Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Political Stability and Multi-level Governance in the Arctic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean

Abstract

This chapter examines the interplay between regional institutions for governing the Arctic and broader institutions applicable there and elsewhere. Despite rapid environmental change in the Arctic, political stability remains high. One reason is that Arctic states have relatively few unsettled maritime boundary issues and manage the remaining ones in a cooperative manner. Another reason is that an international legal framework exists for governing economic use of the region. The framework is based on global, customary international law codified in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS, http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm.) and obliges states to respond individually and jointly to the new challenges deriving from increasing economic activities. The chapter then examines the adequacy of regional means for strengthening the Arctic governance system, and finds that regional institutions like the Arctic Council have only partial roles to play – the Arctic Ocean needs multilevel governance. The fact that Arctic environmental challenges cannot be addressed without significant contributions from broader or global institutions raises the question of how the Arctic Council should deal with certain non-Arctic states wishing to participate in Council work. Important governance functions like generating knowledge on environmental risks and response options, obtaining Arctic-sensitive regulations in broader international fora, and mobilizing resources and legal competence to support rule implementation stand to benefit from greater involvement of other interested states. Providing effective and legitimate governance is the best basis for ensuring political stability in the Arctic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. ACAP (2008) Minutes from a meeting in Moscow, 5 Mar 2008. Moscow, the Arctic Contaminants Action Program. http://www.ac-acap.org/files/agenda/ACAP-WG_04.-05.03.8_Draft_Minutes.doc. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  2. ACAP (2009) Progress report to senior Arctic officials, 13 Nov 2009. Copenhagen, Arctic Contaminants Action Program. http://www.ac-acap.org/files/Other/12-13.11.09.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  3. ACIA (2005) Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. ACIA scientific report. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://www.acia.uaf.edu/pages/scientific.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  4. AMAP (1997) Arctic pollution issues: a state of the Arctic environmental report. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo. http://www.amap.no/documents/index.cfm?dirsub=/Arctic%20Pollution%20Issues%20-%20A%20State%20of%20the%20Arctic%20Environment%20Report. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  5. AMAP (2002) Arctic pollution 2002: persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals, radioactivity, human health, changing pathways. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo. http://www.amap.no/documents/index.cfm?dirsub=/Arctic%20Pollution%202002. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  6. AMAP (2008) Arctic oil and gas assessment 2007. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme, Oslo. http://www.amap.no/oga/. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  7. AMAP (2010) Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the Arctic. Sci Total Environ Spec Issue 408:2851–3051. Elsevier. http://www.amap.no/documents/index.cfm?dirsub=/AMAP%20Assessment%202009%20-%20POPs%20in%20the%20Arctic. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  8. AMSA (2009) Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment. http://www.pame.is/amsa/amsa-2009-report. Accessed on 20 Aug 2011

  9. Arctic Council (2009a) Arctic offshore oil and gas guidelines. http://arctic-council.org/filearchive/Arctic%20Offhsore%20Oil%20and%20Gas%20Guidelines%202009.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  10. Arctic Council (2009b) Tromsø Declaration on the occasion of the sixth ministerial meeting of the Arctic Council. Tromsø, Norway. http://arctic-council.org/filearchive/Tromsoe%20Declaration-1..pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  11. Arctic Council (2011) Nuuk Declaration on the occasion of the seventh ministerial meeting of the Arctic Council. Nuuk, Greenland. http://www.arctic-council.org/filearchive/Nuuk%20Declaration%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  12. Barents Sea Treaty (2011) Treaty between the Kingdom of Norway and the Russian Federation on delimitation and cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean. http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/UD/Vedlegg/Folkerett/avtale_engelsk.pdf. Accessed on 20 Aug 2011

  13. Borgerson S (2008) Arctic meltdown: the economic and security implications of global warming. Foreign Aff 87:63–77. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/63222/scott-g-borgerson/arctic-meltdown. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  14. Box JE, Cappelen J, Decker D, Fettweis X, Mote T, Tedesco M, van de Wal RSW (2010) Greenland. Arctic report card: update for 2010. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC, pp 55–64. http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/greenland.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brigham LW (2000) The emerging International Polar Navigation Code: bi-polar relevance? In: Vidas D (ed) Protecting the polar marine environment: law and policy for pollution prevention. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 221–243

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brigham LW (2010) The fast-changing maritime Arctic. Proceedings of the US Naval Institute 410:54–59. http://www.americanpolar.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/USNI_Naval_Review_Arctic_May_2010.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  17. Casper KN (2009) Oil and gas development in the Arctic: softening of ice demands hardening of international law. Nat Resour J 49:825–881. http://lawlibrary.unm.edu/nrj/49/3-4/825-882.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  18. Churchill R (2001) Claims to maritime zones in the Arctic: law of the sea normality or polar pecularity. In: Elferink AGO, Rothwell D (eds) The law of the sea and polar maritime delimitation and jurisdiction. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, pp 105–124

    Google Scholar 

  19. CLRTAP (1979) Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. http://sedac.ciesin.org/entri/texts/transboundary.air.pollution.1979.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  20. Deggim H (2009) International requirements for ships operating in polar waters. International Maritime Organization, London

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dewailly E, Furgal C (2003) POPs, the environment, and public health. In: Downie DL, Fenge T (eds) Northern lights against POPs: combating toxic threats in the Arctic. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  22. European Parliament (2008) Resolution on Arctic governance. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&reference=P6-TA-2008-0474&language=EN. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  23. Gorbachev M (1987) Speech in Murmansk at the ceremonial meeting on the occasion of the presentation of the order of Lenin and the gold star to the city of Murmansk, 1 Oct 1987. English translation by the Press Office of the USSR Embassy, Ottawa, 1988. http://www.barentsinfo.fi/docs/Gorbachev_speech.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  24. Greenland-Canada Continental Shelf Agreement (1973) Agreement between the Government of the Kingdom of Denmark and the Government of Canada relating to the delimitation of the continental shelf between Greenland and Canada. http://www.un.org/depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/DNK-CAN1973CS.PDF. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  25. Griffiths F (2009) Towards a Canadian Arctic strategy. Foreign Policy for Canada’s Tomorrow. No. 1. Canadian International Council, Toronto. http://www.geography.ryerson.ca/jmaurer/411_703CanArcticSov.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoel AH (2006) Climate change. In: Stokke OS, Hønneland G (eds) International cooperation and Arctic governance. Regime effectiveness and northern region building. Routledge, London, pp 112–137

    Google Scholar 

  27. IMO (2002) International Maritime Organization. Guidelines for ships operating in Arctic ice-covered waters. MSC/Circ. 1056, MEPC/Circ. 399. 23 Dec 2002. http://www5.imo.org/SharePoint/blastDatArctic%20Oceannly.asp/data_id=6629/1056-MEPC-Circ399.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  28. Jensen Ø (2008) Arctic shipping guidelines: towards a legal regime for navigation safety and environmental protection? Polar Rec 44:107–114. http://www.fni.no/doc%26;pdf/OYJ-PR-2008.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson D (2012) Can competent authorities cooperate for the common good: towards a collective arrangement in the North-East Atlantic (Chap. 29, this volume).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kefferpütz R (2010) On thin ice? (Mis)interpreting Russian policy in the high north. CEPS Policy Brief No. 205

    Google Scholar 

  31. Koivurova T, Molenaar EJ (2010) International governance and the regulation of the marine Arctic. Overview and gap analysis, options for addressing identified gaps and a proposal for a legally binding instrument. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/3in1_final.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  32. Koivurova T, Molenaar E, VanderZwaag D (2009) Canada, the EU, and Arctic Ocean governance: a tangled and shifting seascape and future directions. J Transnatl Law Policy 18(2):247–287. http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/transnational/vol18_2/koivurova.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  33. Norway (2006) The Norwegian government’s high north strategy. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Oslo. http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/UD/Vedlegg/strategien.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  34. Offerdal K (2006) Oil, gas and the Arctic environment. In: Stokke OS, Hønneland G (eds) International cooperation and Arctic governance. Regime effectiveness and northern region building. Routledge, London, pp 138–163

    Google Scholar 

  35. Øseth E (2011) Climate change in the Northern Arctic. Consequences for life in the north. Norwegian Polar Institute, report series No. 136. http://brage.bibsys.no/npolar/bitstream/URN:NBN:no-bibsys_brage_16521/1/Rapport136Eng.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  36. OSPAR Convention (1992) Convention for the protection of the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic. http://www.ospar.org/html_documents/ospar/html/OSPAR_Convention_e_updated_text_2007.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  37. Overland J, Wang M, Walsh J (2011) Arctic report card: update for 2010. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC, pp 8–15. http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/atmosphere.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  38. PAME (2009) Regional programme of action for the protection of the Arctic marine environment from land-based activities. Protection of the Arctic Marine Environmental working group, Akureryi. http://www.pame.is/images/stories/Deliverables_to_SAOsMinisters/PAME_RPA_layout_031109-_leirtt_nv_09.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  39. Perovich D, Meier W, Maslanik J, Richter-Menge J (2010) Sea ice cover. Arctic report card: update for 2010. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC, pp 16–20. http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/seaice.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

  40. Phillips L (2009) Arctic Council rejects EU’s observer application. http://euobserver.com/885/28043. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  41. POPs Convention (2001) Stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants. http://chm.pops.int/Convention/tabid/54/language/en-GB/Default.aspx. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  42. Prescott V, Schofield CH (2005) The maritime political boundaries of the world, 2nd edn. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  43. Russian Federation (2009) The foundations of Russian Federation policy in the Arctic until 2020 and beyond. Issued 18 Sept 2008. Original available at http://www.scrf.gov.ru/documents/99.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011. Translation by Rusnak M and Berman I. J Int Sec Aff 18:97–105. http://www.securityaffairs.org/issues/2010/18/russia%27s_new_arctic_strategy.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  44. Selin H (2000) Towards international chemical safety: taking action on persistent organic pollutants. Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stenlund P (2002) Lessons in regional cooperation from the Arctic. Ocean Coast Manag 45:835–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Stickley CE, St. John K, Koç N, Jordan RW, Passchier S, Pearce RB, Kearns LE (2009) Evidence for middle Eocene Arctic sea ice from diatoms and ice-rafted debris. Nature 460:376–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Stokke OS (2000) Managing straddling stocks: the interplay of global and regional regimes. Ocean Coast Manag 43(2–3):205–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Stokke OS (ed) (2001) Governing high seas fisheries. The interplay of global and regional regimes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  49. Stokke OS (2007) A legal regime for the Arctic? Interplay with the law of the sea convention. Mar Policy 31(4):402–408. http://www.fni.no/doc%26;pdf/oss-mp-2007.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Stokke OS (2009) Trade measures and the combat of IUU Fishing: institutional interplay and effective governance in the Northeast Atlantic. Mar Policy 33(2):339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Stokke OS (2011) Environmental security in the Arctic: the case for multi-level governance. Int J 66:835–848

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stokke OS, Hønneland G, Schei PJ (2006) Pollution and conservation. In: Stokke OS, Hønneland G (eds) International cooperation and Arctic governance: regime effectiveness and northern region building. Routledge, London, pp 78–111

    Google Scholar 

  53. Straddling Stocks Agreement (1995) Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 Dec 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/fish_stocks_agreement/CONF164_37.htm. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  54. UNCLOS (1982) United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  55. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992) http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  56. United Nations Secretary-General (2002) Oceans and the law of the sea. Report to the United Nations General Assembly, A/57/57/Add.1. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N02/629/28/PDF/N0262928.pdf?OpenElement. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  57. United States (2009) Arctic region policy. National security presidential directive 66 and homeland security presidential directive 25. 9 Jan 2009. Washington, DC. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2009/01/20090112-3.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

  58. Walker DA, Bhatt US, Comiso JC, Epstein HE, Gould WA, Henry GHR, Jia GJ, Kokelj SV, Lantz TC, Mercado-Díaz JA, Pinzon JE, Raynolds MK, Shaver GR, Tucker CJ, Tweedie CE, Webber PJ (2010) Vegetation. Arctic report card: update for 2010. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC, pp 55–64. http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/vegetation.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement   

Part of the material in this chapter has previously been reported by the author in somewhat different form in [51] and appears with the kind permission of the Canadian International Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Fridtjof Nansens vei 17, Lysaker, 1366, Norway

    Olav Schram Stokke (Research Professor)

Authors
  1. Olav Schram Stokke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olav Schram Stokke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Head, Arctic Ocean Geopolitics Programme, Cambridge, CB2 1ER, United Kingdom

    Paul Arthur Berkman

  2. , Legal Department, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Street 7, Moscow, 117997, Russia

    Alexander N. Vylegzhanin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stokke, O.S. (2013). Political Stability and Multi-level Governance in the Arctic. In: Berkman, P., Vylegzhanin, A. (eds) Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4713-5_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation