Abstract
Studying occupation from a transactional perspective calls for a focus on the relationships that constitute the situation of occupation. In this chapter we discuss the fit of ethnographic processes and the transactional perspective. We propose that the ethnographic study of occupation reveals its transactional nature by exposing influences, relationships, and occupations that make up a study situation. We argue that ethnographers and participants play an active role in data collection and that their transactions generate a co-created ethnographic product grounded in the relationship. Moreover, the scope of ethnography goes beyond the interpersonal elements of a relational situation to examine other factors such as place, objects, environmental features, traditions, history, politics, and economics. The relationships joining these elements, occupations, and humans are significant components of a study situation addressed by ethnographies. The chapter is grounded in our research experiences on occupation with ethnographic methods. Examples from our research illustrate the transactional nature of studying occupation through ethnography.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agar, M. H. (1980). The professional stranger: An informal introduction the ethnography. San Diego: Academic.
Agar, M. H. (2002). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: HarperCollins.
Aldrich, R. (2008). From complexity theory to transactionalism: Moving occupational science forward in theorizing the complexities of behavior. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 147–156.
Aldrich, R. (2011). Discouraged workers’ daily occupations: Exploring complex transactions in the experience of unemployment. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Aldrich, R., & Callanan, Y. (2011). “We disappear off the planet”: Insights about studying discouraged workers. Journal of Occupational Science, 18, 153–166.
Bailliard, A. (2011). An ethnographic exploration of Latino Immigration to Smalltown, NC: Transformations in El Nuevo South. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Behar, R. (1996). The vulnerable observer: Anthropology that breaks your heart. Boston: Beacon.
Cutchin, M. P., Aldrich, R. M., Bailliard, A. L., & Coppola, S. (2008). Action theories for occupational science: The contributions of Dewey and Bourdieu. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(3), 157–165.
Dewey, J. (2000). Experience and nature. New York: Dover (Original work published in 1925).
Dewey, J. (2005). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation between knowledge and action. Whitefish: Kessinger (Original work published in 1929).
Dickie, V. (1998). Households, multiple livelihoods, and the informal economy: A study of American crafters. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 5, 109–118.
Dickie, V. (2003). The role of learning in quilt making. Journal of Occupational Science, 10, 120–129.
Dickie, V. (2010). Are occupations ‘processes too complicated to explain’? What we can learn from trying. Journal of Occupational Science, 17, 195–203.
Dickie, V., Cutchin, M., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as transactional experience: A critique of individualism in occupational science. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 83–93.
Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional “trans-action”: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, & Activity, 8(4), 275–296.
Garrison, J., & Watson, B. W. (2005). Food from thought. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 19(4), 242–256.
Hickman, L. A. (1998). Reading Dewey: Interpretations for a postmodern generation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Research, 33(7), 14–26.
Lassiter, L. E. (2005). The Chicago guide to collaborative ethnography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Marcus, G. E. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Marcus, G. E., & Fischer, M. M. J. (1986). Anthropology as culture critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pappas, G. F. (2008). John Dewey’s ethics: Democracy as experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Schwandt, T. (2007). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Whyte, W. F. (1984). Learning from the field: A guide from experience. Newbury Park: Sage.
Wolcott, H. F. (1995). The art of fieldwork. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bailliard, A.L., Aldrich, R.M., Dickie, V.A. (2013). Ethnography and the Transactional Study of Occupation. In: Cutchin, M., Dickie, V. (eds) Transactional Perspectives on Occupation. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4429-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4429-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4428-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4429-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)