Skip to main content

Farms and farmers facing change: The adaptive approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic

Abstract

In the last decades, there have been profound changes in the understanding of farming systems: farms are no longer seen as facing a stable environment, thus allowing a focus on optimising production systems. Rather, farms are conceptualised as evolving and adaptive, so as to be able to respond to an ever-changing environment. The adaptive approach in Farming Systems Research focuses on ensuring sufficient room to manoeuvre, identifying transition capabilities and extending the degrees of freedom. The concepts of resilience, diversity and flexibility help in understanding how to make constructive use of unforeseen change. Understanding farmers’ rationalities; the interactions between the farming family’s activities; diverse approaches to production management; farm trajectories, and options to increase farmers’ autonomy are central issues of research. Farmers face the triple challenge of ensuring liveability, making efficient use of their resources, and keeping their farms adaptive so as to find responses to both external and internal drivers of change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This term is a translation from the French term ‘vivable’ and has no equivalent term in English. It means ‘acceptable living conditions at work’. Some researchers distinguish between ‘working conditions’ and ‘living conditions at work’, which is more specific to the farm, which is both place of work and the homestead of the farm family.

References

  • Adger, N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ancey, V., & Ickowicz, A. (2009). La vulnérabilité pastorale au Sahel: Portée et limites des systèmes d’alerte basés sur des indicateurs [Pastoral vulnerability in Sahel: advantages and limits of alert systems based on indicators]. In L’élevage, richesse des pauvres: Stratégies d’éleveurs et organisations sociales face aux risques dans les pays du Sud (pp. 117–132). Versailles: Quae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrieu, N., Coléno, F., & Duru, M. (2008). L’organisation du système fourrager: source de flexibilité face aux variations climatiques [Organisation of the forage system as a source of flexibility in the face of weather variability]. In B. Dedieu, E. Chia, B. Leclerc, Ch Moulin, & M. Tichit (Eds.), L’élevage en mouvement. Flexibilité et adaptation des exploitations d’herbivores (pp. 97–112). Versailles: Quae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astigaraga, L., & Ingrand, S. (2011). Production flexibility in extensive beef farming systems. Ecology and Society, 16, 7. From http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art7/

  • Bellon, S., Guérin, G., & Léger, F. (2004). Anticiper les aléas climatiques en programmant des sécurités [Anticipating weather variability by programming safety]. In J. P. Duboeuf (Ed.), Evolutions of sheep and goat production systems: Future of extensive systems and changes in society (Options Méditerranéennes. Série A, n°61, pp. 137–146). Zaragoza: Ciheam/FAO/ICZS/Cirval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, A., & Krychowski, T. (1981). L’adaptabilité des exploitations laitières: essai d’ap-préciation de certaines de ses composantes, à partir de douze cas du Maine-et-Loire [Adaptability of dairy farms: Approach to understanding its components, based on twelve cases in the Maine-et-Loire]. Fourrages, 88, 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, S. (2003). Command and control in natural resource management: Revisiting Holling and Meffe. Ecological Management and Restoration, 4, 161–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (1991). Complexity, diversity and competence. Toward sustainable livelihood from farming systems in the 21st century. Journal of the Asian Farming Systems Association, 1, 79–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. (2006). Vulnerability, coping and policy. Editorial introduction. IDS Bulletin, 37, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chia, E. (2008). La flexibilité relationnelle: rôle des réseaux, groupements et associations d’éleveurs [Relational flexibility: The role of networks, groups and farmer associations]. In B. Dedieu, E. Chia, B. Leclerc, Ch Moulin, & M. Tichit (Eds.), L’élevage en mouvement. Flexibilité et adaptation des exploitations d’herbivores (pp. 137–144). Versailles: Quae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia, E., & Marchenay, M. (2008). Un regard des sciences de gestion sur la flexibilité: enjeux et perspectives [The view of management sciences on flexibility: Challenges and perspectives]. In B. Dedieu, E. Chia, B. Leclerc, Ch Moulin, & M. Tichit (Eds.), L’élevage en mouvement. Flexibilité et adaptation des exploitations d’herbivores (pp. 25–38). Versailles: Quae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdella, N., & Dedieu, B. (2010). What action logics do family livestock farmers have to maintain their activity over the long term? In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 1244–1254). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Commandeur, M. (2006). Diversity of pig farming styles: Understanding how it is structured. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54, 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cournut, S., & Chauvat, S. (2010). Work organisation in livestock farms and farm liveability: Research findings from France. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 1148–1157). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Cournut, S., & Dedieu, B. (2004). A discrete event simulation of flock dynamics: A management application to three lambings in two years. Animal Research, 53, 383–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. B. (2006). Shop class as soulcraft: An inquiry into the value of work. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, A., Nettle, R., Brightling, P., & Hibburt, C. (2010). Enhancing the liveability of farm systems: Supporting new farm and advisory practices in the Australian dairy industry. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 1109–1116). From www.ifsa-europe. org

  • Daly, H. E. (1990). Towards some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 2, 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer, I. (2010). Strategies of family farms to strengthen their resilience. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20, 212–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer, I., Bellon, S., Dedieu, B., & Milestad, R. (2010a). Adaptiveness to enhance the sustainability of farming systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 30, 545–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darnhofer, I., Fairweather, J., & Moller, H. (2010b). Assessing a farm’s sustainability: Insights from resilience thinking. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 8, 186–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedieu, B. (2009). Qualification of the adaptive capacities of livestock farming systems. Revista Brasileira de Zootechnia, 38, 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedieu, B., & Ingrand, S. (2010). Incertitude et adaptation: cadres théoriques et application à l’analyse de la dynamique des systèmes d’élevage. [Uncertainty and adaptation: Theoretical framework and consequences on livestock farming systems dynamics approaches]. INRA Production Animales, 23, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedieu, B., & Servière, G. (2011). The model of work in approaches to livestock farming systems. CIHEAM Options Méditerranéennes, Série A, 100, 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedieu, B., Chia, E., Leclerc, B., Moulin, Ch, & Tichit, M. (2008). Introduction générale [General introduction]. In B. Dedieu, E. Chia, B. Leclerc, Ch Moulin, & M. Tichit (Eds.), L’élevage en mouvement. Flexibilité et adaptation des exploitations d’herbivores (pp. 11–24). Versailles: Quae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M., Peterson, G., Bengtsson, J., Walker, B., & Norberg, J. (2003). Response diversity, ecosystem change and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 1, 488–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabricius, C., Folke, C., Cundill, G., & Schultz, L. (2007). Powerless spectators, coping actors, and adaptive co-managers: A synthesis of the role of communities in ecosystem management. Ecology and Society, 12, 29. From http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art29/

  • Fiorelli, C., Porcher, J., & Dedieu, B. (2010). Improving farm working conditions: A proposal to characterise the individual relationships to work. A case study based on French multi-job holder sheep farmers. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 1117–1128). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analysis. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Colding, J., & Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis: Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. In F. Berkes, J. Colding, & C. Folke (Eds.), Navigating social-ecological systems. Building resilience for complexity and change (pp. 352–387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström, J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15, 20. From http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/

  • Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M. (1997). Linking technology, natural resources, and the socio-economic structure of human society: A theoretical model. Advances in Human Ecology, 6, 75–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. D., & Pinchinat, A. M. (1982). Integrative agricultural systems research. In J. Servant & A. Pinchinat (Eds.), Caribbean seminar on Farming Systems Research methodology. Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe, FWI, May 4–8, 1980 (pp. 555–565). San Jose: INRA-IICA Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellec, F., & Blouet, A. (2010). Is organic farming more liveable ? A survey of dairy farmers in the East of France. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 1044–1054). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Holling, C. S. (2001). Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 4, 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., & Meffe, G. (1996). Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation Biology, 10, 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostiou, N., & Dedieu, B. (2012). A method for assessing work productivity and flexibility in livestock farms. Animal, 6, 852–862.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (2007). The political economy of a productivist agriculture: New Zealand dairy discourses. Food Policy, 32, 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiggins, J., & Röling, N. (1994). Systems thinking and participatory research and extension skills: Can these be taught in the classroom? (Occasional papers in rural extension, No. 10). Guelph: Department of Rural Extension Studies, University of Guelph.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiggins, J., & Röling, N. (2000). Adaptive management: Potential and limitations for ecological governance. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 1, 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling-Eveillard, F., Chauvat, S., Dedieu, B., Servière, G., & Sabatté, S. (2010). The “work on livestock farms” network (WLFN): Building a new domain of learning and intervention. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 1158–1168). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Kummer, S., Leitgeb, F., & Vogl, C. R. (2008). Changes as triggers and as results of farmers’ experiments: Examples of organic farmers in Austria. In Proceedings of the 8th European IFSA Symposia, Clermont Ferrand, France (pp. 413–422). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Kummer, S., Aigelsperger, L., Milestad, R., Chowdhury, A., & Vogl, C. R. (2010). Knowledge systems, innovations and social learning in organic farming – An overview. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 664–669). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Lamine, C., & Bellon, S. (2009). Conversion to organic farming: A multidimensional research object at the crossroads of agricultural and social sciences. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 97–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauri, P. E., Costes, E., Regnard, J. L., Brun, L., Simon, S., Monney, P., & Sinoquet, H. (2008). Does knowledge on fruit tree architecture and its implications for orchard management im-prove horticultural sustainability? An overview of recent advances in the apple production. Paper presented at the first symposium on horticulture in Europe (SHE), 17–20 February, Vienna, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. (1999). Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology, 3, 3. From http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol3/iss2/art3/

  • Lemery, B. (2003). Les agriculteurs dans la fabrique d’une nouvelle agriculture [Farmers’ professional identities build a new agriculture]. Sociologie du Travail, 45, 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemery, B., Ingrand, S., Dedieu, B., & Degrange, B. (2005). Agir en situation d’incertitude: le cas des éleveurs bovins allaitants [Acting in situations of uncertainty: The case of dairy farmers]. Economie Rurale, 288, 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemery, B., Ingrand, S., Dedieu, B., & Degrange, B. (2008). La flexibilité des élevages allaitants face aux aléas de production et aux incertitudes de la filière [Flexibility of beef cattle farms in the face of uncertainties in production and marketing]. In B. Dedieu, E. Chia, B. Leclerc, Ch Moulin, & M. Tichit (Eds.), L’élevage en mouvement. Flexibilité et adaptation des exploitations d’herbivores (pp. 143–159). Versailles: Quae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev, L., & Campbell, D. (1987). The temporal dimension in Farming Systems Research: The importance of maintaining flexibility under conditions of uncertainty. Journal of Rural Studies, 3, 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levrouw, F., Morales, H., Arbeletche, P., Malaquin, I., Tourrand, J.-F., & Dedieu, B. (2007). Estrategias de largo plazo de los ganaderos uruguayos en situationces de incertitumbre. Agrociencia, 11, 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Ridaura, S., van Keulen, H., van Ittersum, M., & Leffelaar, P. A. (2005). Multiscale methodological framework to derive criteria and indicators for sustainability evaluation of peasant natural resource management systems. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 7, 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macombe, C., Madelrieux, S., Dedieu, B., & Langeveld, H. (2010). Family farming under pressure: Reassessing options for liveability and permanence. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 992–993). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Madelrieux, S., Dedieu, B., Dobremez, L., & Girard, N. (2009). Patterns of work organisation in livestock farms: The ATELAGE approach. Livestock Science, 121, 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak, S. (2001). Continued innovation in a Cambodian rice-based farming system: Farmer testing and recombination of new elements. Agricultural Systems, 69, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G., Hossard, L., Theau, J. P., Therond, O., Josien, E., Cruz, P., Rellier, J. P., Martin-Clouaire, R., & Duru, M. (2009). Characterizing potential flexibility in grassland use – Application to the French Aubrac area. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milestad, R., & Darnhofer, I. (2003). Building farm resilience: The prospects and challenges of organic farming. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 22, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milestad, R., Westberg, L., Geber, U., & Björklund, J. (2010). Enhancing adaptive capacity in food systems: Learning at farmers’ markets. Ecology and Society, 15, 29. From http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art29/

  • Milestad, R., Ahnström, J., & Björklund, J. (2011). Essential multiple functions of farms in rural communities and landscapes. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 26, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, C. H., Ingrand, S., Lasseur, J., Madelrieux, S., Napoléone, M., Pluvinage, J., & Thé-nard, V. (2008). Comprendre et analyser les changements d’organisation et de conduite de l’élevage dans un ensemble d’exploitations: propositions méthodologiques [Understanding and analysing changes in organisation and animal husbandry practices in a group of farms: Methodological propositions]. In B. Dedieu, E. Chia, B. Leclerc, Ch Moulin, & M. Tichit (Eds.), L’élevage en mouvement. Flexibilité et adaptation des exploitations d’herbivores (pp. 183–198). Versailles: Quae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicourt, C., & Cabaret, J. (2010). Création de normes, innovation sanitaire et éthique des éleveurs ovin bio [Creating norms, sanitary innovations and ethics of organic sheep farmers]. In P. Beguin, B. Dedieu, & E. Sabourin (Eds.), Le travail en agriculture: son organisation et ses valeurs face à l’innovation. Paris: L’harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. W. (2002). The farming systems approach: A historical perspective. Presentation held at the 17th symposium of the International Farming Systems Association, 17–20 November, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papy, F., Attonaty, J. M., Laporte, C., & Soler, L. G. (1988). Work organization simulation as a basis for farm management advice (equipment and manpower, levels against climatic variability). Agricultural Systems, 27, 295–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, E. (1997). The theory of the growth of the firm. In N. Foss (Ed.), Resources, firms and strategies. A reader in the resource-based perspective (pp. 27–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, M. (1978). The farm household complex as an adaptive system (Arbeitsbericht 78/1, pp. 57–70). Kiel: Institut für Landwirtschaftliche Betriebs- und Arbeitslehre, University of Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit, C., Bressoud, F., & Aubry, C. (2010). The effects of transition towards short supply chains on liveability of farming systems: Initial findings and further research needs. In Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium, Vienna, Austria (pp. 1138–1147). From www.ifsa-europe.org

  • Porcher, J. (2002). Eleveurs et animaux: réinventer le lien [Farmers and animals: Reinventing the link]. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammel, C. (2003). Sustainable development and innovations: Lessons from the Red Queen. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 6, 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammel, C., & Staudinger, M. (2002). Evolution, variability and sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 9, 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammel, C., & van den Bergh, J. (2003). Evolutionary policies for sustainable development: Adaptive flexibility and risk minimising. Ecological Economics, 47, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathe, K., & Witt, U. (2001). The nature of the firm – Static versus developmental interpretations. Journal of Management and Governance, 5, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reix, R. (1979). La flexibilité de l’entreprise [The flexibility of the firm]. Paris: Editions Cujas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D., Howlett, D., & Woodhouse, P. (2000). Sustainability indicators for natural resource management and policy. A review of indicators of agricultural and rural livelihood sustainability (Working Paper 1). Manchester: IDPM, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggero, P. P., Bellon, S., & Rosales, M. (1996). Sustainable feeding systems based on the use of local resources. Annales de Zootechnie, 45(Suppl. 1), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N., & Wagemakers, M. A. (1998). A new practice: Facilitating sustainable agriculture. In N. Röling & M. A. Wagermakers (Eds.), Facilitating sustainable agriculture. Participatory learning and adaptive management in times of environmental uncertainty (pp. 3–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvant, D., & Martin, O. (Eds.). (2010). Rusticité, flexibilité, plasticité… les nouveaux critères de qualité des animaux et des systèmes d’élevage: définitions systémique et biologique des différents concepts [Rusticity, flexibility, plasticity… the new quality criteria of animals and animal husbandry systems] (INRA Production Animales, Vol. 23). Paris: INRA and Quæ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones, I., & Thompson, J. (Eds.). (1994). Beyond farmer first: Rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebillotte, M. (1990). Some concepts for analysing farming and cropping systems and their different effects. In A. Scaife (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st ESA Congress, 5–7 December, Paris (Session 5, pp. 1–16). Colmar: ESA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundkvist, Å., Milestad, R., & Jansson, A. M. (2005). On the importance of tightening feedback loops for sustainable development of food systems. Food Policy, 30, 224–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarondeau, J.-C. (1999). Approches et formes de flexibilité [Approaches and forms of flexibility]. Revue Française de Gestion, 123, 66–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tichit, M., Puillet, L., Sabatier, R., & Teillard, P. (2011). Multicriteria performance and sustainability in livestock farming systems: Functional diversity matters. Livestock Science, 139, 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking. Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and trans-formability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9, 5. From http://wwwecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/

  • Walker, B., Gunderson, L., Kinzig, A., Folke, C., Carpenter, S., & Schultz, L. (2006). A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11, 13. From www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art13/

  • Westley, F. (2002). The devil in the dynamics: Adaptive management on the front lines. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 333–360). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecka Milestad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Milestad, R., Dedieu, B., Darnhofer, I., Bellon, S. (2012). Farms and farmers facing change: The adaptive approach. In: Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (eds) Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics