Abstract
In Denmark, agriculture is becoming increasingly specialised, and more and more actors are becoming involved in farm decision making. These trends are more or less pronounced in other European countries as well. We therefore find that to understand modern farming systems, we have to shift the focus of analysis from individual farmers to communication and social relations. This is where Luhmann’s social systems theory can offer new insights. Firstly, it can help observe and understand the operational closure and system logic of a farming system and how this closure is produced and reproduced. Secondly, it provides a theory of functional differentiation and structural couplings that opens up for a new approach to look at sustainability by way of decoupling, recoupling and new forms of coupling.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We use the notion ‘farming system’ and not farm, for two reasons. The first is that the notion of a farm is widely associated with a well-defined physical unity of farmland, buildings, animals, machinery, family and labours, but in reality the organisation of agricultural production is much more complex. The second reason is that new forms of arrangements and organisations of agricultural production are emerging, involving new sources of capital and new forms of cooperation and coordination, which is not covered very well by the notion of a farm.
- 2.
References
Djurfeldt, G. (1996). Defining and operationalizing family farming from a sociological perspective. Sociologia Ruralis, 36, 340–351.
Gasson, R., & Errington, A. (1993). The farm family business. Wallingford: CABI.
Goodman, D., & Watts, M. (Eds.). (1997). Globalising food: Agrarian questions and global restructuring. London: Routledge.
Goodman, D., Sorj, B., & Wilkinson, J. (1987). From farming to biotechnology: A theory of agro-industrial development. Oxford: Blackwell.
Landbrug og Fødevarer. (2011). Fakta om Erhvervet 2011 [Facts on the industry 2011]. København: Axelborg.
Langvad, A. M., & Noe, E. (2006). (Re-)innovating tools for decision-support in the light of farmers’ various strategies. In H. Langeveld & N. Röling (Eds.), Changing European farming systems for a better future – New visions for rural areas (pp. 335–339). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Latour, B. (1997). Om aktør—netværksteori. Nogle få afklaringer og mere end nogle få forviklinger [On actor-network theory: A few clarifications]. Philosophia, 25, 47–64.
Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor-network theory and after (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Blackwell.
Luhmann, N. (1990). Essays on self-reference. New York: Colombia University Press.
Luhmann, N. (1991). Operational closure and structural coupling: The differentiation of the legal system. Cardozo Law Review, 1991–1992(13), 1419–1441.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press (German edition 1984).
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. (1987). Tree of knowledge: Biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publishers.
Noe, E. (1999). Værdier, Rationalitet og Landbrugsproduktion. Belyst ved en microsociologisk undersøgelse blandt danskeøkologiske og konventionelle kvægbrugere [Values, rationality and farming – Examined in a micro-sociological study of organic and conventional dairy farmers]. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Economic and Natural Resources at the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Noe, E., & Alrøe, H. F. (2003). Farm enterprises as self-organizing systems: A new transdisciplinary framework for studying farm enterprises? International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 11, 3–14.
Noe, E., & Alrøe, H. F. (2006). Combining Luhmann and actor-network theory to see farm enterprises as self-organizing systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 13, 34–48.
Noe, E., & Alrøe, H. F. (2011). Quality, coherence and co-operation: A framework for studying the mediation of qualities in food networks and collective marketing strategies. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 18, 12–27.
Noe, E., & Alrøe, H. F. (2012). Jordbrug, strukturelle koblinger og bæredygtighed [Agriculture, structural couplings and sustainability]. In M. Knudsen & G. Harste (Eds.), Systemteorien i anvendelse [Systems theory applied]. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
Noe, E., & Kristensen, T. (2003). Driftsledelsesmæssige udfordringer ved etablering af automatiske malkesystemer (AMS) i eksisterende mælkeproduktionssystemer [Farm management challenges in establishing automatic milking systems (AMS) in existing dairy production systems] (DJF Rapport, Husdyrbrug Nr. 47). Tjele: DanmarksJordbrugsForskning.
van der Ploeg, J. D. (1994). Styles of farming: An introductory note on the concepts and methodology. In J. D. van der Ploeg & A. Long (Eds.), Born from within. Practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development (pp. 7–30). Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.
von Uexküll, J. (1982). The theory of meaning. Semiotica, 42, 25–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Noe, E., Alrøe, H.F. (2012). Observing farming systems: Insights from social systems theory. In: Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (eds) Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4502-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4503-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)