Skip to main content

Securing STEM Pathways for Australian High School Students from Low-SES Localities: Science and Mathematics Academy at Flinders (SMAF)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In Australia, science and mathematics are considered key subjects for ensuring the country’s economic prosperity and sustainable development into the future. Meeting this agenda requires a scientifically literate population that values science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), and the opportunities provided by careers in the field. Over the last decade, international comparisons of student achievement in science and mathematics suggest that Australian students are in general outperforming many of their peers in OECD countries (OECD, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). However, what is a concern is that when these data are analyzed more critically, significant achievement gaps emerge in relation to socioeconomic status (SES) and geographical location. This chapter focuses on SES in relation to the achievement of secondary science and mathematics students. Initially, the PISA data (PISA, Programme for International Student Assessment) are used to highlight the extent of the issue for Australian students and their teachers. Following this, a number of major factors aligned to teacher attraction and retention in schools located in lower-SES localities are discussed. Having established the Australian context, the Science and Mathematics Academy Flinders (SMAF) project is presented to demonstrate what is possible when university personnel, local principals, and teachers work collaboratively to close the achievement gap for students. Importantly, this project was initiated specifically to overcome the key issues impacting student achievement and aspirations in science and mathematics associated with schools in lower-SES localities. In closing, we discuss some of the possible challenges for SMAF in ensuring that schools are empowered in a sustainable way to continue enhancing the opportunities for their students into the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainley, J., Kos, J., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in science, mathematics and technology in Australian education. ACER research monograph, 63. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER. http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/Mono63_MathsSciTechSept08.pdf. Accessed 19th March 2012.

  • Ainsworth, J. W. (2002). Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces, 81(1), 117–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Science. (2011). Australian science in a changing world: Innovation requires global engagement. Position paper. www.science.org.au/reports. Accessed 3rd March 2012.

  • Campbell, C. (2005). Changing school loyalties and the middle class: A reflection on the developing fate of state comprehensive high schooling. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Inequality and the right to learn: Access to qualified teachers in California’s public schools. Teachers College Record, 106(10), 1936–1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEST. (2006a). Audit of science, engineering and technology skills. Canberra, ACT: Department of Education Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEST. (2006b). Audit of science, engineering and technology skills. Canberra, ACT: Department of Education Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • FASTS. (2002). Australian Science: Investing in the future. http://www.the-funneled-web.com/Response/FASTS-policy-2002.pdf. Accessed 2nd March 2012.

  • Friedlaender, D., & Frenkel, S. (2002). School equity study documentation. Los Angeles: UCLA Institute for Democracy, Education, and Access.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullarton, S. (2002). Student engagement with school: Individual and school influences. Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth (LSAY) research report, number 27. Melbourne: Australian Council for Education Research. http://research.acer.edu.au/lsay_research/31. Accessed 18th March 2012

  • Goodrum, D., Druhan, A., & Abbs, J. (2011). The status and quality of year 11 and 12 science in Austrlralian schools. Report prepared for the Office of the Chief Scientist. http://www.science.org.au/reports/documents/Year-1112-Report-Final.pdf. 3rd Feb 2012.

  • Gorard, S., Fitz, J., & Taylor, C. (2001). School choice impacts: What do we know? Educational Researcher, 30(7), 18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K., Jensz, F., & Baldwin, G. (2005). Who’s teaching science? Meeting the demand for qualified science teachers in Australian secondary schools. Report prepared for Australian Council of Deans of Science by the Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Melbourne, VIC: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, K. (2005). The first year experience: The transition from secondary school to university and TAFE in Australia. Longitudinal Surveys of Australia Youth Research Report, Number 40. http://research.acer.edu.au/lsay_research/44. Accessed 3rd May 2012.

  • Kelly, A. M., & Sheppard, K. (2009). Secondary school physics availability in an urban setting: Issues related to academic achievement and course offerings. American Journal Physics, 77(10), 902–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, english proficiency, and late-emerging reading difficulties. Educational Researcher, 39(6), 484–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara-Cinisomo, S., Pebley, A. R., Vaiana, M. E., Maggio, E., Berends, M., & Lucas, S. (2004). A matter of class: Educational achievement reflects family background more than ethnicity or immigration. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowell, L. B., & Salzman, H. (2007). Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. http://www.urban.org/publications/411562.html. Accessed 19th March 2012.

  • Lyons, T., Cooksey, R., Panizzon, D., Parnell, A., & Pegg, J. (2006). Science, ICT and mathematics education in rural and regional Australia: Report from the SiMERR National Survey. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConney, A., & Perry, L. B. (2010). Science and mathematics achievement in Australia: The role of school socioeconomic composition in educational equity and effectiveness. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 429–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B. (2006). Achieving equality and equity in education. http://www.unisa.edu.au/hawkecentre/events/2006events/ BarryMcGaw_presentation_Aug06pdf. Accessed 15th Dec 2011.

  • Obama, B. (2011). Weekly address: To win the future, America must win the global competition in education. February 19th, 2011. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/02/19/weekly-address-win-future-america-must-win-global-competition-education. Accessed 20th March 2012.

  • OECD Global Science Forum. (2006). Evolution of student interest in science and technology studies: Policy report. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/30/36645825.pdf. Accessed 3rd Oct 2011.

  • Office of the Chief Scientist (2012). Health of Australian science. http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Report-for-web.pdf. Accessed 14th April 2012.

  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizzon, D. (2009). Science education in rural areas: Exploring the issues, challenges and future directions. In S. Richie (Ed.), The world of science education: Handbook of research in Australasia (pp. 137–162). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panizzon, D., Westwell, M., & Elliott, K. (2010). Exploring the profile of teachers of secondary science: What are the emerging issues for future workforce planning? Teaching Science, 56(4), 18–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, A., Flavell, K., & Dao-Cheng, N. (2010). Scoping our future: Addressing Australia’s engineering skills shortage. Australian National Engineering Taskforce. http://www.anet.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Scoping-our-futureWEB.pdf. Accessed 20th Dec 2011.

  • Ryan, C., & Watson, L. (2004). The drift to private schools in Australia: Understanding its features. Discussion Paper No. 479. Canberra, ACT: Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different countries relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project Rose. Asia Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–17. http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt. Accessed 4th March 2012.

  • Thomson, S., & De Bortoli, L. (2008). Exploring scientific literacy: How Australia measures up. Resource document. http://www.acer.edu.au/news/2007_PISA.html. Accessed 20th Dec 2007.

  • Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2010). Challenges for Australian education: Results from PISA 2009. http://research.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/9. 8th June 2011.

  • Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Clark, J. C. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary–secondary school transition. http://www.deewr.gov.au/Skills/Resources/Documents/OpenPathinSciTechMathEnginPrimSecSchTrans.pdf. Accessed 7th Nov 2011.

  • Williams, D. J. (2010). School composition and contextual effects on student outcomes. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1008–1037.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Appreciation is extended to the Southern Knowledge Transfer Partnerships at Flinders University for providing the finance necessary to fund the administration and resources required for the Science and Mathematics Academy at Flinders. We thank Dr. Suzanne Owen for undertaking the evaluation of SMAF, providing data for use in this chapter. Finally, we acknowledge the ongoing and sustained support of the principals, teachers, and students involved in SMAF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra Panizzon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Panizzon, D., Westwell, M., Elliott, K. (2014). Securing STEM Pathways for Australian High School Students from Low-SES Localities: Science and Mathematics Academy at Flinders (SMAF). In: Clark, J. (eds) Closing the Achievement Gap from an International Perspective. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4357-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics