, through the secretary-general of the United Nations, to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf, Pursuant to Article 76, Paragraph 8, of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 Dec 1982. http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/commission_submissions.htm. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  3. Durban Review Conference (2009) Outcome document of the Durban review conference. Geneva, 24 April 2009. http://www.un.org/durbanreview2009/pdf/Durban_Review_outcome_document_En.pdf Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  4. Gorbachev M (1987) Speech in Murmansk at the ceremonial meeting on the occasion of the presentation of the order of Lenin and the gold star to the city of Murmansk. 1 Oct 1987. http://www.barentsinfo.fi/docs/Gorbachev_speech.pdf. Accessed 24 Aug 2011

  5. Hanasaari (2010) The Arctic future – Cooperation in the face of change. Conference Programme. Swedish-Finnish Cultural Center, Helsinki. http://www.hanasaari.fi/en/cultural-center/events-calendar/events-archive/60-samhallsdebatt/661-seminarium-om-de-arktiska-regionernas-samarbete. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  6. ILC (2006) Draft principles on the allocation of loss in the case of transboundary harm arising out of hazardous activities, with commentaries. United Nations International Law Commission. http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_10_2006.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  7. ITLOS (2001) The MOX plant case (Ireland v. United Kingdom), No.10. Request for provisional measures. Order. 3 Dec 2001. http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_10/Order.03.12.01.E.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  8. Northern Forum (1991) About the northern forum. http://www.northernforum.org/servlet/content/about_the_northern_forum.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  9. Ottawa Declaration (1996) Para1(a) Declaration on the establishment of the Arctic Council. Ottawa, 19 Sept 1996. http://www.international.gc.ca/polar-polaire/ottdec-decott.aspx?view=d. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  10. Polar Bear Agreement (1973) Agreement on the conservation of polar bears. Oslo, 15 Sept 1973. http://www.ecolex.org/server2.php/libcat/docs/TRE/Multilateral/En/TRE000041.txt. Accessed 24 Aug 2011

  11. Rio Declaration(1992) Rio Declaration on environment and development. Rio de Janeiro, 14 June 1992. http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=78&articleid=1163. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  12. Stockholm Declaration (1972) Declaration of the United Nations conference on the human environment. Stockholm, 16 June 1972. http://www.polcak.com/res/environment%20protection/stockholm%20declaration.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  13. UNCLOS (1982) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Montego Bay, 10 Dec 1982.    http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  14. United Nations (1945) Charter of the United Nations. San Francisco, 26 June 1945. http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/. Accessed 24 Aug 2011

  15. United Nations (1970) Declaration on principles of international law, friendly relations and co-operation among states in accordance with the charter of the United Nations. General Assembly, Res.2625 (XXV). 24 Oct 1970. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/NR0/348/90/IMG/NR034890.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 24 Aug 2011

  16. United Nations (2007) United Nations Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. General Assembly, A/Res/61/295. 2 Oct 2007. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N06/512/07/PDF/N0651207.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Jacobsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jacobsson, M. (2013). Cooperation in the Arctic Region: Legal Aspects. In: Berkman, P., Vylegzhanin, A. (eds) Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4713-5_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics