Abstract
Over the last few years political declarations by the European Union (EC (European Community), Climate change – Council conclusions 8518/96 (Presse 188-G) 25/26. VI.96, 1996), the G8 (Major Economics Forum, Declaration of the leaders of the major economies forum on energy and climate, MEF, 2009. http://www.g8italia2009.it/static/G8_Allegato/MEF_Declarationl.pdf) and in the Copenhagen Accord (UNFCCC, Draft decision -/CP.15: Proposal by the President. Conference of the Parties, Fifteenth session, Copenhagen, 2010. Retrieved July 6, 2010, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/l07.pdf) have referred to the 2°C target as a potential goal for climate protection. Such an objective is undoubtedly highly ambitious but has not been made a binding target under international law. The Copenhagen Accord also failed to address the willingness of nations to take the necessary measures to attain this target. If the 2°C target is to be pursued by policy-makers, a robust assessment by the scientific community of the side risks and benefits of achieving this mitigation target will be required. This includes the careful evaluation of different technology options and the associated costs of mitigation.
In this chapter we describe the historical challenge of mitigating climate change and present mitigation strategies assessed with intertemporal general equilibrium models. We complement the analysis with a detailed risk assessment of the technology portfolio.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, J., Chiavari, J., de Coninck, H., Shackley, S., Sigurthorsson, G., Flach, T., Reiner, D., Upham, P., Richardson, P., & Curnow, P. (2009). Results from the project ‘Acceptance of CO2 capture and storage: Economics, policy and technology (ACCSEPT)’. Energy Procedia, 1(1), 4649–4653.
Barrett, S. (2008). The incredible economics of geoengineering. Environmental and Resource Economics, 39(1), 45–54.
BGR (Bundesamt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe). (2009). Energierohstoffe 2009: Reserven, Ressourcen,Verfügbarkeit. Hannover: Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources.
Boden, T. A., Marland, G., & Andres, R. J. (2009). Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO 2 emissions. Oak Ridge: Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy. doi:10.3334/CDIAC/00001.
Clarke, L., Edmonds, J., Krey, V., Richels, R., Rose, S., & Tavoni, M. (2009). International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 international scenarios. Energy Economics, 31, 64–81.
de Coninck, H., Stephens, J., & Metz, B. (2009). Global learning on carbon capture and storage: A call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energy Policy, 37(6), 2161–2165.
EC (European Community). (1996). Climate change – Council conclusions 8518/96 (Presse 188-G) 25/26. VI.96.
Edenhofer, O., Knopf, B., Barker, T., Baumstark, L., Bellevrat, E., Chateau, B., Criqui, P., Isaac, M., Kitous, A., Kypreos, S., Leimbach, M., Lessmann, K., Magné, B., Scrieciu, S., Turton, H., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2010). The economics of low stabilization: Model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. The Energy Journal, 31, 11–48 (Special Issue 1).
Hofmann, M., & Schellnhuber, H.-J. (2009). Oceanic acidification affects marine carbon pump and triggers extended marine oxygen holes. PNAS, 106(9), 3017–3022.
IEA (International Energy Agency). (2007a). Energy balances of OECD countries 1960–2005. Manchester: Energy Statistics Division. University of Manchester: ESDS International.
IEA (International Energy Agency). (2007b). Energy balances of non-OECD countries 1971–2005. Manchester: Energy Statistics Division University of Manchester: ESDS International.
IEA (International Energy Agency). (2009). World energy outlook 2009. Paris: IEA.
IPCC. (2005). IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. In B. Metz, O. Davidson, H. C. de Coninck, M. Loos, & L. A. Meyer (Eds.). In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, & C. von Stechow (Eds.). Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. (2011). IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. In O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, P. Matschoss, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, P. Eickemeier, G. Hansen, S. Schlömer, & C. von Stechow (Eds.). Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Keith, D. W., Parson, E., & Morgan, M. G. (2010). Research on global sun block needed now: Opinion. Nature, 463, 426–427. doi:10.1038/463426a.
Knopf, B., Edenhofer, O., Barker, T., Bauer, N., Baumstark, L., Chateau, B., Criqui, P., Held, A., Isaac, M., Jakob, M., Jochem, E., Kitous, A., Kypreos, S., Leimbach, M., Magné, B., Mima, S., Schade, W., Scrieciu, S., Turton, H., & van Vuurenm, D. (2009). The economics of low stabilisation: Implications for technological change and policy. In M. Hulme & H. Neufeldt (Eds.), Making climate change work for us: European perspectives on adaptation and mitigation strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Knopf, B., Edenhofer, O., Flachsland, C., Kok, M. T. J., Lotze-Campen, H., Luderer, G., Popp, A., & Van Vuuren, D. P. (2010). Managing the low-carbon transition – From model results to policies. Energy Journal, 31, 223–245.
Knopf, B., Luderer, G., & Edenhofer, O. (2011). Exploring the feasibility of low mitigation targets. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2, 617–626. doi:10.1002/wcc.124.
Krey, V., & Clarke, L. (2011). Renewable energy and climate mitigation: A large-scale scenarios review. Climate Policy, 11(4), 1131–1158.
Lenton, T. M., & Vaughan, N. E. (2009). The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 9, 5539–5561.
Lovett, R. (2010). Geoengineering won’t curb sea-level rise. Nature News. Retrieved August 23, 2010, from (http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100823/full/news.2010.426.html). doi: 10.1038/news.2010.426
Luderer, G., Bosetti, V., Jakob, M., Leimbach, M., Steckel, J., & Waisman, H. (2011). On the economics of decarbonization – Results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0105-x.
Major Economics Forum. (2009). Declaration of the leaders of the Major Economies Forum on energy and climate, MEF. http://www.g8italia2009.it/static/G8_Allegato/MEF_Declarationl.pdf
Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D. J., & Allen, M. R. (2009). Greenhouse gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 458(7242), 1158.
Moore, J. C., Jevrejevad, S., & Grinstede, A. (2010). Efficacy of geoengineering to limit 21st century sea-level rise. PNAS, 107(36), 15699–15703.
Neuhoff, K., Dröge, S., Edenhofer, O., Flachsland, C., Held, H., Ragwitz, M., Strohschein, J., Türk, A., & Michaelowa, A. (2009). Translating model results into economic policies (RECIPE Working Paper). Potsdam: PIK. www.pik-potsdam.de/recipe
Popp, A., Lotze-Campen, H., & Bodirsky, B. (2010). Food consumption, diet shifts and associated non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production. Global Environmental Change, 20, 451–462.
Popp, A., Dietrich, J. P., Lotze-Campen, H., Klein, D., Bauer, N., Krause, M., Beringer, T., Gerten, D., & Edenhofer, O. (2011). The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system. Environmental Research Letters. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/034017.
Ricke, K., Morgan, M. G., & Allen, M. R. (2010). Regional climate response to solar-radiation management. Nature Geoscience, 3, 537–541.
Robock, A., Marquardt, A., Kravitz, B., & Stenchikov, G. (2009). Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophysical Research Letters, 36. doi:10.1029/2009GL039209.
Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., van Vuuren, D. P., den Elzen, M. G. J., Eickhout, B., & Kabat, P. (2009). Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic Change, 95(1–2), 83–102. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6.
The Royal Society. (2009). Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty (RS Policy document 10/09). London: The Royal Society. From http://royalsociety.org/geoengineering-the-climate/
Tilman, D., Socolow, R., Foley, J. A., Hill, J., Larson, E., Lynd, L., Pacala, S., Reilly, J., Searchinger, T., Somerville, C., & Williams, R. (2009). Beneficial biofuels – The food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science, 325, 270–271. doi:10.1126/science.1177970.
UNFCCC. (2010, 7–18 December). Draft decision -/CP.15: Proposal by the President. Conference of the Parties, Fifteenth session, Copenhagen. Retrieved July 6, 2010, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/l07.pdf
Victor, D. G., Morgan, M. G., Apt, J., Steinbruner, J., & Ricke, K. (2009). The geoengineering option: A last resort against global warming? Foreign Affairs, published by the Council on Foreign Relations. From http://d1027732.mydomainwebhost.com/articles/articles/CFR_The_Geoengineering_Option.pdf
Wigley, T. M. L. (2006). A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization. Science, 314, 452–454. doi:10.1126/science.1131728.
Wise, M., Calvin, K., Thomson, A., Clarke, L., Bond-Lamberty, B., Sands, R., Smith, S., Janetos, A., & Edmonds, J. (2009). Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science, 324, 1183–1186. doi:10.1126/science.1168475.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knopf, B., Kowarsch, M., Edenhofer, O., Luderer, G. (2012). Climate Change Mitigation: Options, Costs and Risks. In: Edenhofer, O., Wallacher, J., Lotze-Campen, H., Reder, M., Knopf, B., Müller, J. (eds) Climate Change, Justice and Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4540-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4540-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4539-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4540-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)