Skip to main content

Philosophies and Phobosophies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evaluating Philosophies

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science ((BSPS,volume 295))

  • 1357 Accesses

Abstract

A philosophical doctrine may either facilitate or hinder the exploration of reality. For example, realism favors such exploration, whereas constructivism-relativism is hostile to it. And a philosophy may be ambivalent: enlightened in some respects and obscurantist in others. For instance, Descartes’ mind-body dualism was a bane for psychology and psychiatry because it encouraged brainless speculation , but a boon to biomedical research because it justified dissection and vivisection. Rousseau was progressive in political philosophy but reactionary with regard to science. Romanticism was revolutionary in art but reactionary in philosophy. Positivism exalted scientific research while hindering it for attempting to restrict it to describing appearances. And Marxism benefited the social sciences in stressing the centrality of the so-called material factors, but harmed it in underestimating other factors and in adopting Hegel’s obscurities and confusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bunge, M. (2012). Philosophies and Phobosophies. In: Evaluating Philosophies. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, vol 295. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4408-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics