Postnatal Hyperoxia Impairs Acute Oxygen Sensing of Rat Glomus Cells by Reduced Membrane Depolarization

  • Insook KimEmail author
  • David F. Donnelly
  • John L. Carroll
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 758)


Previous work demonstrated that hyperoxia (30–60% O2) exposure in the post-natal period reduces the ventilatory response to acute hypoxia and this impairment may continue considerably beyond the period of hyperoxia exposure. Previous work from our laboratory demonstrated that 1–2 weeks of hyperoxia (60% O2) starting between P1 and P14: reduced the single chemoreceptor unit response to hypoxia, reduced the rise in glomus cell calcium caused by acute hypoxia and reduced hypoxia-induced catecholamine release (Donnelly 05, Donnelly 09). The present study asked whether the impairment extended to hypoxia-induced membrane depolarization, an earlier step in the transduction cascade. Perforated patch, whole-cell recordings were obtained from rat glomus cells exposed to hyperoxia from P0-P8 or P8-P15 and age-matched control groups. In both cases, hypoxia-induced membrane depolarization was significantly less in the hyperoxia treated groups compared to controls, while depolarization to 20 mM K+ was not significantly affected. Resting membrane potential and input resistance were also not different in the hyperoxia treated groups. Whole carotid body quantitative real time PCR showed that TASK-1, TASK-3 and L-type Ca2+ channel expression was significantly down-regulated at Hyper 8–15 compared to controls. We conclude that 1 week of postnatal hyperoxia during the early and late stage of CB maturation impairs organ function by affecting the coupling between hypoxia and glomus cell depolarization. This may be caused by altered expression of TASK1, TASK3 or L-type Ca2+ channel gene expression. We speculate that an identification of cellular changes caused by hyperoxia may yield unique insights to the mechanism of oxygen sensing by the carotid bodies.


Carotid body Glomus cells Hyperoxia Membrane depolarization Gene expression qPCR Postnatal Impairment 



This study was supported by grants from National Institute of health (HL-073500 (DFD) and HL-05621 (JLC)).


  1. Bavis RW (2005) Developmental plasticity of the hypoxic ventilatory response after perinatal hyperoxia and hypoxia. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 149:287–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bavis RW, Olson EB Jr, Mitchell GS (2002) Critical developmental period for hyperoxia-induced blunting of hypoxic phrenic responses in rats. J Appl Physiol 92:1013–1018PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bavis RW, Young KM, Barry KJ, Boller MR, Kim E, Klein PM, Ovrutsky AR, Rampersad DA (2010) Chronic hyperoxia alters the early and late phases of the hypoxic ventilatory response in neonatal rats. J Appl Physiol 109:796–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bavis RW, Kim I, Pradhan N, Nawreen N, Dmitrieff EF, Carroll JL, Donnelly DF (2011) Recovery of carotid body O2 sensitivity following chronic postnatal hyperoxia in rats. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 177:47–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bisgard GE, Olson EB Jr, Wang ZY, Bavis RW, Fuller DD, Mitchell GS (2003) Adult carotid chemoafferent responses to hypoxia after 1, 2, and 4 wk of postnatal hyperoxia. J Appl Physiol 95:946–952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckler KJ (1997) A novel oxygen-sensitive potassium current in rat carotid body type I cells. J Physiol 498(Pt 3):649–662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckler KJ, Vaughan-Jones RD (1994) Effects of hypoxia on membrane potential and intracellular calcium in rat neonatal carotid body type I cells. J Physiol 476:423–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Donnelly DF, Kim I, Carle C, Carroll JL (2005) Perinatal hyperoxia for 14 days increases nerve conduction time and the acute unitary response to hypoxia of rat carotid body chemoreceptors. J Appl Physiol 99:114–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donnelly DF, Bavis RW, Kim I, Dbouk HA, Carroll JL (2009) Time course of alterations in pre- and post-synaptic chemoreceptor function during developmental hyperoxia. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 168:189–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erickson JT, Mayer C, Jawa A, Ling L, Olson EB Jr, Vidruk EH, Mitchell GS, Katz DM (1998) Chemoafferent degeneration and carotid body hypoplasia following chronic hyperoxia in newborn rats. J Physiol 509(Pt 2):519–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuller DD, Bavis RW, Vidruk EH, Wang ZY, Olson EB Jr, Bisgard GE, Mitchell GS (2002) Life-long impairment of hypoxic phrenic responses in rats following 1 month of developmental hyperoxia. J Physiol 538:947–955PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gore A, Muralidhar M, Espey MG, Degenhardt K, Mantell LL (2010) Hyperoxia sensing: from molecular mechanisms to significance in disease. J Immunotoxicol 7:239–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim D, Cavanaugh EJ, Kim I, Carroll JL (2009) Heteromeric TASK-1/TASK-3 is the major oxygen-sensitive background K  +  channel in rat carotid body glomus cells. J Physiol 587:2963–2975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim D, Papreck JR, Kim I, Donnelly DF, Carroll JL (2011a) Changes in oxygen sensitivity of TASK in carotid body glomus cells during early postnatal development. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 177:228–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim I, Yang D, Tang X, Carroll JL (2011b) Reference gene validation for qPCR in rat carotid body during postnatal development. BMC Res Notes 4:440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ling L, Olson EB Jr, Vidruk EH, Mitchell GS (1997) Developmental plasticity of the hypoxic ventilatory response. Respir Physiol 110:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004) Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper–Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett 26:509–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Summers BA, Overholt JL, Prabhakar NR (2000) Augmentation of L-type calcium current by hypoxia in rabbit carotid body glomus cells: evidence for a PKC-sensitive pathway. J Neurophysiol 84:1636–1644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang ZY, Bisgard GE (2005) Postnatal growth of the carotid body. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 149:181–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wasicko MJ, Sterni LM, Bamford OS, Montrose MH, Carroll JL (1999) Resetting and postnatal maturation of oxygen chemosensitivity in rat carotid chemoreceptor cells. J Physiol 514(Pt 2):493–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Insook Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • David F. Donnelly
    • 2
  • John L. Carroll
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PediatricsACHRI, University of Arkansas for Medical SciencesLittle RockUSA
  2. 2.Department of PediatricsYale University, School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Arkansas Children’s HospitalLittle RockUSA

Personalised recommendations