Advertisement

Propranolol Does Not Affect the Hindlimb Vasodilatation Elicited by Stimulation of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Paraganglia

  • Edward T. O’ConnorEmail author
  • Ken D. O’Halloran
  • James F. X. Jones
Conference paper
  • 3.5k Downloads
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 758)

Abstract

The carotid body (CB) consists of a small, highly vascularised, cluster of cells known as chemoreceptors located at the bifurcation of the common carotid artery. These chemoreceptors “taste” chemical stimuli in the blood and convey impulses to the cardiorespiratory centres of the medulla which then cause appropriate alterations in heart rate, blood pressure and respiration. This information is relayed to the medulla via the glossopharyngeal (IXth cranial) nerve. We are interested in another group of chemoreceptors, referred to as vagal paraganglia, and in particular those found at the bifurcation of the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN), which is the largest paraganglion of the vagus (Xth cranial) nerve in the rat (Hughes et al. 2003).

Keywords

Superior laryngeal nerve Paraganglia Carotid body Vagus nerve Chemoreceptor Propranolol 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge support of The Wellcome Trust (UK) and the School of Medicine and Medical Science UCD, Dublin.

References

  1. Daly MD, Jones JF (1998) Respiratory modulation of carotid and aortic body reflex left ventricular inotropic responses in the cat. J Physiol 509(Pt 3):895–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Daly MD, Robinson BH (1968) An analysis of the reflex systemic vasodilator response elicited by lung inflation in the dog. J Physiol 195(2):387–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Daly M, Ungar A (1966) Comparison of the reflex responses elicited by stimulation of the separately perfused carotid and aortic body chemoreceptors in the dog. J Physiol 182(2):379–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dasgupta NK (1968) On the mechanism of the pressor response due to propranolol. Br J Pharmacol 34(1):200P–201PPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Himori N, Ishimori T (1988) Different responses to beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs of the blood pressure and heart rate in the urethane-anesthetized dog and rat. Jpn J Pharmacol 47(1):71–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hughes K, Pickering M, O’Leary DM, Bradford A, O’Regan RG, Jones JF (2003) The paraganglia of the rat superior laryngeal nerve. Adv Exp Med Biol 536:239–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Maggi CA, Meli A (1986) Suitability of urethane anesthesia for physiopharmacological investigations in various systems. Part 2: cardiovascular system. Experientia 42(3):292–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marshall JM (1987) Analysis of cardiovascular responses evoked following changes in peripheral chemoreceptor activity in the rat. J Physiol 394:393–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. McDonald DM, Blewett RW (1981) Location and size of carotid body-like organs (paraganglia) revealed in rats by the permeability of blood vessels to Evans blue dye. J Neurocytol 10(4):607–643PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Connor ET, O’Halloran KD, Jones JF (2010) The cardiorespiratory reflex effects of stimulation of superior laryngeal nerve paraganglia in the urethane anaesthetised rat. J Physiol Proc Physiol Soc 20:C19 and PC19Google Scholar
  11. O’Leary DM, Murphy A, Pickering M, Jones JF (2004) Arterial chemoreceptors in the superior laryngeal nerve of the rat. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 141(2):137–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward T. O’Connor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ken D. O’Halloran
    • 1
  • James F. X. Jones
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Medicine and Medical ScienceUniversity College DublinBelfield, Dublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations