Skip to main content

Abstract

New higher education professionals (HEPROs) are a heterogeneous group satisfying the growing need of university management for systematic knowledge about the university and releasing academic and administrative staff from a variety of tasks. HEPROs are not primarily active in teaching and research but prepare and support decisions of university management, establish services and actively shape the three missions of research, teaching and transfer of knowledge and technology. Reviewing the literature of the past two decades—mainly from Australia, Germany, Great Britain, Norway and the United States—two trails of research are identified: first, a quantitative research trail grasping the bureaucratisation of universities and growing numbers of personnel and, second, a qualitative research trail, shedding light on the differentiation of university personnel in a shifting working environment. The analysis is concluded by suggesting an Overlap Model, situating HEPROs on a continuum of roles between the two poles of academic and administrative personnel. The Overlap Model provides a simple clear-cut picture of the three spheres and the overlaps of functions and tasks of academic and administrative personnel and HEPROs; it makes the evolution of categories of university personnel explicit and aligns the functions, tasks and roles in the Academic and Administrative Overlap for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The German sociologist Stichweh (2008) refers to the Bologna Process as the social form of mass higher education.

  2. 2.

    The Dearing Report mentions “higher education personnel professionals” (Dearing 1997, para. 14.15).

  3. 3.

    Not including costs for administration of libraries, student services, research, and physical plant.

  4. 4.

    Including institutional support, student services, and academic support; but excluding libraries.

  5. 5.

    This respective increase took place in private colleges, as well.

  6. 6.

    The study included universities of different size, from different parts of Germany, some were research-intensive universities, some more teaching oriented, some technical universities.

  7. 7.

    For Norway, Gornitzka et al. (1998, pp. 38–39) see the aspect of professional ethics connected with the capacity of administration to react to environmental change.

  8. 8.

    Another wage scheme exists for professors in Germany (Detmer and Preissler 2004, 2006; Pritchard 2006, pp. 106–109).

  9. 9.

    In Germany, non-academic staff, normally referred to as technical-administrative staff, is like academic staff, part of the public service. This does not mean that all staff is employed as civil servants.

  10. 10.

    Conway had a long career in the management of different higher education institutions and was the President of the Association of Tertiary Education Management (ATEM) from 2001 to 2003 (Conway 2007, pp. VI, 32).

  11. 11.

    Another account of the difficulty of finding a suitable terminology with reference to the aims of professional associations is the report on professional managers in higher education in Great Britain by Whitchurch (2006b).

  12. 12.

    Whitchurch, before starting her research and teaching career, had a career as a university administrator and manager in four universities in Great Britain.

  13. 13.

    It has been known for a long time that facts and fictions of management (Mintzberg 1975) are difficult to separate and have to fit organisationally (Mintzberg 1981). For universities as loosely coupled systems (Weick 1976), the management requires an enormous effort of time and personnel. Rather the “garbage-can model of decision-making” (Cohen et al. 1972) became famous, which was used to explicate the decision making of the organised anarchy in institutions of higher education as highly differentiated social organisations (Dill 1996, p. 51).

References

  • Abbot, A. (1988). The systems of professions. An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adamczak, W., Debusmann, R., Krause, E., & Merkator, N. (2007). Traumberuf ForschungsreferentIn? (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 69). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research (INCHER-Kassel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. (Ed.). (1996). The international academic profession. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P. G., & Teichler, U. (2001). Internationalisation and exchanges in a globalized university. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Jones, G. A., & Karseth, B. (Eds.). (2002). Governing higher education. National perspectives on institutional governance. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaral, A., Meek, L., & Larsen, I. (Eds.). (2003). The higher education managerial revolution? Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Auferkorte-Michaelis, N. (2008). Innerinstitutionelle Hochschulforschung—Balanceakt zwischen nutzenorientierter Forschung und reflektierter Praxis. In K. Zimmermann, M. Kamphans, & S. Metz-Göckel (Eds.), Perspektiven der Hochschulforschung (pp. 87–96). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchetti, R. (1978). Forecasting and planning in higher education. AITEA Newsletter, 3(3), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R., & Middlehurs, R. (1993). The lost profession. Higher Education in Europe, 18(2), 110–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becher, T., & Kogan, M. (1992). Process and structure in higher education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, B. R. (1991). Bloated administration: Blighted campuses. Academe, 77, 12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin Communiqué. (2003). Realising the European Higher Education Area, Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bologna Declaration. (1999). The Joint Declaration of the European Ministers of Education in Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blümel, A., Kloke, K., Krücken, G., & Netz, N. (2010). Restrukturierung statt Expansion. Entwicklung im Bereich des nichtwissenschaftlichen Personals an deutschen Hochschulen. Die Hochschule, 20(2), 154–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blümel, A., Kloke, K., & Krücken, G. (2011). Professionalisierungsprozesse im Hochschulmanagement in Deutschland. In A. Langer & A. Schröer (Eds.), Professionalisierung im Nonprofit Management (pp. 105–127). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, H. de, Enders, J., & Schimank, U. (2007). On the way towards new public management? The governance of university systems in England, the Netherlands, Austria, and Germany. In D. Jansen (Ed.), New forms of governance in research organizations—disciplinary approaches, interfaces and integration (pp. 37–152). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, H. de, Goedegebuure, L., & Meek, V. L. (2010). The changing nature of academic middle management: A framework for analysis. In V. L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, R. Santiago, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), The changing dynamics of higher education middle management (pp. 229–241). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bosetzky, H., & Heinrich, P. (1989). Mensch und Organisation. Aspekte bürokratischer Sozialisation (Schriftenreihe Verwaltung in Praxis und Wissenschaft, 15.) (4th ed.). Köln: Deutscher Gemeindeverlag und Verlag W. Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E., Altbach, P., & Whitelaw, M.-J. (1994). The academic profession. An international perspective. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D., & Merrien, F. X. (Eds.). (1999). Towards a new model of governance for universities? A comparative view. London: Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., Locke, W., & Naidoo, N. (2007). United Kingdom: An increasingly differentiated profession. In W. Locke & U. Teichler (Eds.), The changing conditions for academic work and careers in selected countries (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 67, pp. 163–176). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER-Kassel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brint, S. (1994). In an age of experts. The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., & Gold, M. (2007). Academics on non-standard contracts in UK universities: Portfolio work, choice and compulsion. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(4), 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. (2003). Leadership and academic culture in the senate presidency: An interpretive view. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 946–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashmore, A., & Ramsden, P. (2009). Reward and recognition in higher education—institutional policies and their implementation. York: Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. S. (1993). Changing roles of institutional research in strategic management. Research in Higher Education, 34(5), 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (Ed.). (1987). The academic profession. National, disciplinary and institutional settings. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (Ed.). (1984). Perspectives on higher education. Eight disciplinary and comparative views. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, T., & Clegg, S. (2000). Management paradigms for the new millennium. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S. (2007). Forms of knowing and academic development practice. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 403–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., & McAuley, J. (2005). Conceptualising middle management in higher education: A multifaceted discourse. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coaldrake, P. (2000). Rethinking academic and university work. Higher Education Management, 12(2), 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. (2000a). What’s in a name? Issues for ATEM and administrators. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 22(2), 199–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. (2000b). Defining administrators and new professionals. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 4(1), 14–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M. (2007). Inherent uncertainty. The association for tertiary education management 1976–2006. New York: Association for Tertiary Education Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, R. (1997). Higher education in the learning society. Report of the National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education. London: HMSO. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/. Accessed Apr 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearlove, J. (1998). The deadly dull issue of university administration? Good governance, managerialism and organising academic work. Higher Education Policy, 11(1), 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (1998). ‘New Managerialism’ and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2006). Changing research perspectives on the management of higher education: Can research permeate the activities of manager-academics? Higher Education Quarterly, 60(3), 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, A. M. (1997). The role of institutional research in higher education: Enabling researchers to meet new challenges. Research in Higher Education, 38(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detmer, H., & Preissler, U. (2004). Abenteuer W—Strategien, Risiken und Chancen: Aktuelles zur W-Besoldung. Forschung und Lehre, 6, 308–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detmer, H., & Preissler, U. (2006). Die W-Besoldung und ihre Anwendung in den Bundesländern. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 28(2), 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (1982). The management of academic culture: Notes on the management of meaning and social integration. Higher Education, 11(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (1996). Academic planning and organizational design: Lessons from leading American universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 50(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D. (1999). Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organization. Higher Education, 38(2), 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 63–82). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, I., & Conway, M. (2003). Fear and loathing in university staffing: The case of Australian academic and general staff. Higher Education Management and Policy, 15(3), 123–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dressel, P. (1981). The shaping of institutional research and planning. Research in Higher Education, 14(3), 229–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1968). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, D. D. (2003). Accountability, democratic theory, and higher education. Educational Policy, 17(1), 60–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, R. (2005). Why universities need institutional researches and institutional researches need faculty members more than both realize. Research in Higher Education, 46(3), 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E. (1995). Where is the faculty voice in recent academic decisions? Tertiary Education and Management, 1(1), 31–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E. (1996). One professoriate or many? Assessing aspects of differentiation among academics. Tertiary Education and Management, 2(2), 146–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1995a). Berufsbild der Lehrenden und Forschenden an Hochschulen. Ergebnisse einer Befragung des wissenschaftlichen Personals an westdeutschen Hochschulen. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1995b). Das Selbstbild des Hochschullehrerberufs im internationalen Vergleich. Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 24(9), 489–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, J., & Teichler, J. (1997). A victim of its own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 34(2), 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1998). The endless transition: A “Triple Helix” of university-industry-government relations. Minerva, 36, 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 22” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2003). Professionalization and professionalism: Explaining professional performance initiatives. In H. Mieg (Ed.), Professionelle Leistung—Professional Performance. Positionen der Professionssoziologie (pp. 49–69). Konstanz: UVK-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and new public management: Changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8(2), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. (1984). Institutional research and decision making: A bibliographic essay. Research in Higher Education, 20(3), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. (1978a). On the predictable crisis of institutional research. Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. (1978b). Institutional research as organizational intelligence. Research in Higher Education, 8(2), 189–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. (1981). Is there an institution in institutional research? Research in Higher Education, 14(2), 179–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. (1982). The missing link in institutional evolution. Research in Higher Education, 17(1), 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. (1987). Improving institutional memory. Research in Higher Education, 26(4), 431–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. (1996). Institutional change and evolution. Research in Higher Education, 37(4), 503–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincher, C. (2000). Words and numbers. Research in Higher Education, 41(4), 527–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. J., & Schuster, J. H. (2001). Assessing the silent revolution: How changing demographics are reshaping the academic profession. American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, 54(2), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, P., & Maassen, P. (1996). Academics and institutional governance: An international comparative analysis of governance issues in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. In P. Maassen & F. A. Vught van (Eds.), Inside academia: New challenges for the academic profession. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, G., & Whitchurch, C. (Eds.). (2010). Academic and professional identities in higher education. The challenges of a diversifying workforce. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gornall, L. (1999). ‘New professionals’: Change and occupational roles in higher education. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 3(2), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å. (1999). Governmental policies and organisational change in higher education. Higher Education, 38(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, A., & Larsen, I. (2004). Towards professionalisation? Restructuring of administrative work force in universities. Higher Education, 47(4), 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gornitzka, Å., Kyvik, S., & Larsen, I. (1998). The bureaucratisation of universities. Minerva, 36(1), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2009). Investing in early career general staff. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(2), 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. (2010). Hearing the voices of general staff: A Delphi Study of the contributions of general staff to student outcomes. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(3), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumport, P. J., & Pusser, B. (1995). A case of bureaucratic accretion: Context and consequences. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(5), 493–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halstead, K. (1991). Higher education revenues and expenditures. Washington: Research Associates of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, W. L., & Guidugli, T. F. (1990). Comparing faculty and employment gains for higher education administrators and faculty members. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 142–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harloe, M., & Perry, B. (2005). Rethinking or hollowing out the university? External engagement and internal transformation in the knowledge economy. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(2), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2002). Academic identity in transformation? The case of the United Kingdom. Higher Education Management and Policy, 14(3), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy. Higher Education, 49(1–2), 155–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2007). Shifting boundaries and the academic profession. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 65, pp. 191–204). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER Kassel) and UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Kuh, G., & Olsen, D. (2001a). Finding fruit on the vines: Using higher education research and institutional research to guide institutional policies and strategies. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossler, D., Kuh, G., & Olsen, D. (2001b). Finding (more) fruit on the vines: Using higher education research and institutional research to guide institutional policies and strategies (Part II). Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakob, A. K., & Teichler, U. (2009). Employment, work, career: The changing situation of the academic profession in Germany. Full conference paper. http://www.uni-due.de/personal/PmWiki/uploads/Lehrstuhl/JacobTeichler2009.pdf. Accessed Jun 2012.

  • Jakob, A. K., & Teichler, U. (2011). Der Wandel des Hochschullehrerberufs im internationalen Vergleich. Ergebnisse einer Befragung in den Jahren 2007/08. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallenberg, A. J. (2007). Strategic innovation in higher education: The roles of academic middle managers. Tertiary Education and Management, 13(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M. (2006a). Neue Hochschulprofessionen: die ‘heimlichen’ Manager? In HRK (Ed.), Von der Qualitätssicherung der Lehre zur Qualitätsentwicklung als Prinzip der Hochschulsteuerung. Projekt Qualitätssicherung (Beiträge zur Hochschulpolitik, Vol. 2, pp. 258–265). Bonn: HRK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M. (2006b). Strengthening quality through qualifying mid-level management. In M. Fremerey & M. Pletsch-Betancourt (Eds.), Prospects of change in higher education. Towards new qualities and relevance. Festschrift for Matthias Wesseler (pp. 161–171). Frankfurt a. M.: IKO Verlag für Interkulturelle Kommunikation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M. (2006c). Professionalizing management in higher education institutions. In J. L. N. Audy & M. C. Morosini (Eds.), Inovação e empreendedorismo na Universidade/Innovation and entrepreneurialism in the university (pp. 231–246). Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M., & Lanzendorf, U. (2005). Ein neues Governance-Regime für die Hochschulen—mehr Markt und weniger Selbststeuerung? In U. Teichler & R. Tippelt (Eds.), Hochschullandschaft im Wandel (pp. 41–55). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M., & Lanzendorf, U. (Eds.). (2006). Reforming university governance. Changing conditions for research in four European countries. Bonn: Lemmens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M., & Lanzendorf, U. (2007). The impacts of university management on academic work. Management Revue, 18(2), 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M., Mayer, E., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2008a). Hochschulen in neuer Verantwortung. Strategisch, überlastet, divers? Bonn: Lemmens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M., Mayer, E., & Teichler, U. (2008b). Resümee der Herausgeber. Auf dem Weg zum Ausbau und zur Stabilisierung der Hochschulprofessionen. In B. M. Kehm, E. Mayer, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Hochschulen in neuer Verantwortung. Strategisch, überlastet, divers? (pp. 198–200) Bonn: Lemmens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M., Merkator, N., & Schneijderberg, C. (2010). Hochschulprofessionelle?! Die unbekannten Wesen. ZFHE—Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 5(4), 23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinser, K. (2002). Faculty at private for-profit universities: The university of phoenix as a new model? International Higher Education, 28, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloke, K., & Krücken, G. (2010). Grenzstellenmanager zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft? Eine Studie zu MitarbeiterInnen und Mitarbeitern in Einrichtungen des Technologie-Transfers und der wissenschaftlichen Weiterbildung. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 32(3), 32–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp, M., & Teichler, U. (2008). Experten für das Hochschulsystem: Hochschulprofessionen zwischen Wissenschaft und Administration. In B. M. Kehm, E. Mayer, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Hochschulen in neuer Verantwortung. Strategisch, überlastet, divers? (pp. 169–171). Bonn: Lemmens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, W., Moore, M., & Coperthwaite, C. (1997). Institutional research: Knowledge, skills, and perceptions of effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, 38(4), 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P., Baume, D., & Yorke, M. (2007). Enhancing part-time teaching in higher education: A challenge for institutional policy and practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(4), 420–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M. (2007). The academic profession and its interface with management. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 65, pp. 159–174). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER Kassel) and UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2007a). Key challenges to the academic profession (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 65). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER Kassel) and UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., & Teichler, U. (2007b). Key challenges to the academic profession and its interface with management: Some introductory thoughts. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 65, pp. 9–16). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER Kassel) and UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G. (2003). Mission impossible? Institutional barriers to the diffusion of the “third academic mission” at German universities. International Journal of Technology Management, 25(1/2), 18–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G., Meier, F., & Müller, A. (2007). Information, cooperation, and the blurring of boundaries—technology transfer in German and American discourses. Higher Education, 53(6), 675–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krücken, G., Blümel, A., & Kloke, K. (2009). Towards organizational actorhood of universities: Occupational and organizational change within German university administrations. Speyer: Deutsches Forschungsinstitut für öffentliche Verwaltung (FÖV—Discussion Paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. L., & Rhoades, G. (1995). Rising administrative costs. Seeking explanations. The Journal of Higher Education, 66(2), 187–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, L. (1990). Long run trends in administrative salaries. CUPA Journal, 41(Summer), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L. S., & Altbach, P. G. (1995). Faculty versus administration. A universal problem. International Higher Education, 2, 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, W., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2007). The changing conditions for academic work and careers in selected countries (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 67). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER-Kassel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, G. (1996). Continuity and transition in university management: The role of the professional administrative service. Higher Education Management and Policy, 8(2), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch J. W., Baughman J. P., Reece J., & Mintzberg H. (1978). Understanding management. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2010). Professors as intellectual leaders: Formation, identity and role. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2011a). The morphing of academic practice: Unbundling and the rise of the para-academic. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, B. (2011b). Prizes, pedagogic research and teaching professors: Lowering the status of teaching and learning through bifurcation. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 127–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W. F., & Warner, T. R. (1990). The lattice and the ratchet. Policy Perspectives, 2(4) 1–8, (Pew Higher Education Research Program, The University of Pennsylvania). http://www.thelearningalliance.info/Docs/Jan2004/DOC-2004Jan12-1073931090.pdf. Accessed Jun 2012.

  • Massy, W. F., & Warner, T. R. (1991). National symposium on strategic higher education finance and management issues: Proceedings, causes and cures of cost escalation in college and university administrative and support services (pp. 179–199). Washington: National Association of College and University Business Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massy, W. F., Wilger, A. K., & Colbeck, C. (1994). Overcoming ‘hollowed’ collegiality. Change, 26, 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C. (1992). Changes in the nature of academic work. Australian universities’ Review, 35(2), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C. (1998). Academics and professional administrators in Australian universities: Dissolving boundaries and new tension. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 20(2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C. (2002). Signs of disengagement? Responding to the changing work and study patterns of full-time undergraduates in Australian universities. In J. Enders & O. Fulton (Eds.), Higher education in a globalising world. International trends and mutual observations (pp. 175–190). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C. (2010). Traditions of academic professionalism and shifting academic identities. In G. Gordon & C. Whitchurch (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education. The challenges of a diversifying workforce (pp. 147–166). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, B., & Hindera, J. (1992). Science and institutional research. The links. Research in Higher Education, 33(1), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2010a). Introduction. In V. L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, R. Santiago, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), The changing dynamics of higher education middle management (pp. 1–14). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., & De Boer, H. (2010b). The changing role of academic leadership in Australia and the Netherlands: Who is the modern dean? In V. L. Meek, L. Goedegebuure, R. Santiago, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), The changing dynamics of higher education middle management (pp. 31–54). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (2000). Higher education professionals for the twenty-first century. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 4(4), 100–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (2004). Changing internal governance: A discussion of leadership roles and management structures in UK universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R. (2010). Developing higher education professionals. Challenges and possibilities. In G. Gordon & C. Whitchurch (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education. The challenges of a diversifying workforce (pp. 223–243). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R., & Elton, L. (1992). Leadership and management in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 17(3), 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R., & Kennie, T. (1995). Leadership and professionals: Comparative frameworks. Tertiary Education and Management, 1(2), 120–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1975). The manager’s job—folklore and fact. Harvard Business Review, 53(4), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1981). Organization design: Fashion or fit. Harvard Business Review, 59(1), 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (1984). Boss sizing as a required skill in institutional research. Research in Higher Education, 21(3), 353–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G. C. (1996). On justifying the different claims to academic freedom. Minerva, 34(129), 150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, J.-G., Detmer, A., & Vieira, M.-J. (Eds.). (2010). Good practices in university-enterprise partnerships (GOODUEP). Valencia: Valencia University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, M. V. da, & Bolan, V. (2008). Academic and managerial skills of academic deans: A self-assessment perspective. Tertiary Education and Management, 14(4), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2006). Drittmittel und Publikationen. Forschung zwischen Normalwissenschaft und Innovation. Soziologie, 4, 440–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2007). Die akademische Elite. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münch, R. (2009). Globale Eliten, lokale Autoritäten. Bildung und Wissenschaft unter dem Regime von PISA, McKinsey, & Co. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musselin, C. (2007). Transformation of academic work: Facts and analysis. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 65, pp. 175–190). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER Kassel) and UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naschold, F., & Bogumil, J. (2000). Modernisierung des Staates: New Public Management in deutscher und internationaler Perspektive (2nd ed.). Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. (2005). Euro-Philiacs, Euro-Sceptics and Europhobics. Higher Education Policy, 11(2), 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G., & Amaral, A. (2008). On process, progress, success and methodology or the unfolding of the Bologna Process as it appears to two reasonably benign observers. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(1/2), 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From “Pure” to “Hybrid” professionalism. Present-day professionalism in ambiguous public domains. Administration and Society, 39(6), 761–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oevermann, U. (2005). Wissenschaft als Beruf. Die Professionalisierung wissenschaftlichen Handelns und die gegenwärtige Universitätsentwicklung. Die Hochschule, 1, 15–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1968). The academic system: A sociologist’s view. The Public Interest, 13(Special issue), 173–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Platt, G. M. (1968). Considerations on the American academic system. Minerva, 6(4), 497–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Platt, G. M. (1970). Age, social structure, and socialization in higher education. Sociology of Education, 43(1), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Platt, G. M. (1973). The American university. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowman, C. (1977). Professionalism in university administration. AITEA Newsletter, 2(1), 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prag Communiqué. (2001). Towards the European Higher Education Area, Communiqué of the Meeting of European Ministers in Charge of Higher Education in Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. (2006). Trends in the restructuring of German universities. Comparative Education Review, 50(2), 90–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. I. (2002). New managerialism, professional power and organisational governance in UK universities. In A. Amaral, G. A. Jones, & B. Karseth (Eds.), Governing higher education. National perspectives on institutional governance (pp. 163–186). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (1984). Conditioned demand and professional response. Higher Education, 13(2), 139–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (1998). Managed professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring academic labor. Albany: State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (2001). Managing productivity in an academic institution: Rethinking the whom, which, what, and whose of productivity. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (2006). The higher education we choose: A question of balance. The Review of Higher Education, 29(3), 381–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (2007). The study of the academic profession. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education. Contributions and their contexts (pp. 113–146). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002a). New models of management and shifting modes and costs of production. Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education and Management, 8, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002b). Quality assurance in Europe and the U. S. professional and political economic framing of higher education policy. Higher Education, 43(3), 355–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B., & Gentemann, K. (1989). The value of institutional research in the assessment of institutional effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, 30(3), 345–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, V. J. (2004). A National Study on mid-level leaders in higher education: The unsung professionals in the academy. Higher Education, 48(3), 317–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimank, U. (2005). “New Public Management” and the academic profession: Reflections on the German situation. Minerva, 43, 361–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneijderberg, C., & Merkator, N. (2011). Hochschulprofessionen und Professionalisierung im Bereich der Qualitätsentwicklung. Qualität in der Wissenschaft, 5(1), 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneijderberg, C., & Teichler, U. (2010). Partnerschaften von Hochschulen und Unternehmen—Erfahrungen im europäischen Vergleich. Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, 32(3), 8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebalj, D., & Holbrook, A. (2009). The profile of university research services staff. Australian Universities’ Review, 51(1), 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2000). Managing modern universities. in my view. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 4(2), 33–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, L. (2010). Research managers uncovered: Changing roles and ‘shifting arenas’ in the academy. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, P. (1983). Professionalism in educational administration. Geelong: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (1993). Changes in intellectual property status and policies at a public university: Revising the terms or professional labour. Higher Education, 26, 287–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloper, D. (1975). University administration as a profession. Master of Educational Administration thesis, University of New England, Armidale, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sporn, B. (2001). Building adaptive universities: Emerging organisational forms based on experiences of European and US universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. (2009). Personal an Hochschulen, Fachserie 11, Reihe 4.4. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, N. (1994). Arbeit, Eigentum und Wissen. Zur Theorie von Wissensgesellschaften. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stehr, N., & Grundmann, R. (2010). Expertenwissen. Die Kultur und die Macht von Experten, Beratern und Ratgebern. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (1994). Wissenschaft, Universität, Profession. Soziologische Analysen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stichweh, R. (2008). Universität nach Bologna. Zur sozialen Form der Massenuniversität. Luzerner Universitätsreden (pp. 7–12). http://www.unilu.ch/files/Luzerner_Unireden_19.pdf. Accessed Jun 2012.

  • Teichler, U. (1996). The conditions of the academic profession. an international, comparative analysis of the academic profession in Western Europe, Japan and the USA. In Centrum voor Studies van het Hoger Onderwijsbeleid (Ed.), Inside academia. New challenges for the academic profession, in cooperation with F. vanVught & P. Massen (pp. 15–65). Utrecht: De Tijdstroom (Management en beleid in het hoger onderwijs, 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (1998). Massification: A challenge for institutions of higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 4(1), 17–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2003). The future of higher education and the future of higher education research. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(3), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2004). The changing debate on internationalisation of higher education. Higher Education, 48(1), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2005). Quantitative und strukturelle Entwicklung des Hochschulwesens. In U. Teichler & R. Tippelt (Eds.), Hochschullandschaft im Wandel. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik Oktober 2005 (50. Beiheft) (pp. 8–24). Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2007a). Germany and beyond: New dynamics for the academic profession. In W. Locke & U. Teichler (Eds.), The changing conditions for academic work and careers in selected countries (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 67, pp. 15–38). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER-Kassel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2007b). Higher education systems. Conceptual frameworks, comparative perspectives, empirical findings. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler, U. (2008). Hochschulforschung international. In K. Zimmermann, M. Kamphans, & S. Metz-Göckel (Eds.), Perspektiven der Hochschulforschung (pp. 65–86). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teodorescu, D. (2006). Institutional researchers as knowledge managers in universities: Envisioning new roles for the IR profession. Tertiary Education and Management, 12(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terenzini, P. T. (1993). On the nature of institutional research and the knowledge and skills it requires. Research in Higher Education, 34(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2010). Are academic workloads increasing? The post-war survey evidence in the UK. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(2), 200–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topley, J. (1990). Enhancing the impact of professional administrators. Journal of Tertiary Education Administration, 12(2), 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1974). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. In OECD (Ed.), Policies for higher education (pp. 51–101). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1999). From mass higher education to universal access: The American advantage. Minerva, 37, 303–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (2010). Managerialism and the academic profession: The case of England. In M. Burrage (Ed.), Martin Trow. Twentieth-century higher education. Elite to mass to universal (pp. 269–298). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press (first published as: Trow, M. (1993). Managerialism and the academic profession: The case of England. Stockholm: Council for Studies of Higher Education.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (1998). What managerialists forget: Higher education credit frameworks and managerialist ideology. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 91–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vabø, A. (2007). Challenges of internationalization for the academic profession in Norway. In M. Kogan & U. Teichler (Eds.), Key challenges to the academic profession (Werkstattberichte, Vol. 65, pp. 99–110). Kassel: International Centre for Higher Education Research Kassel (INCHER Kassel) and UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visakorpi, J. K. (1996). Academic and administrative interface: Application to national circumstances. Higher Education Management and Policy, 8(2), 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein, F. J. (1999). The four faces of institutional research. In F. J. Volkwein & S. Lanasa (Eds.), What is institutional research all about? A critical and comprehensive assessment of the profession: New directions for institutional research (No. 104, pp. 9–19). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. R. (1997a). All change? The professoriate in uncertain times. Higher Education, 34(3), 299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, A. R. (1997b). The peripatetic professor: The internationalisation of the academic profession. Higher Education, 34(3), 323–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2004). Administrative managers. a critical link. Higher Education Quarterly, 58(4), 280–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2006a). Who do they think they are? The changing identities of professional administrators and managers in UK higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 28(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2006b). Professional managers in UK higher education: Preparing for complex futures. Unpublished paper. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. https://www.lfhe.ac.uk/protected/whitchurchfinal.pdf. Accessed Jun 2012.

  • Whitchurch, C. (2008a). Beyond administration and management: Reconstructing the identities of professional staff in UK higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(4), 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2008b). Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2009). The rise of the blended professional in higher education: A comparison between the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States. Higher Education, 58(3), 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2010a). Optimising the potential of third space professionals in higher education. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung, 5(4), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2010b). Some implications of ‘Public/Private Space’ for professional identities in higher education. Higher Education, 60(6), 627–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C. (2010c). Convergence and divergence in professional identities. In G. Gordon & C. Whitchurch (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce. International Studies in Higher Education (pp. 167–183). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C., & Gordon, G. (2010). Diversifying academic and professional identities in higher education. some management challenges. Tertiary Education and Management, 16(2), 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitchurch, C., Skinner, M., & Lauwerys, J. (2009). Professional staff in UK universities: Recent developments. Australian Universities’ Review, 51(1), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkesmann, U., & Schmidt, C. J. (2011). The impact of new governance on teaching at German universities. Findings from a National Survey in Germany. Higher Education, published online 9 Apr 2011. doi:1007/s10734-011-9423-1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneijderberg, C., Merkator, N. (2013). The New Higher Education Professionals. In: Kehm, B., Teichler, U. (eds) The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4614-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics