Abstract
How can the dynamics of the agro-food sector in the long run be addressed? We argue that sustainable agro-food systems cannot be developed through a simple improvement of existing systems, but will require a transition. Therefore, we focus on how transitions to sustainability could be initiated and supported, taking into account renewal initiatives at the farm level, organised projects, heterogeneous actors and differing interests. We argue that a transition will have to come from a range of novelties that initially have various misfits with an existing regime. To tackle these misfits will require a learning process that needs to be of a ‘reflexive’ nature which implies that various taken for granted characteristics of the regime and beliefs of stakeholders can be questioned. Another critical issue is that this learning not only takes place in a protected environment (or niche) but that new links with the existing regime need to be created. Only then can learning about novelties start a transformation process in the regime that may eventually lead to a transition.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Instead of the term ‘transition’, the term ‘system innovation’ is often used. The term transition highlights a difference between an earlier stage (e.g. horse-power based) and a latter stage (e.g. tractor-power based). The term system innovation highlights a process that takes place between these stages. System innovation is also used to distinguish these processes from more common, evolutionary patterns of innovation. Although various authors give somewhat different meanings to these terms, in general they are used interchangeably (e.g. Elzen et al. 2004a, b).
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
This air-traffic metaphor was chosen to depict the level of animal welfare (between Economy Class and First Class).
References
Ackrill, R. (2000). The common agricultural policy. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Albaladejo, C., & Casabianca, F. (Eds.) (1997).La recherche-action. Ambitions, pratiques, débats. Paris: INRA, Etudes et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Développement, n°30, 230 p.
Barbier, M. (2003). Une interprétation de la constitution de l’ESB comme problème public européen [BSE as an European public problem definition: An interpretation]. Revue Internationale de Politique Comparée, 10, 233–246.
Barbier, M. (2008). Water in bottles, farmers in green. The sociotechnical and managerial construction of a ‘dispositif’ for underground water quality protection. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7, 174–197.
Barbier, M. (2010). The ecologization of agricultural development and the treadmill of sustainable development, a critique in a state of transition. Przeglad Socjologiczny [Sociological Review], 59, 9–28.
Barbier, M., Cerf, M., & Maxime, F. (2004). The transformation of rationalization practices in agriculture and rural development. New direction, new issues. Paper presented at the XI World Congress of Rural Sociology, held 25-30 July 2004 in Trondheim.
Barbier, M., Cerf, M., & Barrier, J. (2005). Projects as learning agency at organization borders: A resource for organizational learning? In S. Gherardi & D. Nicolini (Eds.), The passion for learning and knowing. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Organizational Learning and Knowledge, University of Trento, Trento.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
Béguin, P., & Cerf, M. (2009). Dynamique des savoirs, dynamiques des changements [Knowledge dynamics, change dynamics]. Toulouse: Octarès Editions.
Bertrand, A., Joly, P.-B., & Marris, C. (2005). Negotiation and dialogue between academy and society: Generation of new regulation and governance conditions for a sustainable development? Ciência, Tecnologia e Sociedade: Novos Modelos de Governança (pp. 255–280). Brasília: Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos (CGEE).
Bieleman, J. (Ed.). (2000). Landbouw [Agriculture]. In: H. W. Lintsen & J. W. Schot (Eds.), Techniek in Nederland in de twintigste eeuw: Landbouw en Voeding [Technology in the Netherlands in the twentieth century: Agriculture and food] (pp. 11–233). Zutphen: Walburg Pers.
Blackler, F. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, 16, 1021–1046.
Blackmore, C., Cerf, M., Ison, R., & Paine, M. (2012). The role of action-oriented learning theories for change in agriculture and rural networks. In: I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, & B. Dedieu (Eds.), Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 159–177). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bos, A. P. (2008). Instrumentalization theory and reflexive design in animal husbandry. Social Epistemology, 22, 29–50.
Bos, A. P., & Grin, J. (2008). “Doing” reflexive modernization in pig husbandry: The hard work of changing the course of a river. Science, Technology and Human Values, 33, 480–507.
Bos, A. P., & Grin, J. (2010). Reflexive interactive design as an instrument for dual track governance. Paper prepared for the International workshop on System Innovations, Knowledge Regimes, and Design Practices towards Sustainable Agriculture, 16-18 June, in Lelystad.
Cerf, M., Guillot, M. N., & Olry, P. (2011). Acting as a change agent in supporting sustainable agriculture: How to cope with new professional situations? The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 17, 7–19.
Elzen, B., & Spoelstra, S. (2010). Towards sustainable livestock production systems: Outline of Learning and Experimentation Strategy (LES). In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium (pp. 823–834). From www.european-ifsa.org
Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (Eds.). (2004a). System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., Hoffman, P. S., & Green, K. (2004b). Socio-technical scenarios as a tool for transition policy: An example from the traffic and transport domain. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 251–281). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Elzen, B., Geels, F., Leeuwis, C., & van Mierlo, B. (2011). Normative contestation in transitions ‘in the making’: Animal welfare concerns and system innovation in pig husbandry. Research Policy, 40, 263–275.
Elzen, B., Leeuwis, C., & van Mierlo, B. (forthcoming). Anchoring of innovations: Using the greenhouse effect to save energy.
ESP. (2007). Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: A synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 575–586.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.
Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. W. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36, 399–417.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Gielen, P., & Zaalmink, W. (2003). Hoe komen gewone boeren tot verandering? [What makes ordinary farmers change?] (Report 18). Wageningen: Agro Management Tools.
Goulet, F. (2008). Des tensions épistémiques et professionnelles en agriculture – Dynamiques autour des techniques sans labour et de leur évaluation environnementale [Epistemic and professional tensions in agriculture. Dynamics around the minimum tillage techniques and their environmental assessment]. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 2, 291–310.
Grin, J. (2006). Reflexive modernization as a governance issue – Or: Designing and shaping re-structuration. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 54–81). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Grin, J. (2010). Part III: Understanding transitions from a governance perspective. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term structural change (pp. 221–319). New York: Routledge.
Grin, J. (2012). The politics of transition governance in Dutch agriculture. Conceptual understanding and implications for transition management. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15, 72–89.
Grin, J., & Loeber, A. (2007). Theories of policy learning: Agency, structure and change. In: F. Fischer, G. Miller, M. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis. Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 201–219). Boca Raton (FL), CRC Press.
Grin, J., & Van Staveren, A. (2007). Werken aan systeeminnovaties. Lessen uit de praktijk van Innovatie Netwerk [Working on system innovations. Lessons from the innovation network’s practices]. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Grin, J., & Marijnen, E. (2011). Global threats, global changes and connected communities in the agrofood system. In H. G. Brauch, Ú. Oswald Spring, C. Mesjasz, J. Grin, P. Kameri-Mbote, B. Chourou, P. Dunay, & J. Birkmann (Eds.), Coping with global environmental change, disasters and security – Threats, challenges, vulnerabilities and risks (Hexagon series on human and environmental security and peace, Vol. 5, pp. 1005–1018). Berlin: Springer.
Grin, J., Felix, F., Bos, A. P., & Spoelstra, S. (2004). Practices for reflexive design: Lessons from a Dutch programme on sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1, 126–149.
Hofman, P. S., & Elzen, B. (2010). Exploring system innovation in the electricity system through sociotechnical scenarios. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 22, 653–670.
Hoogma, R., Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Truffer, B. (2002). Experimenting with sustainable transport: The approach of strategic niche management. London: Spon Press.
Horlings, I. (1996). Duurzaam boeren met beleid. Innovatiegroepen in de Nederlandse landbouw [Skilfull sustainable farming. Innovation groups in Dutch agriculture]. Wageningen: Circle for Rural European Studies.
Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35, 715–728.
Hubert, B., Ison, R., Sriskandarajah, N., Blackmore, C., Cerf, M., Avelange, I., Barbier, M., & Steyaert, P. (2012). Learning in European agricultural and rural networks: Building a systemic research agenda. In: I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, & B. Dedieu (Eds.), Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: A new dynamic (pp. 179–200). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ingram, J. (2008). Agronomist-farmer knowledge encounters: An analysis of knowledge exchange in the context of best management practices in England. Agriculture and Human Values, 25, 405–418.
Joly, P.-B., Assouline, G., Dominique, K., Lemarié, J., Marris, C., & Roy, A. (2000). L’innovation controversée: le débat public sur les OGM en France [Controversial innovation: Public debate on GMO in France]. Grenoble: INRA, Rapport du CRIDE.
Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2008). Balancing multiple interests: Embedding innovation intermediation in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure. Technovation, 28, 364–378.
Knickel, K., & Renting, H. (2000). Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 512–528.
Lamine, C. (2011). Anticipate or stall: Environmental prescriptions, the reworking of cereal farmers’ occupational identities. Sociologie du Travail, 53, 75–92.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30, 225–248.
Laurent, C., & Remy, C. (2000). Agricultural holding: Hindsight and foresight. Etudes et Recherches sur les Systèmes Agraires et le Développement, Nouveaux regards sur l’exploitation agricole, 31, 415–430.
LEARN. (2000). Cow up a tree. Knowing and learning for change in agriculture. Case studies from industrialised countries. Paris: INRA.
LeMasson, P., Barbier, M., Caron, P., Aggeri, F. (2010). Managing generative expectations: committing designers by the dual expansion of promises and realizations. The case of “building with hemp”. Paper presented at the SISA Workshop, held 16-18 June in Lelystad.
Lemery, B. (2003). Farmers in the making of a new agriculture. Sociologie du Travail, 45, 9–25.
Loeber, A. (2003). Inbreken in het gangbare. Transitiemanagement In De Praktijk: De Nido-benadering [Intruding to break habitual patterns. Transition management in practice: The NIDO approach]. Leeuwarden: Nido.
Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. PhD dissertation, Rotterdam Erasmus University.
Marshall, D. (2001). Food availability and the European consumer. In L. Frewer, E. Risvik, & H. Schifferstein (Eds.), Food, people and society: A European perspective of consumer’s food choices (pp. 318–338). New York: Springer.
Mendras, H. (1971). The vanishing peasant. Innovation and change in French agriculture. New York: MIT Press.
Morris, C., & Winter, M. (2000). Integrated farming systems: The third way for European agriculture? Land Use Policy, 16, 193–205.
Prost, L., Béguin, P., & Cerf, M. (2010). Co-design as a distributed dialogical design. In B. Elzen & M. Barbier (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international workshop on system innovations, knowledge regimes, and design practices towards sustainable agriculture. Wageningen: WUR Editions.
Raven, R. P. (2005). Strategic niche management for biomass: A comparative study on the experimental introduction of bioenergy technologies in the Netherlands and Denmark. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). The Sage handbook of action research. London: Sage.
Renting, H., van der Ploeg, J. D., & Knickel, K. (2004). Multifunctionality in European agriculture. In F. Brouwer (Ed.), Sustaining agriculture and the rural environment: Governance, policy and multifunctionality (pp. 81–103). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change (pp. 327–399). Columbus: Battelle.
Roep, D., van der Ploeg, J. D., & Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2003). Managing technical-institutional design processes: Some strategic lessons from environmental co-operatives in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Agrarian Studies, 51, 195–217.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. Glencoe: Free Press.
Rotmans, J. (2003). Transitiemanagement, sleutel voor een duurzame samenleving [Transition management, key for a sustainable society]. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3, 15–31.
Schot, J. W. (1998). The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation: The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century. History and Technology, 14, 173–200.
Schot, J., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 537–554.
Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19, 427–450.
Steyaert P., & Jiggins J. (2007). Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice, Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 575–586.
Stirling, A. (2006). Precaution, foresight and sustainability. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 225–272). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Tracy, M. (1989). Government and agriculture in western Europe 1880–1988. New York: New York University Press.
Voß, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance: Introduction. In J.-P. Voss, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 3–28). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Voß, J. P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (Eds.). (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Weaver, P., Jansen, L., van Grootveld, G., van Spiegel, E., & Vergragt, P. (2000). Sustainable technology development. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
Wolleswinkel, A. P., Roep, D., van Calker, J., de Rooij, S. J. G., & Verhoeven, F. P. M. (2004). Atlas van innoverende melkveehouders. Veelbelovende vertrekpunten bij het verduurzamen van de melkveehouderij [Atlas of innovating dairy farmers. Promising initiatives to make dairy farming sustainable]. Wageningen: Wageningen UR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elzen, B., Barbier, M., Cerf, M., Grin, J. (2012). Stimulating transitions towards sustainable farming systems. In: Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (eds) Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4502-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4503-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)