Abstract
The chapters in this section collectively contribute to a body of work defined by its renewed focus on understanding the contextual and contingent nature of learning—work that also calls for, directly or by implication, a new model of interventionist research designed to improve the educational circumstance of underserved youth, notably students from nondominant communities. I will say more about this point shortly. Of significance, I believe these chapters address conceptual and methodological challenges encountered in carrying out thoughtful empirical work on learning across spaces and contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barton, D,. & Hamilton, M. (1998). Loc ă l literacies : Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
Col, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future displine. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.
Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourse. (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
Gee, J. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces from the age of mythology to today’s schools. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power, and social context (pp. 214–232). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1984). Current activity for the future. In B. Rogoff & J. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the ‘zone of proximal Development’: New directions for child development (pp. 45–63). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gutiérrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43(2), 148–164.
Gutiérrez, K., Bien, A., & Selland, M. (2011). Polylingual and polycultural learning ecologies: Mediating emergent academic literacies for dual language learners. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 11(2), 232–261.
Gutiérrez, K., Bien, A., Selland, M., & Pierce, D. (2010). Syncretic approaches to studying movement and hybridity in literacy practices. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Gutiérrez, K., Izquierdo, C., & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2010). Middle class working families’ ideologies and engagement in children’s extracurricular activities. International Journal of Learning, 17(3), 633–656.
Gutiérrez, K., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. White Plains, NY: Sharpe.
Lipsitz, G. (2004). New times and new identities: Solidarities of sameness and dynamics of difference. In G. Gonzalez, R. Fernandez, V. Price, D. Smith, & L. Trinh Vo (Eds.), Labor versus empire: Race, gender and migration (pp. 3–16). New York: Routledge.
Luke, A. (2003). Literacy and the other: A sociological approach to literacy research and policy in multilingual societies. Reading Research Quarterly , 38(1), 132–141.
Pavlenko, A., & Blackledge, A. (Eds.) (2004). Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts (vol. 45). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
Street, B. V. (2003). What’s “new” in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77–91.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yosso, T. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gutiérrez, K.D. (2013). Expanding Methodologies to Account for Expansive Views of Learning: A Commentary on Part II. In: Bevan, B., Bell, P., Stevens, R., Razfar, A. (eds) LOST Opportunities. Explorations of Educational Purpose, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4304-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4304-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4303-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4304-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)