Skip to main content

Green Growth Index and Policy Feedback

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Green Growth: Managing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy

Part of the book series: Greening of Industry Networks Studies ((GINS,volume 1))

  • 1814 Accesses

Abstract

Using a system dynamics model, we compute the realized environmental investment rate. Using this rate as the weight, the green welfare index is computed from the consumption index and environmental services index. The environmental investment rate that maximizes the present value of the future stream of green welfare indices is estimated and called the optimal environmental investment rate. The normalized gap between these two rates is called ‘green growth gap,’ which gauges the deviation of the economy from the dynamically optimal path. The Green Growth Index is also developed to express this concept in a more digestible manner. These concepts and index are expected to be useful in the performance assessment of the national green growth strategy. This chapter provides a system dynamics model that can serve as a basis for measurement and policy feedback for green growth as a national strategy of Korea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Chung (2008).

  2. 2.

    The Four Major River restoration Project is a multi-purpose project being concurrently implemented in Han, Nakdong, Geum and Youngsan Rivers. This project was initiated as part of the Green New Deal Policy of the Korean government and its estimated total cost is 22.2 trillion won, approximately 17.3 billion USD. For more information see Han et al. (2011).

  3. 3.

    For this line of discussions, refer to Gerlagh and Keyzer (2003), Gerlagh and van der Zwaan (2003), and Goulder and Schneider (1999). Also refer to Cho and Na (2004) for a discussion in the Korean context.

  4. 4.

    The dynamic policy index (GDPI) is combined with green welfare index (GWPI) to compute green growth index. More detail is explained in Sect. 3.4.

  5. 5.

    Green welfare considers both GDP and environmental service together. GWI is the measurement for green welfare.

  6. 6.

    For the complete equations of the model, see the Appendix.

  7. 7.

    Environmental activity means the whole environment related activities, which includes environmental augmentation (Env_Augmentation_expenditure), environmental R&D (Environmental_R&D)and capital formation (Capital_formation).

  8. 8.

    For more detail see Han et al. (2009).

  9. 9.

    “Institutions” may include regulation, emission trading, carbon tax, or national GHG reduction target setting, etc.

References

  • Cho, K.-Y., & Na, I. (2004). GHG mitigation policies and technological innovation. Korea Economic Review, 51(3), 263–294 (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, R. K. (2008). Green growth: Opportunities for bioenergy development in Asia and the Pacific, ppt presentation file, UNESCAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlagh, R., & Keyzer, M. A. (2003). Efficiency of conservationist measures: An optimist viewpoint. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46, 310–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlagh, R., & van der Zwaan, B. (2003). Gross world product and consumption in a global warming model with endogenous technological change. Resource and Energy Economics, 25, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulder, L. H., & Schneider, S. H. (1999). Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies. Resource and Energy Economics, 21, 211–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, T.-W., Kim, G.-S., & Lim, D. (2009). Development of green growth index for the effective implementation of green growth strategy. GwaCheon: Ministry of Environment. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, T.-W., Lim, D., & Lee, C.-H. (2011). Green growth: Climate change (Green forum 2010, Vol. 3). Seoul: NRCS/Random House Korea.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2007). Overview of Republic of Korea’s National Strategy for green growth, prepared by the United Nations Environment Programme, as part of its Green Economy Initiative. Geneva: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taek-Whan Han .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Stella Equations

Appendix: Stella Equations

accu_consmp(t) = accu_consmp(t - dt) + (consmp_flow) * dt

INIT accu_consmp = consmp_flow

INFLOWS:

consmp_flow = consumption/(discount_rate)^year

accu_env_svcs(t) = accu_env_svcs(t - dt) + (flow_env_svcs) * dt

INIT accu_env_svcs = { Place initial value here… }flow_env_svcs

INFLOWS:

flow_env_svcs = Env_Services/(discount_rate)^year

acc_GGI(t) = acc_GGI(t - dt) + (GGI_flow) * dt

INIT acc_GGI = GGI_flow

INFLOWS:

GGI_flow = GGI/(discount_rate)^year

Capital_Stock(t) = Capital_Stock(t - dt) + (capital_formation - depreciation) * dt

INIT Capital_Stock = 389230

INFLOWS:

capital_formation = investment*0.449+Env__Activity-Env_R&D-Env_Aug_Exp+cap_from_env_net_export

OUTFLOWS:

depreciation = Capital_Stock*.1

Environmental_Stock(t) = Environmental_Stock(t - dt) + (aug_flow - pollutionflow) * dt

INIT Environmental_Stock = 82.2426+aug_flow+pollutionflow

INFLOWS:

aug_flow = ((Env_Augmentation-delay(Env_Augmentation,1))^.91)*2.0

OUTFLOWS:

pollutionflow = ((-env_pollution_transform_fcn+delay_env_trans_fcn)^1.3)*0.7

Environmental_Technology_Stock(t) = Environmental_Technology_Stock(t - dt) + (Env_R&D) * dt

INIT Environmental_Technology_Stock = Env_R&D

INFLOWS:

Env_R&D = Env__Activity*R&D_intensity

sum_SE_E(t) = sum_SE_E(t - dt) + (Flow_SE_E) * dt

INIT sum_SE_E = Flow_SE_E

INFLOWS:

Flow_SE_E = SE_of_Env_Stock

sum_SE_K(t) = sum_SE_K(t - dt) + (SE_K_flow) * dt

INIT sum_SE_K = SE_K_flow

INFLOWS:

SE_K_flow = SE_of_Kapital

year(t) = year(t - dt) + (yearadd) * dt

INIT year = 1

INFLOWS:

yearadd = 1

year2(t) = year2(t - dt) + (year1) * dt

INIT year2 = year1+1989

INFLOWS:

year1 = initial_year

adj_factor = 40

cap_from_env_net_export = env_net_export_parameter*Env__Activity

consindex = 100+(consumption-300000)/100000*2 + 100

consumption = GDP-investment-Env__Activity

deg_of_fitness = sum_SE_E+sum_SE_K

delay_env_trans_fcn = DELAY(env_pollution_transform_fcn,1)

discount_rate = 1.02

Econ_Policy = 0.299

Env_Augmentation = logn(Env_Aug_Exp)*adj_factor

Env_Aug_Exp = Env__Activity*0.0037/Env_Policy

Env_Index = 100*(Env_Services-6.5)/4*2+100

env_net_export_parameter = 0.01

Env_Policy = (1-Econ_Policy)*env_weight*env_policy_factors

env_policy_factors = 1

env_pollution_transform_fcn = exp(8.816566621-0.916511998* logn(Pollution_Function))

Env_Services = 0.06*Environmental_Stock

env_weight = GWI_allocration_ratio*1

Env__Activity = GDP*Env_Policy

GDP = exp(-348.5008+0.3474*logn(0.875136597*Capital_Stock)+46.9874*logn(year2))

GGI = GGI_weight_2*Env_Index+(1-GGI_weight_2)*consindex

GGI_weight_2 = 0.3

GWI_allocration_ratio = 0.3

initial_year = 1

investment = GDP*Econ_Policy

Pollution_Function = 44.351+0.0001158*GDP-0.0000456*Environmental_ Technology_Stock

R&D_intensity = 0.05

SE_of_Env_Stock = ((Environmental_Stock-Data_Env_Stock)/Data_Env_Stock)^2

SE_of_GDP = GDP-Data_GDP

SE_of_Kapital = ((Capital_Stock-Data_Capital)/Data_Capital)^2

Data_Capital = GRAPH(TIME)

(0.00, 389231), (1.90, 504888), (3.80, 612933), (5.70, 707897), (7.60, 824348), (9.50, 979953), (11.4, 1.1e+006), (13.3, 1.3e+006), (15.2, 1.4e+006), (17.1, 1.5e+006), (19.0, 1.6e+006)

Data_Env_Stock = GRAPH(TIME)

(0.00, 82.5), (1.06, 84.3), (2.11, 86.2), (3.17, 88.1), (4.22, 90.9), (5.28, 93.1), (6.33, 95.5), (7.39, 101), (8.44, 104), (9.50, 106), (10.6, 106), (11.6, 106), (12.7, 107), (13.7, 109), (14.8, 107), (15.8, 111), (16.9, 110), (17.9, 112), (19.0, 111)

Data_GDP = GRAPH(TIME)

(0.00, 186691), (1.06, 226008), (2.11, 257525), (3.17, 290676), (4.22, 340208), (5.28, 398838), (6.33, 448596), (7.39, 491135), (8.44, 484103), (9.50, 529500), (10.6, 603236), (11.6, 651415), (12.7, 720539), (13.7, 767114), (14.8, 826893), (15.8, 865241), (16.9, 908744), (17.9, 975013), (19.0, 1e+006)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Han, TW., Kim, GS., Lim, D. (2012). Green Growth Index and Policy Feedback. In: Vazquez-Brust, D., Sarkis, J. (eds) Green Growth: Managing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4417-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics