Abstract
Assessing mathematical literacy—as PISA does—claims for comprehensive views of the domain tested. Since mathematics is not a homogenous body of knowledge one needs inner structures of that domain in order to be able to interpret the data gained. There are several possibilities, e.g. to differentiate between the main content strands as geometry, algebra etc. However the German PISA options differentiated according to cognitive activities connected with mathematics. These activities contain the performance of procedures as well as conceptual thinking, in both intra- and extra-mathematical situations. This paper exhibits the basis of that framework, i.e. a model for mathematical tasks, and shows evidences and findings from that approach, as the cognitive balances of several tests, and the striking cognitive profiles we found in different parts of the country.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The overemphasis of technical tasks is increasingly emerging (see Neubrand, 2002, for TIMSS) to be a characteristic of German mathematics classes Analyses conducted in the context of a representative study of mathematics teachers’ professional knowledge, the COACTIV study (Baumert et al., 2010), revealed that up to 90% of the tasks set in high-stakes classroom tests are of the technical type (Jordan et al., 2008).
- 2.
As a similar pattern of findings emerged for some analogous sub-competencies in the PISA science test (Rost, Carstensen, Bieber, Prenzel, & Neubrand, 2003), these data can usefully inform discussion of curricula and their implementation. Note that boys’ and girls’ performance on the three types of mathematical activities also differed (Neubrand & Neubrand, 2004).
References
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., et al. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
Blum, W., Drüke-Noe, C., Hartung, R., & Köller, O. (Eds.). (2006). Bildungsstandards Mathematik: konkret. Sekundarstufe I: Aufgabenbeispiele, Unterrichtsanregungen, Fortbildungsideen [Educational standards for mathematics at lower secondary level: Sample tasks, suggestions for lessons, ideas for continuing education]. Berlin, Germany: Cornelsen.
Blum, W., Galbraith, P. L., Henn, H.-W., & Niss, M. (Eds.). (2007). Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Blum, W., vom Hofe, R., Jordan, A., & Kleine, M. (2004). Grundvorstellungen als aufgabenanalytisches und diagnostisches Instrument bei PISA [Basic mathematical concepts (‚Grundvorstellungen‘) as a diagnostic and analytic instrument in PISA]. In M. Neubrand (Ed.), Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 (pp. 145–158). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Cohors-Fresenborg, E., Sjuts, J., & Sommer, N. (2004). Komplexität von Denkvorgängen und Formalisierung von Wissen [Complexity of thought processes and formalization of knowledge]. In M. Neubrand (Ed.), Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 (pp. 109–144). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Hiebert, J. (Ed.). (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jordan, A., Krauss, S., Löwen, K., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., Brunner, M., et al. (2008). Aufgaben im COACTIV-Projekt: Zeugnisse des kognitiven Aktivierungspotentials im deutschen Mathematikunterricht [Tasks in the COACTIV project: Evidence of the potential for cognitive activation in German mathematics instruction]. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 29(2), 83–107.
Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 101–116.
Klieme, E., Neubrand, M., & Lüdtke, O. (2001). Mathematische Grundbildung: Testkonzeption und Ergebnisse [Mathematical literacy: Test conception and results]. In J. Baumert, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, P. Stanat, K.-J. Tillmann, & M. Weiß (Eds.), PISA 2000. Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 139–190). Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
Neubrand, J. (2002). Eine Klassifikation mathematischer Aufgaben zur Analyse von Unterrichtssituationen: Schülerarbeitsphasen und Selbsttätigkeit in den Stunden der TIMSS-Video-Studie [A classification of mathematics tasks for the analysis of instructional situations: Phases of independent student work in the TIMSS Video Study lessons]. Berlin/Hildesheim, Germany: Franzbecker.
Neubrand, M. (Ed.). (2004). Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 [Mathematical competencies of students in Germany: In-depth analyses in the context of PISA 2000]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Neubrand, J. (2006). The TIMSS 1995 and 1999 video studies. In F. K. S. Leung, K.-D. Graf, & F. J. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West: The 13th ICMI Study (pp. 291–318). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Neubrand, M., Biehler, R., Blum, W., Cohors-Fresenborg, E., Flade, L., Knoche, N., et al. (2001). Grundlagen der Ergänzung des internationalen PISA-Mathematik-Tests in der deutschen Zusatzerhebung [Framework for the supplementation of the international PISA mathematics test in the German national PISA extension study]. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 33(2), 33–45.
Neubrand, M., Klieme, E., Lüdtke, O., & Neubrand, J. (2002). Kompetenzstufen und Schwierigkeitsmodelle für den PISA-Test zur mathematischen Grundbildung [Proficiency levels and difficulty models for the PISA test of mathematical literacy]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 30(2), 100–119.
Neubrand, J., & Neubrand, M. (2003). Profiles of mathematical achievement in the PISA 2000 mathematics test and the different structure of achievement in Japan and Germany. Paper presented at the AERA 2003 Annual Meeting, Chicago.
Neubrand, J., & Neubrand, M. (2004). Innere Strukturen mathematischer Leistung im PISA 2000 Test [Internal structures of mathematics achievement in the PISA 2000 test]. In M. Neubrand (Ed.), Mathematische Kompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern in Deutschland: Vertiefende Analysen im Rahmen von PISA 2000 (pp. 87–108). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
OECD. (1999). Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris, France: OECD.
OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life: First results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: OECD.
Rost, J., Carstensen, C., Bieber, G., Prenzel, M., & Neubrand, M. (2003). Naturwissenschaftliche Teilkompetenzen im Ländervergleich [Aspects of science literacy in German cross-state comparison]. In J. Baumert, C. Artelt, E. Klieme, M. Neubrand, M. Prenzel, U. Schiefele, W. Schneider, K.-J. Tillmann, & M. Weiß (Eds.), PISA 2000: Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 109–128). Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
vom Hofe, R., Kleine, M., Blum, W., & Pekrun, R. (2005). On the role of “Grundvorstellungen” for the development of mathematical literacy: First results of the longitudinal study PALMA. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 4, 67–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neubrand, M. (2013). PISA Mathematics in Germany: Extending the Conceptual Framework to Enable a More Differentiated Assessment. In: Prenzel, M., Kobarg, M., Schöps, K., Rönnebeck, S. (eds) Research on PISA. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4458-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4458-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4457-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4458-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)