Abstract
A philosophical doctrine may either facilitate or hinder the exploration of reality. For example, realism favors such exploration, whereas constructivism-relativism is hostile to it. And a philosophy may be ambivalent: enlightened in some respects and obscurantist in others. For instance, Descartes’ mind-body dualism was a bane for psychology and psychiatry because it encouraged brainless speculation , but a boon to biomedical research because it justified dissection and vivisection. Rousseau was progressive in political philosophy but reactionary with regard to science. Romanticism was revolutionary in art but reactionary in philosophy. Positivism exalted scientific research while hindering it for attempting to restrict it to describing appearances. And Marxism benefited the social sciences in stressing the centrality of the so-called material factors, but harmed it in underestimating other factors and in adopting Hegel’s obscurities and confusions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bunge, M. (2012). Philosophies and Phobosophies. In: Evaluating Philosophies. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 295. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4408-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4408-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4407-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4408-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)