Skip to main content

Systems practice: making the systems in Farming Systems Research effective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explore and unpack three issues with significant practical implications that have bedeviled the understandings and practices of those who concern themselves with FSR (Farming Systems Research) or might do so in the future. The first issue is R&D practice itself – what do we do when we do R&D… or any form of practice for that matter? Secondly what constitutes ‘systems practice’ and where does the concept ‘system’ fit in this practice? Finally, what might be involved in institutionalising systems practice as a key ingredient of systemic and adaptive governance, is explored. It is argued that at this moment in human history we need to abandon old frames and engage with re-framings that give rise to practices that are better suited to our circumstances. Only by doing this is there some prospect of making the ‘systems’ part of the historical framing of FSR a hope for the future rather than a relic of the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In using Farming Systems Research I make no claim that this terminology is the best descriptor nor that it should be conserved. My own preference is for the prime descriptor to be Systems Practice following by the domain or context descriptor e.g. systems practice – food security or systems practice – farming innovation etc.

  2. 2.

    Ackoff (2004) attributes this distinction to Peter Drucker; he relates it to the difference between reformation (changing the means of achieving an objective i.e. doing things right) and transformation (changing the objectives being pursued; i.e. doing the right thing). See http://www.phibetaiota.net/2009/10/about-doing-right-things-righter/; also http://www.pegasuscom.com/levpoints/ackoff_a-lifetime-of-systems-thinking.html

  3. 3.

    In some papers we have used RD&E, where E is for extension.

  4. 4.

    Or other forms of practice such as policy practice, evaluation practice etc.

  5. 5.

    In this chapter I draw upon Ison (2010a) which is studied as part of this course as well as material prepared in conjunction with my colleague Chris Blackmore for the course (OU code TU812) study guide.

  6. 6.

    See http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/argyris.html. Accessed 29 September 2011.

  7. 7.

    And it is a trap to think of tools and techniques as existing outside a practice and purpose dynamic.

  8. 8.

    CoS refers to a Convergence of Sciences research program.

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (2004). Transforming the systems movement. Address at IFSR, 26 May 2004, 11 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • APSC (Australian Public Service Commission). (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra: Australian Public Service Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1980). Inner contradictions of rigorous research. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armson, R. (2011). Growing wings on the way. Systems thinking for messy situations. Exeter: Triarchy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, R. J. (2007). Redesigning animal agriculture: A systemic perspective. In D. Swain, E. Charmley, J. Steel, & S. Coffey (Eds.), Redesigning animal agriculture (pp. 1–17). London: CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, C. (Ed.). (2010). Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B. (1999). Soft systems methodology: A 30 year retrospective. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., & Poulter, J. (2006). Learning for action. A short definitive account of soft systems methodology and its use for practitioners, teachers and students. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. B., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. B., & Ison, R. L. (2009a). Living with environmental change: Adaptation as social learning. Editorial, Special Edn., Environmental Policy & Governance, 19, 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. B., & Ison, R. L. (2009b). Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: Social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy & Governance, 19, 358–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, M. (Ed.). (2000). A history of Farming Systems Research. Oxon: FAO and CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., & van Woerkum, C. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62, 155–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flora, C. B. (1988). Farming systems approaches to international technical cooperation in agriculture and rural life. Agriculture and Human Values, 5, 24–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T., Leeuwis, C., Nederlof, S., Röling, N., Sakyl-Dawson, O., Traore, M., & van Huis, A. (2012). An innovation systems approach to institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa. Agricultural Systems, 108, 74–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isendahl, N., Dewulf, A., Brugnach, M., Francois, G., Mollenkamp, S., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). Assessing framing of uncertainties in water management practice. Water Resources Management, 23, 3191–3205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. L. (2008). Methodological challenges of trans-disciplinary research: Some systemic reflections. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16, 241–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. L. (2010a). Systems practice: How to act in a climate-change world. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. L. (2010b). Governance that works. Why public service reform needs systems thinking. In M. Davis & M. Lyons (Eds.), More than luck. Ideas Australia needs now (pp. 215–228). Sydney: CPD (Also at: http://morethanluck.cpd.org.au/more-than-luck/governance-that-works/).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. L., & Russell, D. B. (Eds.). (2007). Agricultural extension and rural development: Breaking out of knowledge transfer traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. L., & Russell, D. B. (2011). The worlds we create: Designing learning systems for the underworld of extension practice. In J. Jennings, R. P. Packham, & D. Woodside (Eds.), Shaping change: Natural resource management, agriculture and the role of extension (pp. 66–76). Wodonga: Australasia-Pacific Extension Network (APEN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. L., Röling, N., & Watson, D. (2007). Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: Investigating the role of social learning. Environmental Science & Policy, 10, 499–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. L., Bawden, R. D., Mackenzie, B., Packham, R. G., Sriskandarajah, N., & Armson, R. (2008). From sustainable to systemic development: An inquiry into transformations in discourse and praxis. In J. Sheffield (Ed.), Systemic development: Local solutions in a global environment (pp. 231–252). Mansfield: ISCE Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ison, R. L., Collins, K. B, Colvin, J. C, Jiggins, J. Roggero, P. P., Seddaiu, G., Steyaert, P., Toderi, M., & Zanolla, C. (2011). Sustainable catchment managing in a climate changing world: new integrative modalities for connecting policy makers, scientists and other stakeholders, Water Resources Management 25(15), 3977–3992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, S., & Smith, J. (1999). Framing and reframing in land use change conflicts. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 16(2), 164–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCown, R. L., Carberry, P. S., Hochman, Z., Dalgliesh, N. P., & Foale, M. A. (2009). Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research. Crop and Pasture Science, 60, 1017–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milly, P., Betancourt, J., Falkenmark, M., Hirsch, R., Kundzewicz, Z., Lettenmaier, D., & Stouffer, R. (2008). Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science, 319(5863), 573–574.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100, 641–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packham, R. G. (2011). The farming systems approach. In J. Jennings, R. G. Packham, & D. Woodside (Eds.), Shaping change: Natural resource management, agriculture and the role of extension (pp. 32–51). Wodonga: APEN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. J., & Ison, R. L. (1997). Agronomy of grassland systems (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramage, M., & Shipp, K. (2009). Systems thinkers. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Remenyi, J. (Ed.). (1985, May 12–15). Agricultural systems research for developing countries. In Proceedings of an International Workshop Held at Hawkesbury Agricultural College, Richmond, NSW, Australia (ACIAR Proceedings No. 11, 189 pp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M., & Holwell, S. (Eds.). (2010). Systems approaches to managing change. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, D. B., & Ison, R. L. (2007). The research-development relationship in rural communities: An opportunity for contextual science. In R. L. Ison & D. B. Russell (Eds.), Agricultural extension and rural development: Breaking out of knowledge transfer traditions (pp. 10–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyaert, P., & Jiggins, J. (2007). Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: A synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science & Policy, 10, 575–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirzaker, R., Biggs, H., Roux, D., & Cilliers, P. (2010). Requisite simplicities to help negotiate complex problems. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 39, 600–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, P., & Ison, R. L. (2011). Appreciating institutional complexity in water governance dynamics: A case from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resources Management, 25, 3977–3992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K., & Moren, G. (1990). Systems approaches for improvement in agriculture and resource management. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ray Ison .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ison, R. (2012). Systems practice: making the systems in Farming Systems Research effective. In: Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (eds) Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics