Abstract
The green technology of LUBEI Eco-Industrial Park has undergone a process of evolution including a technology R&D stage, a technology improvement stage, a technology integration stage and a product innovation stage. The evolution of green technology of LUBEI Eco-Industrial Park in China during the last decade indicates a variety of green technological trajectories. The emerging green technology receives resistance from end-of-pipe technologies. The breakthrough of the path dependence by the existing technology is facilitated by changes in the ‘selected environment’ (the dynamic factors shaping technological evolution), i.e. favourable policies, auxiliary technological support, market environment, corporate culture and resources endowment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Annual statistic report on environment in China 2003.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Shenmin Li, A study on the industrialization for recycle and reuse of solid wastes in Shanghai, Master’s Dissertation of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2008.
- 7.
The development of Radical green technology innovation is an uncontrolled factor for the system.
References
Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131.
Bartlett, D., & Trifilova, A. (2010). Green technology and eco-innovation: Seven case-studies from a Russian manufacturing context. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(8), 910–929.
Belis-Bergouignan, M.-C., Oltra, V., & Jean, M. S. (2004). Trajectories towards clean technology: Example of volatile organic compound emission reductions. Ecological Economics, 48, 201–220.
Chertow, M. R. (2000). Industrial symbiosis: Literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25(1), 313–337.
Diao, X. C., & Su, J. Q. (2008). The evolution mechanism and path analysis of industrial symbiosis network of Shandong LUBEI Group. R&D Management, 20(5), 34–38 (in Chinese).
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11(3), 147–162.
Faucheux, S., & Nicolai, I. (1998). Les firmes face au développement soutenable: Changement technologique et gouvernance au sein de la dynamique industrielle. Revue d’Economie Industrielle, 83(1), 127–146.
Fussler, C., & James, P. (1996). Driving eco-innovation: A breakthrough discipline for innovation and sustainability. London: Pitman Publishing.
Guo, L. (2005). Industrial symbiosis evolution and its technological motives. Dalian University of Technology (in Chinese).
Hartje, V. J., & Lurie, R. L. (1984). Adoption rules for pollution control innovations: End-of-pipe versus integrated technologies. International Institute for Environment and Society. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum.
Huber, J. (2008). Technological environmental innovations (TEIs) in a chain-analytical and life-cycle-analytical perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(18), 1980–1986.
Kemp, R., & Soete, L. (1992). The greening of technological progress: An evolutionary perspective. Futures, 24(5), 437–457.
Menanteau, P., & Lefebvre, H. (2000). Competing technologies and the diffusion of innovations: The emergence of energy-efficient lamps in the residential sector. Research Policy, 29(3), 375–389.
Moors E. H. M., Mulder, K. F., Vergragt, P. J. (2005). Towards cleaner production: Barriers and strategies in the base metals producing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(7), 657–668.
Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R., & Martin, B. R. (2010). Technology policy and global warming: Why new policy models are needed (or why putting new wine in old bottles won’t work). Research Policy, 39(8), 1011–1023.
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1977). In search of a useful theory of innovation. Research Policy, 6(1), 36–76.
North, D. (1998). Where have we been and where are we going? In A. Ben-Ner & L. Putterman (Eds.), Economics, values, and organization (pp. 491–508). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oltra, V., & Saint Jean, M. (2007). Incrementalism of environmental innovations versus paradigmatic change: A comparative study of the automotive and chemical industries: The 5th European Meeting on Applied Evolutionary Economics (EMAEE), Session on “Environmental innovations”. May 17–19, Manchester, UK.
Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation-eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.
Yu, X. C., Wu, C. Y., & Wang, W. Z. (2007). Pattern selection of LUBEI Eco-Industrial Park based on circle economy. China Soft Science, 22(6), 135–140 (in Chinese).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.70603005, the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant No.N100406005 and Department of Humanities and Social Sciences and Education Fund under Grant No. 08JC630012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guo, L. (2012). The Diffusion of Green Technological Innovations and Stimulus: The Case of LUBEI Eco-Industrial Park in China. In: Vazquez-Brust, D., Sarkis, J. (eds) Green Growth: Managing the Transition to a Sustainable Economy. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4417-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4417-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4416-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4417-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)