Abstract
In this chapter the potential transformation of an area and the role networks can play is discussed. For a far-future transformation, the current situation as well as the near-future, already taken policy decisions, function as the starting point for the design. Network theory is subsequently used to identify the crucial nodes in the networks where a potential transformation is likely to be successful. These nodes can be defined making use of the common rules of networks. Some points in networks are better (more intensively) connected with more links, than others. These hubs, the more attractive nodes to link with, get richer, which makes them even more attractive to link with, which makes them richer and so forth. The places where these successful nodes are located can be identified and calculated as has been shown in the exercise in this chapter. The number and importance of connections as well as the typology of the nodes (a place consisting of one type is less attractive than if three networks overlap) play an important role in determining the interesting locations. Once these are found they can be used in the design, as is illustrated in the Peat Colonies case study. The structure of networks, with spines, nerves and nodes, in combination with a clear and specific objective leads to challenging and sustainable designs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Graham and Marvin (2001) describe the intertwined infrastructures of electropolis (energy), hydropolis (water), cybercity (Internet), railcity (train) and autocity (car) super-positioned on top of each other.
References
Barabási A-L (2003) Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means. New York: Penguin Group
Bianconi G, Barabási A-L (2001) Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks. Europhys Lett 54:436–442. In: Newman M, Barabási A-L, Watts DJ (eds) (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Woodstock
Broder A, Kumar R, Maghoul F, Raghavan P, Rajagopalan S, Stata R, Tomkins A, Wiener J (2000) Graph structure in the web. Comput Netw 33:309–320. In: Newman M, Barabási A-L, Watts DJ (eds) (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Woodstock
Broersma S, Fremouw M, Stremke S, van den Dobbelsteen A, de Waal R (2011) Duurzame energiestructuurvisie voor de Veenkoloniën. TU Delft/WUR, Delft
Buchanan M (2002) Nexus, small worlds and the groundbreaking science of networks. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York
Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society. Blackwell, Oxford
Erdós P, Rényi A (1960) On the evolution of random graphs. Publ Math Inst Hung Acad Sci 5:17–61. In: Newman M, Barabási A-L, Watts DJ (eds) (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Woodstock
Graham S, Marvin S (2001) Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge, London
Hao H, Wang X (2010) Spatial planning for climate change adaptation – test and improve spatial planning methodology for the CCA. Thesis. Van Hall Larenstein, Velp
Nagler J, Levina A, Timme M (2011) Impact of single links in competitive percolation. Nat Phys 7:265–270
Newman M, Barabási A-L, Watts DJ (eds) (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Woodstock
Oikonomou P, Cluzel P (2006) Effects of topology on network evolution. Nat Phys 2(8):532–536
PA Consulting (2009) Dynamic planning for COIN in Afghanistan. http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/Afghanistan_Dynamic_Planning.pdf
Prieto C, Risueno A, Fontanillo C, de las Rivas J (undated) Human gene coexpression landscape: confident network derived from tissue transcriptomic profiles. Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics Research Group, Cancer Research Center (CIC-IBMCC, USAL/CSIC), Salamanca. Retrieved from: http://bioinfow.dep.usal.es/coexpression/. Accessed 9 Feb 2012
Solé RV, Pastor-Satorras R, Smith E, Kepler TB (2002) A model of large-scale proteome evolution. Adv Complex Syst 5:43–54. In: Newman M, Barabási A-L, Watts DJ (eds) (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Woodstock
Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393:440–442. In: Newman M, Barabási A-L, Watts DJ (eds) (2006) The structure and dynamics of networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Woodstock
Websites
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_network. Accessed 9 Feb 2012
www.dreamstime.com/royalty-free-stock-photography-neural-network-image11819917. Accessed 9 Feb 2012
www.flickr.com/photos/amattox/3236510649/. Accessed 9 Feb 2012
www.flickr.com/photos/anikarenina/238385060/. Accessed 9 Feb 2012
www.mcn.ece.ufl.edu/public/YuejiaHe/network.htm. Accessed 9 Feb 2012
www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/20th-anniversary-of-world-wide-web-381974. Accessed 9 Feb 2012
www.kaart.nieuwekaart.nl. Accessed 15 Nov 2011
www.techopedia.com/definition/25064/network-theory. Accessed 9 Feb 2012
www.thp.uni-koeln.de/∼lassig/projects.html. Accessed 9 Feb 2012
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roggema, R., Stremke, S. (2012). Networks as the Driving Force for Climate Design. In: Roggema, R. (eds) Swarming Landscapes. Advances in Global Change Research, vol 48. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4378-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4378-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4377-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4378-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)