Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critical Discourse Analysis: Adding a Political Dimension to Inquiry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transactional Perspectives on Occupation

Abstract

Within this chapter, which emphasizes a critical approach to discourse analysis, discourses are conceptualized as a form of social action that shapes how phenomena are understood within particular socio-historical contexts. In addition, I forward critical discourse analysis (CDA) as a methodological approach that can be taken up to add a genealogical dimension to work based in a transactional perspective. Through fostering a critical stance about taken-for-granted assumptions regarding what occupations are ideal, possible, and healthy for whom within particular contexts, CDA can contribute to work based in a transactional perspective by raising awareness of how possibilities for action are constructed within a particular situation and the ways in which such possibilities are constructed differentially for varying actors. I delineate key epistemological and methodological aspects of CDA, and use examples of CDA work relevant to the study of occupation to illustrate its potential contributions to occupational science. These illustrations, which emphasize how CDA work fosters a critical stance towards the “way things are,” show the vital contributions that can be made through such work that aims to open up spaces for different ways of researching, addressing, and enacting occupation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainsworth, S., & Hardy, C. (2004a). Critical discourse analysis and identity: Why bother? Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), 225–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, S., & Hardy, C. (2004b). Discourse and identities. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 153–174). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ballinger, C., & Cheek, J. (2006). Discourse analysis in action: The construction of risk in a community day hospital. In L. Finlay & C. Ballinger (Eds.) Qualitative research for allied health professionals: Challenging choices, (pp. 200–217). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C., & Suto, M. (2008). Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapists: A practical guide. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, J. (2004). At the margins? Discourse analysis and qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 1140–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutchin, M. P., & Dickie, V. A. (2012). Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In G. Whiteford & C. Hocking (Eds.), Critical perspectives on occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation (pp. 23–37). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 87–121). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). In L. D. Kritzman, L. D. Kritzman, & L. D. Kritzman (Eds.), Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writing 1977–1984. New York: Routledge/Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, G., & Polkinghorne, D. (2010). Qualitative research in occupational therapy: From the first to the second generation. OTJR: Occupation, participation and health, 30(2), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Whitehouse, P. (2010). Dementia and mild cognitive impairment in social and cultural context. In D. Dannefer & C. Phillipson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social gerontology (pp. 343–356). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizational discourse: Exploring the field. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 1–36). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. C. Heller et al. (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism (pp. 222–236). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., & Phillips, N. (2004). Discourse and power. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 299–316). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jager, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 87–121). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, S. (2000). Busy bodies: Activity, aging and the management of everyday life. Journal of Aging Studies, 14, 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, G., & Wickham, G. (2003). Using Foucault’s methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. (2005). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In M. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 303–342). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronenberg, F., & Pollard, N. (2006). Political dimensions of occupation and the roles of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 617–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labonte, R., Polanyi, M., Muhajarine, N., McIntosh, T., & Williams, A. (2005). Beyond the divides. Towards critical population health research. Critical Public Health, 15(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte Rudman, D. (2006). ‘Positive aging’ and its implications for occupational possibilities in later life. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(3), 188–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte Rudman, D. (2010). Occupational possibilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 17, 55–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laliberte Rudman, D., & Molke, D. (2009). Forever productive: The discursive shaping of later life workers in contemporary Canadian media. Work, 32, 377–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 33–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laws, G. (1996). ‘A shot of economic adrenalin’: Reconstructing ‘the elderly’ in the retiree-based economic development literature. Journal of Aging Studies, 10, 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Macdonald, D. (2010). ‘Are they just checking our obesity or what?’: The healthism discourse and rural young women. Sport, Education and Society, 15, 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachen, E., Polzer, J., & Clarke, J. (2008). ‘You are free to set your own hours’: Governing worker productivity and health through flexibility and resilience. Social Science & Medicine, 66, 1019–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. (2009). A discourse analysis of Australian local government recreation and sport plans provision for people with disabilities. Public Management Review, 11, 477–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D. K. (2004). Discourse, power and ideology: Unpacking the critical approach. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 237–258). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. Beyond attitudes and behavior. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. L., Biggs, S. (2003). Foucauldian gerontology: A methodology for understanding aging. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7(2). http://www.sociology.org/content/vol7.2/03_powell_biggs.html. Accessed 4 Aug 2006.

  • Sayer, A. (2009). Who’s afraid of critical social science? Current Sociology, 57(6), 767–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. L. (2007). Critical discourse analysis for nursing research. Nursing Inquiry, 14(1), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuhr, J. J. (2003). Pragmatism, postmodernism and the future of philosophy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, T. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 62–86). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 1–33). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Occupational Therapy, and Occupational Science Field, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences Graduate Program, Western University, London, ON, Canada

    Debbie Laliberte Rudman

Authors
  1. Debbie Laliberte Rudman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debbie Laliberte Rudman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Div Occupational Health, Dept Allied Hea, University of North Carolina at Chapel H, Bondurant Hall 2050, Chapel Hill, 27599-7122, USA

    Malcolm P. Cutchin

  2. , Div Occupational Health, Dept Allied Hea, University of North Carolina at Chapel H, Bondurant Hall 2050, Chapel Hill, 27599-7122, USA

    Virginia A. Dickie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rudman, D.L. (2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: Adding a Political Dimension to Inquiry. In: Cutchin, M., Dickie, V. (eds) Transactional Perspectives on Occupation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4429-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation