Skip to main content

Evolution and Logic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Epistemology versus Ontology

Part of the book series: Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science ((LEUS,volume 27))

Abstract

Hume’s analysis of causality opens up for an Darwinistic understanding of causality. It is argued that basic logic can be given a similar analysis as causality and hence also can be seen as a result of biological evolution. Philosophically, there is a close connection to Kant’s forms of intuition.

There is more wisdom in your body than in your deepest philosophy.

Nietzsche

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • The texts by Aristotle, Hume, and Kant are available from the internet at The Online Books Page. http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/.

  • Brouwer, L. 1912. Intuitionism and formalism. In L.E.J. Brouwer collected works, ed. A. Heyting, 123–138. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.T. 1974. Evolutionary epistemology. In The philosophy of Karl Popper, ed. P. Schlipp, 413–463. Illinois: La Salle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, A. 1915. The collected papers of Albert Einstein, volume 8: the Berlin years: correspondence, 1914–1918. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. 1884. The foundations of arithmetic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953. Translated by J.L. Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, W. B. 1972. David Hume and Charles Darwin. Journal of the History of Ideas 33(3): 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. 1941. Kants lehre vom apriorischen im lichte gegenwärtiger biologie. Blätter für Deutsche Philosophie 15: 94–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. 1973. Behind the mirror. Mariner Books, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, P. 1994. Analytic and synthetic judgements in type theory. In Kant and contemporary epistemology, ed. P. Parrini, 87–99. Dordrecht/Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. 1905. The value of science. New York: Dover, 1958. Translated by George Bruce Halsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. 1986. Taking Darwin seriously, 2nd. ed. Prometheus books, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1903. The principles of mathematics. Merchant Books, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 1998. Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan M. Smith .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, J.M. (2012). Evolution and Logic. In: Dybjer, P., Lindström, S., Palmgren, E., Sundholm, G. (eds) Epistemology versus Ontology. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4435-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics