Skip to main content

Leadership and Negotiation for Project Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3704 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter deals with two main subjects which are dealt in two parts (a) Part one, Project Manager qualities or competencies and (b) Part two, Negotiations and contracting. The first one relates with leadership, that is the ability to manage the most important assets a company has, people.

The second deals with the negotiation as part of the task that any project manager will face as a professional. It starts by defining key concepts that will be used to explain the negotiation process. Further, it examines the process structure analysing main characteristics and depicting those elements that will define the final deal. Finally an example is provided where different aspects of the negotiation process are shown. The goal is to give the reader some key elements that define the negotiation process in projects as a social activity, and to show the many different paths the process can follow without pretending to indicate a single and correct model of negotiation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The concepts of BATNA and ZOPA directly emanate from Game Theory. In fact these minimum payoffs define the disagreement point, an equivalent of the non-cooperative Nash equilibrium concept (Raiffa et al. 2002).

  2. 2.

    A more thorough explanation of this picture can be found in Murtoaro et al. (2005).

References

  • Barry, T. Top 10 qualities of a project manager. http://www.projectsmart.co.uk/top-10-qualities-project-manager.html. Accessed 29 June 2011.

  • Bennis, W. (1997). Learning to lead. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Mannix, E., & Okumura, T. (2003). The importance of who you meet: Effects of self- versus other-concerns among negotiators in the United States, the People’s Republic of China, and Japan. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39, 1–15.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Mazet, F., & Salle, R. (1994). From competitive tendering to strategic marketing: An inductive approach to theory building. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 2, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cova, B., Ghauri, P., & Salle, R. (2002). Project marketing: Beyond competitive bidding. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremenyuk, V. (1993). A pluralistic viewpoint. In Z. Rubin & G. Faure (Eds.), Culture and negotiation. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Femina, D. (2002). How do we know what we know? Tacit knowledge defined. http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/biology/b103/f02/web2/dlafemina.html. Accessed 20 June 2011.

  • Lax, D., & Sebenius, J. (2006). 3D-negotiation: Powerful tools to change the game in your most important deals. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. (1992). Negotiating strategically. In A. Cohen (Ed.), The portable MBA in management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., & Minton, J. (1999). Negotiation (Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • March, R., & Wu, S. (2006). The Chinese negotiator: How to succeed in the world’s largest market. Tokyo: Kodansha International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtoaro, J., Kujala, J., & Artto, K. (2005). Negotiations in project sales and delivery process. An application of negotiation analysis. Technical paper, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., & Metcalfe, D. (2002). Negotiation analysis: The science and art of collaborative decision-making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J., & Brown, B. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebenius, J. (1992). Negotiation analysis: A characterization and review. Management Science, 38(1), 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seroka, M. (2005). The 42 month war. Bayou Steel and the USWA’s coordinating campaign. Ms thesis, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell, G. (2006). Bargaining for advantage: Negotiation strategies for reasonable people. New York: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster. (2005). Dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com/. Visited on 25 July 2011.

  • Young, H. (1991). Negotiation analysis. In H. Young (Ed.), Negotiation analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zartman, W. (2002). Power and Negotiation- University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nolberto Munier .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munier, N., Jiménez-Sáez, F. (2013). Leadership and Negotiation for Project Management. In: Project Management for Environmental, Construction and Manufacturing Engineers. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4476-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics