Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Science Curriculum Reform on ‘Scientific Literacy for All’ Across National Contexts: Case Studies of Curricula from England & Wales and Hong Kong

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science Education for Diversity

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 8))

Abstract

In recent years, a wide range of international policy documents has highlighted the significance of scientific literacy for all students in secondary schooling. Curriculum reform efforts have concentrated on the teaching of science as a goal not only for the education of scientists but also for the broader public. In this sense, the ‘Scientific Literacy for All’ slogan has promoted diversity in the form of a range of students targeted for inclusion in scientific practices and ways of thinking. The key premise of these efforts is that in industrialised and democratic societies, the public needs to be better equipped with scientific reasoning skills for informed decision-making as part of active and informed citizenship. A particular aspect of the move for ‘Scientific Literacy for All’ is the inclusion of themes such the understanding of science in context and the nature of science. In this chapter, we will review the key arguments for including scientific literacy in science teaching and learning. We will then focus on case study analyses of secondary science curricula from England and Hong Kong to illustrate in more depth how the rhetoric of ‘Scientific Literacy for All’ is instantiated. The purpose of these analyses is to highlight effective approaches to policy and implementation of scientific literacy in school science. We will draw from classroom-based research projects such as the Mind the Gap and S-TEAM projects in England and the Learning Science series of research and teacher development projects which aim to enhance teacher understanding of NOS and pedagogical skills for teaching NOS in their classrooms in Hong Kong. We will conclude with a set of recommendations for bridging gaps in policy, research and practice, and achieving diversity through engagement in the ‘Scientific Literacy for All’ agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/population.pdf

  2. 2.

    The teaching resources can be accessed through the website http://learningscience.edu.hku.hk

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performance. In J. N. Mangieri & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. Educational Researcher, 35, 463–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, M., & Kwok, P. (2003). Demand for private supplementary tutoring: conceptual considerations, and socio-economic patterns in Hong Kong. Economics of Education Review, 22, 611–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W. (2007, May 28–29). Scientific literates: what do they do? Who are they? In Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary 2008 symposium promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction, Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., Reveles, J., & Kelly, G. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science education. Science Education, 89, 779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (1997). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Gräber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy. An international symposium (pp. 37–68). Kiel: Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften (IPN).

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC [Curriculum Development Council]. (1998). Science syllabus for secondary 1–3. Hong Kong: CDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • CDC. (2002). Physics/Chemistry/Biology curriculum guide (Secondary 4–5). Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Council. Retrieved August 15, 2011, from http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeID=2824&langno=1

  • CDC-HKEAA. (2007). Physics/Chemistry/Biology/Integrated science curriculum guide and assessment guide (Secondary 4–6). Hong Kong: Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education. (1995). Science in the national curriculum. London: HMSO. ISBN 0 11 270884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment and Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (1999). Science. The National Curriculum for England. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Science. (1988). Science for ages 5 to 16. London: HMSO. x-10-171984-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills and Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (1999). Science. The National Curriculum for England. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills and Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2004). Science. The National Curriculum for England. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R., & Erduran, S. (1996). Modeling the growth of scientific knowledge. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe: Current issues and themes (pp. 153–165). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life, learning through life: Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Education Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (Ed.) (2007). Editorial: Argument, discourse and interactivity. Special Issue of School Science Review, 88(324), 29–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S. (2012). The role of dialogue and argumentation. In J. Oversby (Ed.), Guide to research in science education (pp. 106–116). Hatfield: Association for Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2008). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2012). Research on argumentation in science education in Europe. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe: Retrospective and prospective. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Yan, X. (2009). Minding gaps in argument: Continuous professional development in the teaching of inquiry. Bristol: University of Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Yan, X. (2010). Salvar las brechas en la argumentacion: el desarrollo profesional en la ensenanza de la indagacion cientifica. Alambique, 63, 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Yee, W. C., & Ingram, N. (2012). Assessment and practical inquiry in scientific argumentation. CPD Resource. Bristol: University of Bristol. (www.apisa.co.uk).

  • Gitlin, A., & Margonis, F. (1995). The political aspect of reform: Teacher resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103(4), 377–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gott, R., & Roberts, R. (2004). A written test for procedural understanding: a way forward for assessment in the UK science curriculum? Research in Science and Technological Education, 22(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorde, D. (2009). Mind the gap: Learning, teaching, research and policy in inquiry-based science education (EU FP7, Science in Society, Project No. 217725). Oslo, Norway: University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Velle, B. L., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argument and developments in the science curriculum. School Science Review, 88(324), 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (2004). The literacies of science. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction (pp. 33–47). Newark: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, F. K. S. (2008). In the books there are golden houses: Mathematics assessment in East Asia. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40, 983–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science Education, 17, 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P., McClelland, J. A. G., & Yeung, Y. M. (1994). Higher education in Hong Kong: The context of and rationale for rapid expansion. Higher Education, 27, 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Curriculum Council. (1991). Science in the National Curriculum: A report to the Secretary of State for Education and Science on the statutory consultation for attainment targets and programmes of study in Science. London: NCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, S., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge & skills: A new framework for assessment. Paris: OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Education at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, L. F., Lam, C. C., & Ma, Y. P. (2010). Competition – A double-edged sword in educational change in Mainland China. Educational Research Journal, 25(2), 211–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao, P. K. (2002). A study of students’ focal awareness when studying science stories designed for fostering understanding of the nature of science. Research in Science Education, 32, 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, P. K. (2003). Eliciting and developing junior secondary students’ understanding of the nature of science through a peer collaboration instruction in science stories. International Journal of Science Education, 25(2), 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao, P. K., Yung, H. W., Wong, C. K., & Wong, A. (2000). Living science. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grant Committee. (2010). Aspirations for the higher education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: UGC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. L., Yung, B. H. W., Cheng, M. W., Lam, K. L., & Hodson, D. (2006). Setting the stage for developing pre-service teachers’ conceptions of good science teaching: The role of classroom video. International Journal of Science Education, 28(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. L., Hodson, D., Kwan, J., & Yung, B. H. W. (2008). Turning crisis into opportunity: Enhancing student teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry through a case study of the scientific research in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 1417–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. L., Kwan, J., Hodson, D., & Yung, B. H. W. (2009). Turning crisis into opportunity: Nature of science and scientific inquiry as illustrated in the scientific research on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. Science Education, 18, 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. L., Yung, B. H. W., & Cheng, M. W. (2010). A blow to a decade of effort on promoting teaching of nature of science. In Y.-J. Lee (Ed.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in Asia (pp. 259–276). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, S. L., Wan, Z., & Cheng, M. M. W. (2011). Learning nature of science through socioscientific issues. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: teaching, learning and research (pp. 245–269). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Sibel Erduran’s work on the Mind the Gap and S-TEAM projects was funded by the European Union FP7 Program. Erduran would like to thank Xiaomei Yan of the University of Bristol for assisting in data collection in the Mind the Gap project and Wan Ching Yee in the S-TEAM project.

Siu Ling Wong’s work on the series of professional development and research projects was funded by two Quality Education Funds from the Hong Kong Education Bureau. The project outcomes could not be achievable without the great collaboration with my science colleagues, Dr Benny Yung, Dr Maurice Cheng, Dr Jeffrey Day, Dr. Zhihong Wan, Mr. Eric Yam, Miss Kwan Ling Chan of the University of Hong Kong and Prof. Se-yuen Mak of the Chinese University of Hong Kong. Wong is also grateful to the teacher members of the projects for their participation and the science colleagues in the Education Bureau for their advice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Sibel Erduran

  2. Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Siu Ling Wong

Authors
  1. Sibel Erduran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siu Ling Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibel Erduran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. St Luke's Campus, Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, United Kingdom

    Nasser Mansour

  2. St. Lukes Campus, University of Exeter, Heavitree Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 2LU, United Kingdom

    Rupert Wegerif

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Erduran, S., Wong, S.L. (2013). Science Curriculum Reform on ‘Scientific Literacy for All’ Across National Contexts: Case Studies of Curricula from England & Wales and Hong Kong. In: Mansour, N., Wegerif, R. (eds) Science Education for Diversity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation