Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Achievement Gap in Science and Mathematics: A Turkish Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Closing the Achievement Gap from an International Perspective

Abstract

Turkey is a highly developing country with a booming economy and the youngest population ratio in Europe. Approximately a quarter of the nation’s population consists of elementary and high school students. Despite this young population rate, the achievement levels of most students in science and mathematics are below expected levels. In terms of general science and mathematics achievement ranking, Turkey was 29th among 30 Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries in the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2006 and was 32nd among 34 OECD countries in PISA 2009. In addition to low achievement levels of Turkish students in the international context, there are also achievement gaps in the national context. In general, achievement gaps exist in the Turkish education system because of four reasons: large quality differences in school types, extremely competitive nationwide examinations, highly standardized and teacher-centered science and mathematics teaching, and the effects of large socioeconomic background differences on science and mathematics achievement. In response to these challenges, the Ministry of National Education (MONE) has taken many precautions. Recent science and mathematics curricula reforms have been built on more student-centered and flexible learning and teaching methods instead of standardized teaching. Parallel with this reformist movement, the number of nationwide examinations, especially at elementary school levels, has decreased. Moreover, MONE continues to decrease the number of school types, especially at high school levels, because the biggest achievement gaps in science and mathematics exist between high school types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Akpınar, E., & Ergin, O. (2005a). Yapılandırmacı kurama dayalı fen öğretimine yönelik bir uygulama. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akpınar, E., & Ergin, O. (2005b). The role of science teacher in constructivist theory. Elementary Education Online, 4(2), 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alacacı, C., & Erbas, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 182–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aypay, A., Erdogan, M., & Sozer, M. A. (2007). Variation among schools on classroom practices in science based on TIMSS-1999 in Turkey. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1417–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berberoglu, G., Celebi, O., Ozdemir, E., Uysal, E., & Yayan, B. (2003). Factors affecting achievement levels of Turkish students in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Educational Sciences and Practice, 2, 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berberoglu, G., & Kalender, I. (2005). Investigation of student achievement across years, school types and regions: The SSE and PISA analyses. Educational Sciences and Practice, 4(7), 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozdogan, A. E., & Altuncekic, A. (2007). Fen Bilgisi Öğretmen Adaylarının 5E Öğretim Modelinin Kullanılabilirliği Hakkındaki Görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 15(2), 579–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakiroglu, E., & Cakiroglu, J. (2003). Reflections on teacher education in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Higher Education (COHE). (2012). Universities. July 2012, http://www.yok.gov.tr/en/content/view/527/222/.

  • Delen, E., & Bulut, O. (2011). The relationship between students’ exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dincer, M. A., & Uysal, G. (2010). The determinants of student achievement in Turkey. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(6), 592–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engin-Demir, C. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievement of the Turkish urban poor. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guncer, B., & Kose, M. R. (1993). Effects of family and school on Turkish students’ academic performance. Education and Society, 11(1), 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalender, I., & Berberoglu, G. (2009). An assessment of factors related to science achievement of Turkish students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1379–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koseleci-Blanchy, N., & Sasmaz, A. (2011). PISA 2009: Where does Turkey stand? Turkish Policy Quarterly, 10(2), 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MONE). (2004). National report on PISA 2003. Directorate of Educational Research and Development, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MONE). (2006). Science and technology curriculum of elementary schools (6th–8th grades). Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MONE). (2009a). Mathematics curriculum of elementary schools (6th–8th grades). Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MONE). (2009b). Statistics on the level placement examination 2009. General Directorate of Educational Technologies, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MONE). (2010). Statistics on the level placement examination 2010. General Directorate of Educational Technologies, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2002). Education at a Glance, Glossary, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007a). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2007b). Reviews of national policies for education: Basic education in Turkey. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010a). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do–Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. I). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming Social Background–Equity in Learning Opportunities and Outcomes (Vol. II). Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdemir, E. (2003). Modeling of the factors affecting science achievement of eighth grade Turkish students based on the third international mathematics and science study repeat (TIMSS-R) data. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozgun-Koca, A., & Sen, A. I. (2002). Evaluation of the results of the third international mathematics and science study for Turkey. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43, 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, I. (2007). Assessment of new Turkish curriculum for grade 1 to 5. Elementary Education Online, 6(2), 284–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum: The case of mathematics. American Educator, Summer, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, N. (2004). A critical approach to constructive learning and instruction. Educational Sciences and Practice, 3(5), 115–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topcu, M. S. (2011). Turkish elementary student teachers’ epistemological beliefs and moral reasoning. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 99–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). (2012a). Number of schools, teachers, divisions, students and graduates by type of school and educational year. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). (2012b). Number of applicants and appointed to tertiary education by school type and educational status. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalvac, B., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Kahyaoglu, E. (2007). Turkish pre-service science teachers’ views on science-technology-society issues. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yayan, B., & Berberoglu, G. (2004). A re-analysis of the TIMSS-1999 mathematics assessment data of the Turkish students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz-Tuzun, O., & Topcu, M. S. (2008). Relationships among preservice science teachers’ epistemological beliefs, epistemological world views, and self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Science Education, 30(1), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Elementary Science Education, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Mugla, Turkey

    Mustafa Sami Topcu

Authors
  1. Mustafa Sami Topcu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Sami Topcu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Chevy Chase, Maryland, USA

    Julia V. Clark

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Topcu, M. (2014). The Achievement Gap in Science and Mathematics: A Turkish Perspective. In: Clark, J. (eds) Closing the Achievement Gap from an International Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4357-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation