Skip to main content

How should we farm? The ethical dimension of farming systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

If Farming Systems Research is to truly embrace sustainability as the overall context of its mission, then the inclusion of ethics (and especially systemic ethics) is an imperative. There are matters of responsibilities of producers to the ecological integrity of the land that they farm as well as to the manner by which they use resources. There are matters of equity and fairness and trustworthiness to the consumers of their products, and matters of the well-being of animals under their care. There are, furthermore, particular responsibilities that farming systems researchers have to the way that they conduct their scientific inquiries and develop and promote the types of technologies that they help to generate. These issues raise questions that call upon consideration of rights and wrongs, of means as well as ends, of good and evil, and of what it is to be virtuous. These are ethical questions about what ‘should be done’ with respect to the further development of farming systems that ought to condition the answers to questions about what ‘could be done’. This chapter will discuss the significance of the moral/ethical dimensions of agriculture and farming, as well as of agricultural sciences. It will show how the implementation of the principles of sustainability ethics ‘ought to’ shape Farming Systems Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.fao.org/ethics/index-en.htm

References

  • Bawden, R. J. (1996). On the systems dimension of FSR. Journal of Farming Systems Research and Extension, 5, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, R. J. (1997) Learning to persist: A systemic view of development. In: F. A. Stowell, R. L. Ison, R. Armson, J. Holloway, S. Jackson, & S. McRobb (Eds.), Systems for sustainability: People, organizations and environments. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the UK Society for Systems Sciences, Milton Keynes (pp. 1–5). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bawden, R. J. (2007). Knowing systems and the environment. In J. Pretty, A. Ball, T. Benton, J. Guivant, D. Lee, D. Orr, M. Pfeffer, & H. Ward (Eds.), Sage handbook on environment and society (pp. 224–234). London: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new society. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (2000). The eclipse of morality: Science, state and market. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1971). The design of inquiring systems. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, G. L. (2002). Ethics. In G. L. Comstock (Ed.), Life science ethics. Ames: Iowa State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotgrove, S. (1982). Catastrophe or cornucopia. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, E. (Ed.). (2005). The shorter Routledge encyclopaedia of philosophy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cribb, J. (2010). The coming famine: The global food crises and what we can do about it. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A. (2001). Technology and the contested meanings of technology. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, G. K. (1984). The meanings of agricultural sustainability. In G. K. Douglass (Ed.), Agricultural sustainability in a changing world (pp. 3–29). Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, A., & Harris, J. (Eds.). (1994). Ethics and biotechnology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2004). The ethics of sustainable agricultural intensification. From http://www.fao.org/ethics/index-en.htm. Accessed 20 Oct 2011.

  • FAO. (Undated). Ethics in food and agriculture. From http://www.fao.org/ethics/index-en.htm. Accessed 20 Oct2011.

  • Gaspar, D. (2004). Ethics and development: From economism to human development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2007). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, disease, and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthals, M., & Borgers, R. J. (Eds.). (2004). Ethics for life sciences. Amsterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGilchrist, I. (2010). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the Western World. New Haven. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology and practice. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. (1983). The influence of personal biases on environmental problem solving. Journal of Environmental Management, 17, 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, M. (2007). Evaluation based on critical systems heuristics. In B. Williams & I. Imam (Eds.), Systems concepts in evaluation: An expert anthology (pp. 101–121). Point Reyes: EdgePress of Inverness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, M. (2004). The ethical canary. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straughan, R. R. (1995). Ethical issues of crop biotechnology. In T. B. Mepham, G. A. Tucker, & J. Wiseman (Eds.), Issues in agricultural bioethics (pp. 163–176). Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B. (1995). The spirit of the soil: Agricultural and environmental ethics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B. (1998). Agricultural ethics: Research, teaching and public policy. Ames: Iowa University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B. (2007a). Ethics on the frontiers of livestock science. In D. L. Swain, E. Charmley, J. W. Steel, & S. G. Coffey (Eds.), Redesigning animal agriculture: The challenge of the 21st century (pp. 30–35). Cambridge: CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B. (2007b). Agricultural sustainability: What it is and what it is not. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 5, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B. (Ed.). (2008). The ethics of intensification: Agricultural development and cultural change. Amsterdam: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. Bern: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1987). Critical heuristics of social system design. European Journal of Operations Research, 31, 276–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1993). Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: A plea for critical holism. Systems Practice, 6, 583–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1996). Critical systems thinking for citizens: A research proposal (Centre for Systems Studies Research Memorandum #10). Hull: University of Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A., & Bawden, R. J. (2000). Integrating sustainability into agricultural education: Dealing with complexity, uncertainty and diverging worldviews. Interuniversity conference for agricultural and related sciences in Europe (ICA). AFANet. University of Gent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal why we are the way we are: The new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimdahl, R. L. (2006). Agriculture’s ethical horizon. Amsterdam: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Bawden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bawden, R. (2012). How should we farm? The ethical dimension of farming systems. In: Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (eds) Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics