Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding the Value of VGI

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge

Abstract

Growing investments of time, money and other resources in the production of geographic information (GI) in concert with the increasingly widespread use of GI throughout society are often accompanied by statements that reference the economic, cultural and social value of GI. Despite considerable effort over the past decade, our capacity to quantify the value of GI or even understand how value should be conceptualized remains limited. The recent emergence of volunteered geographic information (VGI) has introduced several new facets to the challenge of understanding the value of (V)GI. This chapter examines how VGI use and production are challenging our understanding of how GI and VGI alike are valued. Following a review of the traditional approaches to valuing GI, the chapter explores the distinctive characteristics of VGI use and production that introduce new dimensions to value. More specifically, the chapter proposes several metaphors (serendipitous and unexpected discovery, Debord’s ‘Dérives’ metaphor, Lego block theory) that can be used to conceptualize VGI value and the potential to adapt the ‘fitness-for-use’ concept to guide user assessments of VGI value in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACIL Tasman (2008). The value of spatial information: The impact of modern spatial information technologies on the Australian economy. Report prepared for the CRC for Spatial Information and ANZLIC, the Spatial Information Council, Australia. http://www.anzlic.org.au/Publications/Industy/Downloads_GetFile.aspx?id=251. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • Bourcier, D., & Van Andel, P. (Eds.). (2008). La Sérendipité: Le hasard heureux. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond. From production to produsage. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budhathoki, N. R., Bruce, B., & Nedovic-Budic, Z. (2008). Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure. GeoJournal, 72, 149–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P. A., & McDonnell, R. A. (1998). Principles of geographic information systems (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, N.R. (1983). The role of quality information in the long term functioning of a Geograph­ical Information System. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automated Cartography (Auto Carto 6), Ottawa, Canada, pp. 303–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, D. J., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonté, J. (2009). Volunteered geographic information: The nature and motivation of produsers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructure Research, 4, 332–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craglia, M., & Nowak, J. (2006). Report of international workshop on spatial data infrastructures: Cost-benefit/return on investment: Assessing the impacts of spatial data infrastructures, European Commission, Directorate General Joint Research Centre (Technical report). Ispra: Institute for Environment and Sustainability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompvoets, J., de Man, E., & Macharis, C. (2010). Value of spatial data: Networked performance beyond economic rhetoric. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 5, 96–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debord, G. E. (1958). Théorie de la dérive, Internationnale situationniste, n.2, décembre. http://debordiana.chez.com/francais/is2.htm#theorie. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • Devillers, R., & Jeansoulin, R. (Eds.). (2006). Fundamentals of spatial data quality. London: ISTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didier, M. (1990). Utilité et valeur de l’information géographique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, J. E., & Fisher, P. F. (2003 Spring). Geoslavery. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C. (2011). “GeoLearning”: Tricorders – The next tool for geographic learning? ArcNews, Winter 2010/2011. http://www.esri.com/news/arcnews/winter1011articles/tricorders.html. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • Elwood, S. (2010). Geographic information science: Emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 349–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011). Privacy reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42(1), 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2008). The credibility of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 72, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Almirall, P., Bergadà, M. M., & Queraltó Ros, P. (2008). The socio- economic impact of the spatial data infrastructure of Catalonia, European Commission, EUR 23300 EN. Accessed January 2, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, E., Cotteret, G., Roche, S., Caron, C., & Feick, R. (2009a). Evaluating the socio-economic impact of geographic information: A classification of the literature. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructure Research, 4, 218–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, E., Roche, S., & Caron, C. (2009b). The value chain approach to evaluate the economic impact of geographic information: Towards a new visual tool. In B. van Loenen, J. W. J. Besemer, & J. A. Zevenberger (Eds.), SDI convergence: Research, emerging trends, and critical assessment (pp. 175–187). http://www.gsdi.org/gsdiconf/gsdi11/SDICnvrgncBook.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • Genovese, E., Roche, S., Caron, C., & Feick, R. (2010). The ecoGeo cookbook for the assessment of geographic information value. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructure Research, 5, 120–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • GITA (2007). Building a business case for shared geospatial data and services: A practitioners guide to financial and strategic analysis for a multi-participant program. http://www.fgdc.gov/policyandplanning/50states/roiworkbook.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 2, 24–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F. (2008). Commentary: Whither VGI? GeoJournal, 72, 239–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M. F., & Glennon, J. A. (2010). Crowdsourcing geographic information for disaster response: A research frontier. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(3), 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M., & Zook, M. (2011). Visualizing global cyberscapes: Mapping user-generated placemarks. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(1), 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grira, J., Bédard, Y., & Roche, S. (2010). Spatial data uncertainty in the VGI world: Going from consumer to producer. Geomatica, 64(1), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M. (2010). How good is volunteered geographic information? A comparative study of OpenStreetMap and ordnance survey datasets. Environment and Planning B, 37, 682–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., Chipeniuk, R., Feick, R., Leahy, M., & Deparday, V. (2010). Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0. International Journal of Geographic Information Science, 24(5), 761–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halsing, D., Theissen, K., & Bernknopf, R. (2004). A cost-benefit analysis of the National Map. Circular 1271, U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2004/1271. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • Krek, A. (2006). Geographic information as an economic good. In M. Campagna (Ed.), GIS for sustainable development. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krek, A., & Frank, A. U. (2000). The production of geographic information – The value tree. Geo-Informations-Systeme – Journal for Spatial Information and Decision Making 13(3), 10–12. ftp://ftp.geoinfo.tuwien.ac.at/krek/3226_value-tree.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • Longhorn, R., & Blakemore, M. (2008). Geographic information: Value, pricing, production and consumption. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussault, M. (2007). L’homme spatial: la construction sociale de l’espace humain. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, R. A. (1939). The voluntary exchange theory of public economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53(2), 213–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Canada (2006). Résultats du recensement 2004 de l’industrie géomatique (Technical report). Sherbrooke: Natural Resources Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, N. (2006). Measuring the benefits and costs of GIS. In P. Longely, M. Goodchild, D. Maguire, & D. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical information systems: Principles, techniques, management and applications (2nd ed., pp. 601–610). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer, N. (2008). Thoughts on “Volunteered (Geo)Slavery”. http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/projects/vgi/docs/position/Obermeyer_Paper.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • OpenStreetMap (2011). OpenStreetMap Changesets. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • Perkins, C., & Dodge, M. (2009). Satellite imagery and the spectacle of secret spaces. Geoforum, 40, 546–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickles, J. (1995). Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plan géomatique du gouvernement du Québec (PGGQ). (2004). Profil financier de la géomatique des ministères et des organismes (Technical report). Ministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faunes, Québec, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rana, S., & Joliveau, T. (2009). NeoGeography: An extension of mainstream geography for everyone made by everyone? Journal of Location Based Services, 3(2), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E. S. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Cambridge, MA: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L., & Loomis, J. (2009). The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis. Ecological Economics, 68, 1535–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, S. (2011). De la cartographie participative aux WikiSIG. In O. Walser, L. Thévoz, F. Joerin, M. Schuler, S. Joost, B. Debarbieux, & H. Dao (Eds.), Les SIG au service du développement territorial (pp. 117–129). Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, S., & Raveleau, B. (2009). Social use and adoption models of GIS. In S. Roche & C. Caron (Eds.), Organizational facets of GIS (pp. 115–144). London: ISTE Ltd/John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, S., Sureau, K., & Caron, C. (2003). How to improve the social-utility value of geographic information technologies for the French local governments? A Delphi study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(3), 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, S., Propeck-Zimmerman, E., & Mericskay, B. (2011). GeoWeb and risk management: Issues and perspectives of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal. doi:10.1007/s10708-011-9423-9.

  • Rodriguez, P. O. (2005). Cadre théorique pour l’évaluation des infrastructures d’information geospatial. PhD thesis, Département des Sciences Géomatiques, Faculté de Foresterie et de Géomatique, Laval University, Québec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. (2008). The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie’s new tattoo and the future of GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, I., Rajabifard, A., & Holland, P. (2010). Spatially enabled society. Proceedings of the FIG Congress 2010, “Facing the Challenges – Building the Capacity”, Sydney. http://www.fig.net/pub/fig2010/papers/inv03%5Cinv03_williamson_rajabifard_et_al_4134.pdf. Accessed January 2, 2012.

  • Yahoo! (2011). Austrian student takes on Facebook. http://news.yahoo.com/austrian-student-takes-facebook-074701796.html. Accessed December 7, 2011.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Rob Feick

  2. Département des sciences géomatiques, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada

    Stéphane Roche

Authors
  1. Rob Feick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stéphane Roche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rob Feick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Geography, Ohio State University, N. Oval Mall 154, Columbus, 43210, Ohio, USA

    Daniel Sui

  2. Dept. Geography, University of Washington, Seattle, 98195-3550, Washington, USA

    Sarah Elwood

  3. College of Letters & Science, Dept. Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, 93106-4060, California, USA

    Michael Goodchild

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feick, R., Roche, S. (2013). Understanding the Value of VGI. In: Sui, D., Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. (eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation