Abstract
Community development constitutes the main arena where occupational justice may unfold on a larger scale. In this chapter, I develop the idea that true community development is still rarely mentioned in the fields of occupational therapy and occupational science. Building on the familiar concepts of occupation, client-centeredness, social justice and meaning, I discuss the concept of community development as a realm where the client is plural; yet the methods and principles so fundamental to occupational therapy and occupational science remain unchanged in response to this realm. Among the key steps to address the issue are the explicit recognition and sharing of power in its many forms, a careful analysis of local dynamics and contexts, and a thorough examination of one’s values and motives. All these steps inform an occupational process that spans the continuum, from needs assessments and mobilization to community monitoring and maintenance. The ideal result is carefully selected occupations fostering dignity, growth, self-discovery, solidarity, leadership building, and collective inquiry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Barrett, H. R. (1997). Women, occupation and health in rural Africa: Adaptation to a changing socioeconomic climate. Journal of Occupational Science: Australia, 4, 5–16.
Carr, M., & Hartl, M. (2010). Lightening the load. London: International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)/Practical Action Publishing Ltd.
Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Critical perspectives on occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). London: Wiley.
Fisher, G. (2008). A model of occupational empowerment for marginalized populations in community environments. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 22, 55–71.
Kronenberg, F., & Pollard, N. (2005). Overcoming occupational apartheid: A preliminary exploration of the political nature of occupational therapy. In F. Kronenberg, S. Algado, & N. Pollard (Eds.), Occupational therapy without borders: Learning from the spirit of survivors (pp. 58–86). Edinburgh: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone.
Polatajko, H. J., Milke, D., Baptiste, S., Doble, S., Caron-Santha, J., Kirsh, B., et al. (2007). Occupational science: Imperatives for occupational therapy. In E. Townsend & H. Polatajko (Eds.), Enabling occupation 2007 (pp. 63–86). Ottawa: CAOT Publication ACE.
Remen, R. N. (2000). My grandfather’s blessings. New York: Rivermead Books.
SAS² website. (2011). From community-based research, organizational learning, project planning and evaluation to public engagement. Accessed 4 Aug 2011 at http://www.sas2.net/
Townsend, E., & Wilcock, A. (2004). Occupational justice and client-centered practice: A dialogue in progress. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 75–87.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thibeault, R. (2013). Occupational Justice’s Intents and Impacts: From Personal Choices to Community Consequences. In: Cutchin, M., Dickie, V. (eds) Transactional Perspectives on Occupation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4429-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4429-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4428-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4429-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)