Skip to main content

Variation in Phenological Development of Winter Barley

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2009 Accesses

Abstract

Phenology of small grains as a complex trait that matches plant development with growing conditions is an important factor that influences plant adaptation to a particular environment and final yield of the plant. Scales of growth based on plant phenology and scales of development based on apical morphology are very precise, but relationships between them are not always clear. Some morphogenetic features of cereal growth can be predicted on the basis of leaf appearance, which means that shoot apex development is coordinated with leaf appearance and total number of leaves formed. The objective of this research was to study the relationship between apical development and plant phenology and the variability in phenological development of diverse winter barley cultivars under field conditions. Twelve barley cultivars differing in origin, pedigree, and agronomic traits were used in this study conducted during six growing seasons in the location of Novi Sad (45°20′N, 15°51′E, altitude 86 m) under rainfed conditions. Phyllochron approach was used as a method for determination of initial/final stages of apex development. The duration of the phases was converted to cumulated growing degree days (GDD). Spikelet initiation started at 2.5 Haun stage and finished at 7.1 Haun stage. Preanthesis phases (single ridge – SR, double ridge – DR, spikelet development – SD, heading – H, anthesis – A) and grain filling period (GFP) were under significant effect of genetic (G), environmental (E), and interaction factors (G × E). Of the total variation in the DR phase, 55.7% was due to G × Y, 22.1% due to E, and 12.3% due to G. Spikelet development was mainly under control of G and E, 42% and 44%, respectively. Heritability was 0.57 and 0.95 for DR and SD, respectively. Across cultivars and environments, of the total growing period, 138 GDD belonged to sowing-first leaf period, 161 to SR, 326 to DR, 541 to SD, 254 to flag leaf-H, 142 to H-A, and 732 to GF. Although variability was found in the duration of the preanthesis phases and GF, especially in spikelet and flower development, positive genotypic correlations were found to exist between most of the phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arduini, I., Ercoli, L., Mariotti, M., & Masoni, A. (2010). Coordination between plant and apex development in Hordeum vulgare ssp. distichum. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 333, 454–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arisnabarreta, S., & Miralles, D. J. (2006). Floret development and grain setting in near isogenic two- and six-rowed barley lines (Hordeum vulgare l.). Field Crops Research, 96, 466–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. K., & Gallagher, J. N. (1983). The development of winter wheat in the field. 1. Relationship between apical development and plant morphology within and between seasons. The Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge, 101, 327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., & Wienhues, F. (1965). Comparative studies on the development of the spike in wheat, barley and rye. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung, 54, 130–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borràs, G., Romagosa, I., van Eeuwijk, F., & Slafer, G. A. (2009). Genetic variability in duration of pre-heading phases and relationships with leaf appearance and tillering dynamics in a barley population. Field Crops Research, 113, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borràs-Gelonch, G., Slafer, G. A., Casas, A., van Eeuwijk, F., & Roagosa, I. (2010). Genetic control of pre-heading phase and other traits related to development in a double-haploid barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) population. Field Crops Research, 119, 36–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud, J. M. (1988). A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution, 42, 958–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. A. (2007). Understanding the physiological basis of yield potential in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, 145, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, C., Durand, D. J., Ljutovac, S., Schäufele, R., Gastal, F., Andrieu, B. (2004). A functional-structural model of the elongation of the grass leaf and of its relationship to the phyllochron. In C. Godin (Ed.), Fourth international workshop on functional-structural plant models, Montpellier, France (pp. 98–104).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. S., Hess, W. M., & Trione, E. J. (1985). Development of the young wheat spike: A stem study of Chinese spring wheat. American Journal of Botany, 72(4), 548–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, F. G., Slafer, G. A., & Miralles, D. J. (2001). Vernalization and photoperiod responses in wheat pre-flowering reproductive phases. Field Crops Research, 74, 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haun, J. R. (1973). Visual quantification of wheat development. Agronomy Journal, 65, 116–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jame, Y. W., Cutforth, H. W., & Ritchie, J. T. (1998). Interaction of temperature and daylength on leaf appearance rate in wheat and barley. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 92, 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juskiw, P. E., Jame, Y. W., & Kryzanowski, L. (2001). Phenological development of spring barley in a short-season growing area. Agronomy Journal, 93, 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kernich, G. C., Halloran, G. M., & Flood, R. G. (1997). Variation in duration of pre-anthesis phases of development in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 48(1), 59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, E. J. M. (1990). Co-ordination of leaf emergence and leaf and spikelet primordium initiation in wheat. Field Crops Research, 25, 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, E. J. M. (2002). Botany of the wheat plant. In B. C. Curtis, S. Rajaram, & H. Gómez-Macpherson (Eds.), Bread wheat: improvement and production. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, E. J. M., Appleyard, M., & Fellowes, G. (1985). Effect of sowing date and variety on main shoot leaf emergence and number of leaves of barley and wheat. Agronomie, 5, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, G. S., Wilhelm, W. W., & Morgan, J. A. (1992). Simulating winter wheat shoot apex phenology. Journal of Agricultural Science, 119, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miglietta, F. (1991). Simulation of wheat of ontogenesis. I Appearance of main stem leaves in the field. Climate Research, 1, 145–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miralles, D. J., & Slafer, G. A. (2007). Sink limitations to yield in wheat: How could it be reduced? Journal of Agricultural Science, 145, 139–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, J. E., Trnka, M., Kersebaum, K. C., Skjelvåg, A. O., Seguin, B., Peltonen-Sainio, P., Rossi, F., Kozyra, J., & Micale, F. (2011). Impact and adaptation of European crop production systems to climate change. European Journal of Agronomy, 34, 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pržulj, N., & Momčilović, V. (2011). Importance of spikelet formation phase in the yield biology of winter barley. Field and Vegetable Crops Research, 48, 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. A. (1991). Crop improvement for temperature Australia: Future opportunities. Field Crops Research, 26, 141–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickman, R. W., & Klepper, B. L. (1995). The phyllochron: Where do we go in the future? Crop Science, 34, 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slafer, G. A., & Whitechurch, E. M. (2001). Manipulating wheat development to improve adaptation and to search for alternative opportunities to increase yield potential. In M. P. Reynolds, J. I. Ortiz-Monasterio, & A. McNab (Eds.), Application of physiology in wheat breeding (pp. 160–170). Mexico: CIMMYT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slafer, G. A., Araus, J. L., Royo, C., & García del Moral, L. F. (2005). Promising ecophysiological traits for genetic improvement of cereals yields in Mediterranean environments. Annals of Applied Biology, 46, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitechurch, E. M., Slafer, G. A., & Miralles, D. J. (2007). Variability in the duration of stem elongation in wheat and barley genotypes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 193, 138–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research, 14, 415–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y., Li, W., Wu, W., Chen, Q., Mao, D., & Worland, A. J. (2001). Genetic dissection of heading time and its components in rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 10, 1236–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Novo Pržulj .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Zhejiang University Press and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pržulj, N., Momèiloviæ, V., Perović, D., Nožinić, M. (2013). Variation in Phenological Development of Winter Barley. In: Zhang, G., Li, C., Liu, X. (eds) Advance in Barley Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4682-4_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics